Case law

Barber v. Barber

74 O.B.A.J. 2441 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 2003

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22, n. 30 , 989 P.2d 448, 456, n. 30 . … Russell v. Board of County Commissioners, Carter County, 1997 OK 80 , 1 27, 952 P.2d 492, 503 .

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Coyle

24 Okla. 740 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1909

Shaw v. Tobias, 3 N. Y. 188 ; Cole v. Smith, 4 Johns. (N. Y.) 193; Bigelow v. Johnson, 13 Johns. (N. Y.) 428; Austin v. Goodrich, 49 N. Y. 266 ; Ferrett v. Atwell. 1 Blatchf. 151 , Fed. Cas. No. 4,747; Brown v. … Brown/ and there is no finding that the signature is that of appellee, Alonzo F. Brown.” In Kester v. Western Union Tel. Co., 8 Ohio Cir. Ct.

State Ex Rel. MacY v. BD. OF COM'RS

986 P.2d 1130 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1999

We used this analysis again in Brown v. Ford, 1995 OK 101, ¶ 7 , 905 P.2d 223, 228 . … (citing Morrow v. Board of Directors of Imperial Irr. Dist., 219 Cal. 246 , 26 P.2d 292 (1933)). In Board of School Trustees of Washington City Administrative Unit v.

DANI v. MILLER

2016 OK 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 2016

Ladra , 2015 OK 53, ¶8; Simonson , 2013 OK 25, ¶3; Fanning v. Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶4, 85 P.3d 841. … Board of County Comm'rs of Muskogee County v. Lowery , 2006 OK 31, n. 9, 136 P.3d 639.

Brownell v. Moorehead

65 Okla. 218 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 2, 1917

Lamb, 28 Okla. 275 , 114 Pac. 333 ), but as impeachment of the witness, Albert Brown-ell. … Bank v. Johnson, 22 Okla. 228 , 98 Pac. 343 ); when it appears that “the jury were misled thereby” (Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Brown, 45 Okla. 476 , 146 Pac. 6 ), etc.

State Ex Rel. West v. Frame

36 Okla. 159 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1912

Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Glazier

192 Okla. 516 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1943

Woolworth, 236 Pa. 496 , 84 Atl. 909 ; Rothstein v. Monette, 17 N. Y. S. 2d 369; Dunham v. White, 203 Minn. 82 , 279 N. W. 839 ; Frazier v. Mace-Ryer Co., 232 Mo. App. 811 , 114 S. W. 2d 150 ; Brown v. … In the latter case it was held: “Whether injury to pedestrian falling on slippery, inclined board crosswalk over alley was result of negligence of lessee of premises adjoining alley, and whether pedestrian was free from contributory

Fair School Finance Council of Oklahoma, Inc. v. State

746 P.2d 1135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1987

Rodriguez, supra note 31 , 411 U.S. at 29 , 93 S.Ct. at 1295 , quoting Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873 [1954]. . … Board of Com’rs. of Tulsa County, 185 Okl. 111 , 90 P.2d 442, 446 [1939] and Sanchez v. Melvin, Okl., 418 P.2d 639, 641 [1966]. . Elias v. City of Tulsa, Okl., 408 P.2d 517, 520 [1965]; State v.

R & R Engineering Co. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

737 P.2d 118 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1987

SIMMS, Justice: Appeal from the District Court of Rogers County, affirming an order by the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission Board of Review (Board), allowing payment of unemployment benefits to Gilbert V. Farris. … The general rule was most recently stated in Banking Board of the State of Oklahoma v.

SAFEWAY STORES, INCORPORATED v. Martin

530 P.2d 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1974

Jones v. Brown, 516 P. 2d 546, 548 (Okl.1973), Hiner v. Hugh Breeding Inc., 355 P.2d 549 (Okl.1960). … The convenience of the Browns in having the action tried in Oklahoma County is reduced to the convenience to Safeway and Herridge and their witnesses outweigh the convenience to the Browns.

City of Tulsa v. Smittle

702 P.2d 367 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1985

Huston v. Scott, 20 Okl. 142 , 94 P. 512 (1907). 6 . 535 P.2d 283 (Okl.1975), syllabus 2. 7 . 547 P.2d 374, 379 (Okl.1976); also see Abbott v. Board of Trustees of Oscar Rose, etc., 586 P.2d 1098, 1101 , (Okl.1978). 8 . … Wade v. Brown, 516 P.2d 526 (Okl.1973). 9 . United States v. Borden Co., 308 U.S. 188, 198 , 60 S.Ct. 182, 188 , 84 L.Ed. 181 (1939); also see U.S. v.

Commerce Trust Co. v. James

119 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1926

The law makes no presumption of agency, and the burden of proving agency, as well as the nature and extent thereof, rests upon the party alleging it (Bourland v. … Commerce Furniture & Undertaking Co. v. White Sewing Machine Co., 94 Okla. 299 , 222 Pac. 516 .

COUNTY COM'RS OF MUSKOGEE CO. v. Lowery

136 P.3d 639 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 2006

The Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. … Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 1997 OK 117, ¶ 18 , 946 P.2d 1140, 1144 .

B of E City Lawton v. School Dist. No. 49

28 Okla. 321 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1910

The eontrovers)” involved grew out' of substantially the following facts; November 20, 1905, on a written petition, the board of education of the city of Lawton made-an order attaching certain territory, which constituted … before us; but it is contended on the part of counsel for plaintiff that the averments of their petition were sustained, and’ that the proof offered showed conclusively that the petition and the evidence offered before the board

Cashman v. Browning

177 Okla. 446 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1936

Claussen v. Amberg, supra. In this case the applicant, A. L. Cashman, did not mail or attempt to mail any copy of the notice by publication to the owner, IT. T. Browning. … See Maine v. Edmonds, 58 Okla. 645 , 160 P. 483 .

MARSHALL v. CITY OF TULSA

558 P.3d 1220 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 2024

Bird v. Coleman , 1997 OK 44 939 P.2d 1123 Brown v. Okla. State Bank & Trust Co., 1993 OK 117 860 P.2d 230 Stuckey v. Young Exp. Co., 1978 OK 128 586 P.2d 726 ANALYSIS A. … Marshall relies upon the Court of Civil Appeals' ruling in Hass v. Money , 1993 OK CIV APP 38 849 P.2d 1106 Money , while owners were on vacation, they boarded their dog at an animal clinic. Id . ¶ 1, 849 P.2d at 1107 .

Ahlschlager v. LAWTON SCHOOL DIST.

242 P.3d 509 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 2010

Co. v. … Gens v.

McCullough v. School Dist. No. 37

118 Okla. 59 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1926

of the board. … The case is styled Brown v. School District, reported in 1 Kan. App. 530 , 40 Pac. 826 . The court was in error in entering judgment against the plaintiffs.

Garrett Company v. Collins

103 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

Battiest v. Wolf, 97 Okla. 215 , 223 Pac. 661 . … In the case of Wilson v.

Kelsey v. Dollarsaver Food Warehouse of Durant

65 O.B.A.J. 3781 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1994

Co. v. Brown, 45 Okl. 143 , 144 P. 1075, 1080-81 (1914). For a more detailed explanation, see the Partridge quotation infra note 15. … Brown, supra note 13 , 144 P. at 1080-81 ; Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. Shawler, 113 Ariz. 549, 555 , 558 P.2d 894, 900 (1976); Rack, supra, note 13 , 318 S.W.2d at 215 . .