Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

0.91s

  • Bell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

    641 P.2d 1115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1982

    Board of Commissioners of Pawnee County, Okl., v. United States, 139 F.2d 248, 251-252 [10th Cir. 1943]; Board of County Commissioners v. Seber, supra note 15. 18 . Tiger v. … United States v. Sandoval, supra note 15, Walker v. Brown, 43 Okl. 144 , 141 P. 681, 682 [1914]; Wrigley v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Talley v. Harrison

    60 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1916

    The facts bring this case squarely within the rule laid down by the territorial Supreme Court in the case of Brown v. … This rule is followed and adhered to by this court in the case of Brown v. Davidson, 42 Okla. 598 , 142 Pac. 387 , wherein it is said by Commissioner Brewer, in commenting upon the rule announced in Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hull v. Morris

    97 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1923

    In case of Brown et al. v. … And in Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Walkingstick v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF TULSA

    706 P.2d 899 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1985

    The Board cites Winn v. Nasher, 360 S.W.2d 909 (Tex.Civ.App.1962) and Gordon v. City Council of the City of Santa Ana, 188 Cal.App.2d 680 , 10 Cal. Rptr. 776 (1961). … Banks v. City of Bethany, 541 P.2d 178, 181 (Okla.1975). 13 . Matter of Schrader, 660 P.2d 135, 138 (Okla.1983); Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lucus v. Cowan

    357 P.2d 976 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1960

    Brown, was later acquired by James Brown who is the other plaintiff in this action. … Grisham v. Southland Royalty Company, supra; Marx v. Beard, supra; Equitable Royalty Corp. v. Hullet, supra; Hanlon v. McLain, 206 Okl. 227 , 242 P.2d 732 ; Bliss v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE ASSESSMENTS FOR TAX YEAR 2012 OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES

    481 P.3d 883 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 2021

    Supreme Court in Board of Comm'rs of Jackson County, Kansas, v. … See also Brown v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Foote v. Carter

    357 P.2d 1000 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1960

    In the case of Fisher et al. v. Gear, 196 Okl. 18 , 162 P.2d 182, 183 , we said: “In Brock v. … In McElhinny v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Guaranty State Bank of Checotah v. Price

    126 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1927

    It is urged that the facts in the case at ' bar bring it within the rule announced in the case of Greenshaw v. Brown, 96 Okla. 11 , 219 Pac. 934 . We do not think it does. … The instant ease, therefore, does not come within the rule anounced in Greenshaw v. Brown, supra, but does come within the rule stated in the case of Trower et al. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harris Et Ux. v. Arthur

    36 Okla. 33 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1912

    Brown, 20 Okla. 334 , 95 Pac. 441 , 20 L. R. A. (N. S.) 298, Riggles v. Erney et al., 154 U. S. *36 244, 14 Sup. Ct. 1083, 38 L. Ed. 976 , and Williams v. Morris, 95 U. S. 444 , 24 L. Ed. 360 . … Browne, Statute of Frauds (5th Ed.) 455 et seq.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Zagal v. Truckstops Corp. of America

    68 O.B.A.J. 2141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1997

    Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, ¶ 7 , 935 P.2d 319 . … Brown , at ¶ 11; 1 Rogers v. Hennessee, 602 P.2d 1033, 1034 (Okla.1979). An owner is under no legal duty to warn an invitee of a danger which is obvious and should be observed in the exercise of ordinary care. Byford v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Lawrence v. State Industrial Commission

    120 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1926

    See Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. et al. v. J. L. Thomas, 115 Okla. 67 , 241 Pac. 820 . … Attorneys for petitioner cite .and rely upon the cases of Hazelton Coal Co. et al. v. Baker et al., 112 Okla. 107 , 240 Pac. 93 , and Integrity Mutual Casualty Co. v. Walter Garrett. 100 Okla. 185 , 229 Pac. 282 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Maley

    62 O.B.A.J. 557 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1991

    Baggett v. State Election Board, 501 P.2d 817 (Okla.1972). … Brown, 79 Okl. 215 , 192 P. 227 [1920]; and (f) the judge's death prevented settlement of the appellate record, In re James' Will, 64 Okl. 70 , 166 P. 131 [1917]; J.W. Ripey & Son v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. City of Tulsa

    179 Okla. 176 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1936

    City of Duncan v. Brown, 69 Okla. 246 , 172 P. 79 ; City of Ada v. Burrow, 171 Okla. 142 . 42 P. (2d) 111 . … See City of Tulsa v. Frye, 165 Okla. 302 , 25 P. (2d) 1080 ; City of Bristow v. Pinkley, 158 Okla. 104 , 12 P. (2d) 229 ; City of Ada v. Burrow, 171 Okla. 142 , 42 P. (2d) 111 ; Smith v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Warren v. Myers

    554 P.2d 1171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1976

    See: Carman v. Fishel, supra. … In Norman Plumbing Supply of Oklahoma, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jacobson's Lifetime Buildings, Inc. v. City of Tulsa

    333 P.2d 307 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1958

    Oklahoma City v. Green Construction Co., 184 Okl. 98 , 84 P.2d 623 ; Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise Board, 194 Okl. 40 , 146 P.2d 996 . … Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • BD. OF TRUSTEES OF POLICE PENSION v. Weed

    719 P.2d 1276 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1986

    Public School Retirement System of Mo., 631 S.W.2d 893 (Mo.Ct.App.1982); Board of Trustees of the Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa v. Kern, 366 P.2d 415, 418 (Okla.1961); Bakenhus v. … Once qualified for a pension it was the Retirement Board’s duty to order that his pension be paid. State v. Riggs, 313 P.2d 523, 526 (Okla.1957).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Little v. Employer's Casualty Co.

    185 Okla. 481 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1939

    Swift & Co. v. Walden, 176 Okla. 268 , 55 P.2d 71 . As said in the ease of Osborn v. … To the same effect see Rose v. Singer Bros. Cloak Co., 171 Okla. 245 , 42 P.2d 548 ; Claypool v. Employer’s Casualty Co., 177 Okla. 286 , 58 P.2d 876 ; Mires v. Hogan, 79 Okla. 233 , 192 P. 811 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Major

    317 P.2d 190 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1957

    As further support for such argument defendant relies upon the holding in Thomas & Sons v. Axtell, 97 Okl. 228 , 223 P. 152 . Examination of this case reflects the inapplicability of that decision to this appeal. … The argument is that the language of the Act is clear and unequivocal and was so recognized in National Security Corp. v. Kneeland, Okl., 294 P.2d 310 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • R.R. Tway, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

    910 P.2d 972 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1995

    Board of Tax Roll Corrections of Tulsa County v. Mack Truck Sales, 620 P.2d 388 (1980). … See Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Hoyle v. Glenn E. Breeding Co.

    555 P.2d 1278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1976

    Similarly in Spellman v. … In Poley v. Browne, 199 Okl. 416 , 186 P.2d 812 (1947), this Court considered a situation analogous to the case now before us.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.