Case law

State ex rel. Board of Tax Roll Corrections ex rel. Clay v. Mack Truck Sales of Tulsa, Inc.

620 P.2d 388 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1980

Plummer v. Davis, 169 Okla. 374, 376 , 36 P.2d 938, 941 (1934). … Couch v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 302 P.2d 117 (Okla.1956). .

Askins Properties, L.L.C. v. Oklahoma County Assessor

161 P.3d 303 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 2007

In re Estate of MacFarline, 2000 OK 87, ¶ 3 , 14 P.3d 651, 554-555 (quoting Carmichael v. Better, 1996 OK 48 , 914 P.2d 1051 , 1053 and citing Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , ¶ 22 n. 30, 989 P.2d 448 ). … Cartwright v.

IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF HIRD

2015 OK 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 2015

. ¶24 Jeff Brown, the Superintendent of Wright Christian Academy, also testified. He asked Hird to be on the board of the school his youngest son attended. … The board was aware of his criminal record. His service to the board has been very good. Brown spoke of the homeless woman Alyse who came to their church for help.

Frisco Lumber Co. v. Waldock

71 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1918

Combs v. Brown. 20 N. J. Law, 36; Mitchell v. Mitchell. 35 Miss. 108 ; Gibson v Stevens, 8 How. 384 12 L. Ed. 1123 . … Co. v.

Higginbotham v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.

155 Okla. 264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1932

In the case of Mauch v. Bennett & Brown *266 Lumber Co., 235 Mich. 496 , 209 N. W. 586 , in the syllabus it is said: “2. … In the case of Weaver v. Shankin Walnut Co.

Ellet-Kendall Shoe Co. v. Ross

28 Okla. 697 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

Finch et al. v. … Mosgrove v. Harris, 94 Cal. 162 , 29 Pac. 490 ; Martin v. Duncan, 156 Ill. 274 , 41 N. E. 43 ; Bank v. Gilbert, 174 Ill. 485 , 51 N. E. 584 , 66 Am. St. Rep. 306 ; Coombs v. Collins, 6 Idaho, 536 , 57 Pac. 310 .

Bell v. Davis

43 Okla. 221 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 18, 1914

See, also, Shirley v. Healds, 34 N. H. 407; Ward v. Brown, 53 W. Va. 227 , 44 S. E. 488 . … In Ward v. Brown, supra, it is held that an executor may propound the will and appeal from an order den)dng probate thereof.

CASHWAY LUMBER COMPANY v. Langston

479 P.2d 582 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1970

De Bolt v. Farmers’ Exchange Bank, supra; Goff v. Long-Bell Lumber Co., 142 Okl. 194 , 286 P. 1 (1930). See also Anderson et al. v. W. L. Oakes Mfg. Co., 197 F.2d 725 (10th Cir., 1952). Furthermore Mr. … Gibson v. Dunham, Okl., 346 P.2d 327 (1959).

County Assessor v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local No. 329

202 Okla. 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1949

Beta Theta Pi Corporation v. Board of Com’rs of Cleveland County, 108 Okla. 78 , 234 P. 354 . … In support of the statement in the text as to the purpose of labor unions two cases are cited, Brown v. Stoerkel, 74 Mich. 269 , 41 N. W. 921 , and Hudson v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry.

Keet & Roundtree Dry Goods Co. v. Rogers

57 Okla. 58 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 7, 1916

Brown, A.' J. … For further facts see Brown et al. v. Barker et al., 35 Okla. 498 , 130 Pac. 155 .

National Surety Co. v. Slover

132 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1928

We have carefully examined the cases cited by the plaintiff in support of his theory, to wit: Leyerle v. State (Okla. Cr.) 237 Pac. 871 ; Davis v. State, 30 Okla. Cr. 61 , 234 Pac. 727 ; Winston v. State, 16 Okla. … Cr. 648 , 185 Pac. 832 ; State v. King (Kan.) 206 Pac. 883 , 22 A. L. R. 1007; People v. Molineux, 62 L. R. A. 193, 168 N. Y. 264 ; Perkins v. State (Okla. Cr.) 250 Pac. 544 . In the case of People v.

Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. Pettie

196 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1945

Abernathy, local freight agent, and negatived the presence in the county of a designated service agent, the president, chairman of the board of trustees, cashier, secretary or managing agent. … In Oklahoma City v.

Brooks v. Baltz

71 O.B.A.J. 2578 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 2000

Board of Adjustment of the City of Tulsa, 1985 OK 70 , 706 P.2d 899 . … Joiner v. Brown, 1996 OK 112 , 925 P.2d 888, 890 .

Chancellor v. Tenneco Oil Co.

653 P.2d 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1982

Bailey v. Lovin, 202 Okl. 17 , 209 P.2d 994 (1949); Tucker v. Edwards, 376 P.2d 253 (Okl.1962); Brown v. Greever, 379 P.2d 689 (Okl.1963); Kunze v. Wilkerson, 426 P.2d 340 (Okl.1967); Littlefield v. … Gulfstream Petroleum Corp. v. Layden, Okl., 632 P.2d 376, 379 (1981); State exrel. Comm’rs of the Land Office v. Corporation Commission, Okl., 590 P.2d 674, 677 (1979); see also Scoufos v.

Sapulpa Petroleum Co. v. McCray

136 Okla. 269 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1929

Burnett wired McCray that the resolution had passed the board of directors of the Cushing Petroleum Company and mailed a purported resolution to McCray, but such was false. Birch C. … Bk., 93 Okla. 233 , 220 Pac. 909 ; Etenburn v. Neary, 77 Okla. 69 , 180 Pac. 457 ; Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 Pac. 417 ; Ellison v. Hodges, 71 Okla. 16 , 174 Pac. 1089 ; Bruner v.

Traders & General Insurance Company v. Harris

398 P.2d 843 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1965

Brown & Sons, Inc, et al. v. Savage et ■al., 208 Okl. 668 , 258 P.2d 183 ; Young et al. v. Postal Mutual Indemnity Co. et al., 189 Okl. 187 , 115 P.2d 139 ; Tri-State Casualty Ins. Co. v. … It is further undisputed that petitioner on March 7, 1963, sent a cancellation notice of the policy to the State Board •of Insurance effective March 5, 1963, for ■nonpayment of the premium and that the State Board of Insurance

Tara Petroleum Corp. v. Hughey

630 P.2d 1269 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1981

Gex v. Texas Co., 337 S.W.2d 820, 828 (Tex.Civ.App.1960); Texas Oil & Gas Corp. v. Vela, 405 S.W.2d 68, 73 (Tex.Civ.App.1966), quoted in Texas Oil & Gas Corp. v. … Gulf Oil Corp. v. State, 360 P.2d 933, 936 (Okl.1961); Wallace v.

Excise Board of Le Flore County v. St. Louis-S. F. R.

173 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1935

Woodrow v. Ewing

263 P.2d 167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1953

See discussions in Brown v. Trent, 36 Okl. 239 , 128 P. 895 ; Pettis v. Johnston, 78 Okl. 277 , 190 P. 681 . As said in Freeman on Judgments (5th Ed.) … Home Development Co. v. Hankins, 195 Okl. 632 , 159 P.2d 1013 ; Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okl. 170 , 192 P. 417 , and see Terrell v. Gotcher, 197 Okl. 650 , 174 P.2d 229 .

Stacy v. Browne

99 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1923

Central Mortgage Co. v. Michigan State Life Ins. Co., 13 Okla. 33 , 143 Pac. 175 , and cases cited. The evidence in the instant case, outside of the writing, corroborates the writing. Under Gast et al. v. … Armstrong v. Poland, 56 Okla. 663 , 156 Pac. 220 ; Dunn v. Modern Foundry & Machine Co., 51 Okla. 465 , 151 Pac. 893 .