Case law

Walker v. Von Wedel

108 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1925

anaesthetics, and while under the influence *293 of anaesthetics and unconscious, said defendant, without the knowledge or assent of plaintiff, forcibly bent the fingers of plaintiffs right hand backward and bandaged same on a board … The attention of the court has been called to the case of Brown v. Sinclair Refining Company, 86 Okla. 143 , 206 Pac. 1042 , and also the case of Booth & Flynn v. Cook et al., 79 Okla. 280 , 193 Pac. 36 .

Milton v. Hayes

770 P.2d 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1989

Oklahoma County Excise Board, Okl., 618 P.2d 915 (1980), and that more recent enactments will control over prior enactments, see e.g. City of Sand Springs v. Department of Public Welfare, Okl., 608 P.2d 1139 (1980). … Tannehill v. Special Indemnity Fund, Okl., 538 P.2d 590 (1975). See, also: State, ex rel., Roussel, et al., v. St. John the Baptist Parish School Board, 135 So.2d 665 (La.1961).

Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.

476 P.2d 329 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1970

In Wyoming National Bank v. Brown, 7 Wyo. 494 , 53 P. 291 , it was contended a judgment was a contract, and a rate of interest fixed by statute at time of rendition, could not be changed or modified by statute. … Consistent application of this rule, in respect to fact situations involving fixed rights accrued under statutes prior to amendment, may be observed in Board Trustees, etc. v. Kern, Okl., 366 P.2d 415 , and Stagg v.

Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass'n v. Cities Service Oil Co.

570 P.2d 49 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 1977

Wooten v. Hall, Okl., 442 P.2d 334, 336 (1968). The evident legislative intent is not violated by this holding. … Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Welch, Okl., 446 P.2d 268, 270 (1968).

First National Bank & Trust Co. of Ada v. Arles

62 O.B.A.J. 2434 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1991

Nguyen v. State, 772 P.2d 401, 403 (Okla.Crim.App.1989); 22 O.S.1981 § 991c. We recognize that an indirect contempt action is civil in nature and not governed by the criminal law, Browning v. … Dept. of Health v. Davis, 616 F.2d 828, 831 (5th Cir.1980). In Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board, supra, the United States Supreme Court addressed Section 407(a) and its restrictions.

Rollings v. Thermodyne Industries, Inc.

67 O.B.A.J. 399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1996

Utah and New Mexico were faced with similar challenges in Barnhart v. Civil Serv. Employees Ins. Co., 16 Utah 2d 223 , 398 P.2d 873 (1965) and Board of Educ. v. Harrell, 118 N.M. 470 , 882 P.2d 511 (1994). … Brown, Okl., 516 P.2d 526, 528 (1973); Sharpe v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association, Okl., 448 P.2d 301, 306 (1968); State ex rel. Ogden v.

Robinson v. Territory of Oklahoma

16 Okla. 241 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1905

Myers v. Murphy, 60 Ind. 282 ; Scott v. Smith, 70 Ind. 298 ; Bowen v. Pollard, 71 Ind. 177 ; Williams v. Potter, 72 Ind. 354 ; Kissell v. Anderson, 73 Ind. 485 ; Smith v. Kyler, 74 Ind. 575 ." … Lovett v. State, 30 Fla. 102 ; Kellogg v. State (Colo.) 29 Pac. 805 ; State v. Estepp (Kans.) 24 Pac. 986 ; State v. Hendricks, 4 Pac. 1050 .” Under the authority of the case of New v.

P. Lorillard Co. v. Stevens

106 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1925

Brown represented the defendant company atl Kansas Oity. … Paulson v. Hourigan, 100 Okla. 53 . 227 Pac. 82 , and cases there cited.

Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I. O. O. F.

195 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1945

Our former opinion of Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. … . • *137 In Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

City of Ardmore v. Fowler

54 Okla. 77 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1915

Briefly, a fire alarm was turned in; Fowler was ordered to and took his position on the running board at the rear of the wagon, which started from the fire station on the *80 south side of Hinkle street, which was paved; … Cleveland Trini *84 dad Paving Co. v. Mitchell, supra; City of Osage v. Brown, 27 Kan. 74 .

BEVERLY THOMPSON, Next Friend of CHARLENE HUGHES, an Individual v. HEARTWAY CORPORATION

2025 OK 65 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 2025

See also Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Brown, 565 U.S. 530 (2012). … Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp., 2005 OK 51 138 P.3d 826 12 O.S.2021, §§ 1851 Id ., ¶ 15, 138 P.3d at 830, citing Volt v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Jr.

Horwitz v. Davis

207 Okla. 448 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1952

Hor-witz and Rose Horwitz, the county treasurer of Okmulgee county and the board of county commissioners of said county, and J. Miller and Alex Miller. … In Brown v.

Rogers v. Excise Bd. of Greer County

701 P.2d 754 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 26, 1984

of county excise boards was discussed by this court in Summey v. … Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan Auth., 626 P.2d 314, 315 (1981); Westgate Oil Co. v. Refiners Production Co., 172 Okl. 260 , 44 P.2d 993, 994 (1935); Payne v.

Means v. Blevins

66 O.B.A.J. 2313 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1995

ORDER Petitioners/County Assessor and Board of Equalization seek to prohibit respondent judge from proceeding further in an ad valo-rem tax evaluation appealed to the district court based on lack of jurisdiction. … Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Comanche County, 151 Okl. 110 , 2 P.2d 955 (1931). ALMA WILSON, C.J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur. KAUGER, V.C.J., not participating.

Bradley & Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin

87 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1922

“Yours very truly, “Addison Brown.” Brown testified in part: “Q. Isn’t it a fact, Mr. Brown, that you had a conversation with Mr. … Anicker v.

City of Norman v. Allen

47 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1915

BROWN, J. … The case of City of El Reno v.

Lowden v. Excise Bd. of Caddo County

170 Okla. 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1935

In accordance with the opinion in case No. 25479, Lowden et al. v. … Excise Board of Pittsburg County, this day decided, 170 Okla. 181 , 40 P.2d 16 , this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the Court of Tax Review to enter judgment in accordance with the stipulation as follows

Barton v. Baptist General Convention

477 P.2d 679 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1970

Johnstone v. Patterson, Okl., 418 P.2d 656 (1966); LeForce v. Ballard, Okl., 454 P.2d 297 (1969).

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Canadian County

42 Okla. 618 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1914

Suit by the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, a corporation, against the board of county commissioners of Canadian county, Okla., Geo. D. … Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200 . By the Court: It is so ordered.

Carter v. Foote

361 P.2d 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1961

In the case of Homer v. … In the case of Yeldell v.