Case law

Ex Parte Tindall

102 Okla. 192 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1924

Brown v. N. J., 175 U. S. 172 , 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 77, 44 L. Ed. 119 . Also 6 R. C. L., page 433, and cases cited in notes. … Justice Pitney in Ochoa v. Hernandez Morales, 230 U. S. 139 -40, 57 L.

Elkins v. Hardin

327 P.2d 468 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1958

In Brown v. … The one Oklahoma case, most nearly in-point, insofar as the applicable reasoning is Reynolds v. Phipps, 89 Okl. 21 , 213 P. 855, 857 .

In Re Skelton Lead & Zinc Co.'s Gross Production Tax for 1919

81 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1921

Co. v. Texas, 210 U. S. 217 ; McHenry v. Alford, 168 U. S. 651 ; quoting and relying upon the same language which we have above quoted. In Brown v. Spillman, 155 U. … In Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana, 177 U. S. 190 , the same thing was held upon the authority' • of Brown v. Spillman, supra, the court citing, quoting, and relying upon the reasoning in Brown v. Spillman. In Manuel v.

State Ex Rel. Brooks v. School Dist. No. 86

89 Okla. 142 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1923

, as members of the school board; the action being brought under the provisions ■of sections 6777 and 6778-, Rev. … Co. v. Weaver, 67 Okla. 293 , 171 Pac. 34 .

Rox Petroleum, L.L.C. v. New Dominion, L.L.C.

184 P.3d 502 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 2008

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22 , 989 P.2d 448, 455-456 . Summary judgment settles only questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. … Clauer died with the residue of his property passing to the Board of Trustees of Carleton College.

Rawley v. Commonwealth Cotton Oil Co.

88 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1922

The undisputed evidence further shows that the two boys borrowed the guns from one Sylvester Brown, a.negro employed as night watchman by the Commonwealth Cotton Oil Company; that the guns were the private property of Brown … Mirick v. Sucky (Kan.) 87 Pac. 1141 . Put counsel say the law requires of persons having in their custody instruments of danger, that (hey should keep them with the utmost care, and Dixon v.

Leatherock v. Lawter

45 Okla. 715 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

In State v. … SHARP and BROWN, J. J., concur, KANE, C. J., dissents.

Superior Oil Co. v. Swimmer

177 Okla. 396 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1936

Turner v. State Industrial Commission, 174 Okla. 486 , 50 P. (2d) 668 ; Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Keener, 162 Okla. 281 , 20 P. (2d) 170 ; Century Indemnity Co. v. Chamberlain, 152 Okla. 158 , 4 P. (2d) 79 . … Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 P. 785 .

Travelers Fire Insurance Company v. Wright

322 P.2d 417 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1958

In Ray v. … Crum v. Brock, infra. If the witness Brown is forced to testify relative to the cause of the fire he will not be disclosing any facts which go to make up the crime of perjury.

Harmon v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

196 Okla. 607 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1946

V. … Crouch & Son v. Huber, 87 Okla. 83 , 209 P. 764 ; Davis v. Goodwin-Barclay Co., 120 Okla. 274 , 251 P. 1042 ; Nickel v. Janda, 115 Okla. 207 , 242 P. 264 ; Brown v. Privette, 109 Okla. 1 , 234 P. 577 ; Duncan v.

Ponca City Welfare Ass'n v. Ludwigsen

65 O.B.A.J. 3338 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1994

It has a Board of Directors which is in charge of the organization. Claimant Phyllis Ludwigsen was its sole salaried employee. … See Brown v. Burkett, 755 P.2d 650, 652 (Okla.1988) (discussing the fact that the business was not conducted for pecuniary gain); Murphy v.

In Re the Reinstatement of Farrant

75 O.B.A.J. 2679 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 2004

O.B.A. v. Farrant, 1994 OK 18 , 867 P.2d 1279 . … Matter of Reinstatement of Brown, 1996 OK 95 , 925 P.2d 44, 49 .

Stuart v. Stuart

468 P.2d 509 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1970

See also In Re Brown’s Estate, 22 Cal.App.2d 480 , 71 P.2d 345 , to the same result. … BERRY, V. C. J., and BLACKBIRD, J., dissent.

Munsingwear, Inc. v. Tullis

557 P.2d 899 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1976

Tulsa Hotel v. Sparks, 200 Okl. 636 , 198 P.2d 652 (1948). Prior to this position, Brown & Root v. Dunkelberger, 196 Okl. 116 , 162 P. 2d 1018 (1945) made controlling the date the disability became apparent. … “Jurisdiction,” Black's Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, p. 991 and citing Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of City of Marietta v.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State

130 Okla. 263 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1928

Bank v. Brown, 62 Okal. 112, 162 Pac. 435 ; C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Austin, 63 Okla. 169 , 163 Pac. 57 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Hardy, 45 Okla. 423 , 146 Pac. 38 ; C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. … O. 1; Dewey-Portland-Cement Co. v. Director General, 73 1. C. C. 419; Pittman Co. v. Director General, 83 I. C. C. 380. And Atchison Board of Trade v. A., T. S. F. Ry. Co., 80 I. C.

In Matter of Estate of Brown

600 P.2d 857 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1979

We do not believe that § 4 of the Act of 1908 or § 23 of the 1906 Act have prohibited Thompson Brown from making a will with a power of sale. Nor do we believe that Ryburn v. … Court decided the case of Tucker v.

Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I. O. O. F.

195 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1945

Our former opinion of Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. … . • *137 In Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

Harn v. Patterson

58 Okla. 694 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1916

Rev. 262-264; Browne on Statute of Frauds (5th Ed.) secs. 197-199, pp. 249-255; Waldock v. First National Bank of Idabel, 43 Okla,. 348, 143 Pac. 53 ; Kesler v. Cheadle, 12 Okla. 489 , 72 Pac. 367 ; Davis v. … Browne on the .Statute of Frauds (5th Ed.) sec. 135, p. 164; 2 Reed on Statute of Frauds, sec. 529, p. 143; Graham v. Heinrich, 13 Okla. 107 , 74 Pac. 328 ; Cosand v. Banker, 2 S. D. 294, 50 N. W. 84 ; McLaughlin v.

In re the Reinstatement of Hird

364 P.3d 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 2015

He never saw him feel sorry for himself. 124 Jeff Brown, the Superintendent of Wright Christian Academy, also testified. He asked Hird to be on the board of. the school his youngest son attended. … His service to the board has been very good. Brown spoke of the homeless woman Alyse who came to their church for help.

Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.

476 P.2d 329 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 21, 1970

In Wyoming National Bank v. Brown, 7 Wyo. 494 , 53 P. 291 , it was contended a judgment was a contract, and a rate of interest fixed by statute at time of rendition, could not be changed or modified by statute. … Consistent application of this rule, in respect to fact situations involving fixed rights accrued under statutes prior to amendment, may be observed in Board Trustees, etc. v. Kern, Okl., 366 P.2d 415 , and Stagg v.