Case law

Poindexter v. Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. No. 39

174 Okla. 192 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1935

Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469 , 106 P. 957 ; Delaware County v. Board of Com’rs of Delaware County, 56 Okla. 81 , 155 P. 881 . … See Swindall v. State Election Board et al., 96 Okla. 40 , 219 P. 942 ; Massey v. School District No. 58, Wagoner County, 101 Okla. 13 , 222 P. 674 ; Moore v. City of Perry et al., 110 Okla. 8 , 234 P. 625 ; Parrish v.

Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corp. of Oklahoma v. Ozment

434 P.2d 893 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1967

In Pure Oil Co. v. … ANDREWS, who with the aid and counsel of MART BROWN and HOWARD K. BERRY, as Special Masters, prepared a preliminary advisory opinion.

Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff's Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge Number 188 v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County

995 P.2d 1124 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 14, 2000

Said contracts shall be entered into for a period not to exceed fifty (50) years subject to annual appropriations by the county excise board. … Id. at V 16. . Id. at ¶ 18. . State ex rel. York v. Turpen, 1984 OK 26 , ¶ 7, 681 P.2d 763, 766 . . City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations Bd., 1995 OK 99, ¶ 29 , 904 P.2d 604, 613 . . Reherman v.

State Ex Rel. v. Buchanan

140 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1928

In the body of the opinion of the case of Board of Education of City of Alva v. … New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Board of Ed., Cons. School Dist. No. 1, 124 Okla. 101 , 253 P. 1012 .

Young v. First State Bank, Watonga

628 P.2d 707 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1981

Young relies on Browning v. … Sawyer v. Shick, 30 Okl. 353 , 120 P. 581 (1911). A distinction here, however, must be made. The holding in Browning v. Ray, supra, relies on a holding in Drakos v.

Hanska v. Hanska

395 P.2d 648 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1964

Also Brown and Whitten, 'Jr., were not parties to the suit. It therefore appears that the cited statute is no authority for allowance of the additional attorney fee. In Pierson v. … Co. v.

MULLENDORE v. MERCY HOSPITAL ARDMORE

2019 OK 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 2019

FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. CORP. COM'N Discussed 2003 OK 29 , 66 P.3d 432 , STATE ex rel. FENT v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD Discussed 2005 OK 30 , 112 P.3d 1175 , PAULS VALLEY TRAVEL CENTER v. … BOUCHER Discussed at Length 2006 OK 31 , 136 P.3d 639 , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MUSKOGEE COUNTY v. LOWERY Discussed 2006 OK 98 , 152 P.3d 861 , ZEIER v. ZIMMER, INC.

In Re Tax Levies of City of Woodward

143 Okla. 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1930

Perrine v. Bonaparte, 140 Okla. 165 , 282 P. 332 , and under that holding the action of the excise board was without authority of law and was a wrongful usurpation of power. … J., LESTER, V. C. J., and RILEY, J., absent. Note. — See "Municipal Corporations," 44 C. J. § 4115, p. 1160, n. 39; § 4116, p. 1160, n. 48; § 4120, p. 1164, n. 33; § 4369, p. 1312, n. 88.

Welch v. Ayres

190 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1942

Ayres, as chairman of the board of county commissioners, and the board of county commissioners, as defendants. … (Notice in this connection McBride v. Cowan, 80 Okla. 72 , 194 P. 208 ; Cook v. Search, 100 Okla. 45 , 226 P. 1039 ; Walker v. Bahnsen, 115 Okla. 195 , 241 P. 740 ; Commonwealth Co. v.

Wolber v. Rose

92 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1923

A. 297; (Ark. 1857) Clark v. Latham, 25 Ark. 16 ; (Cal. 1863) Jansen v. McCahill, 22 Cal. 583 , 83 Am. Dec. 84 ; (Ga. 1857) Reinhart v. Miller, 22 Ga. 402 , 68 Am. Dec. 506 ; (Ill. 1859; Handyside v. … Co. v. Brown, 30 N. J. Eq. (3 Stew.) 193; (Pa. 1896) Fitzpatrick v. Engard, 175 Pa. 393 , 34 Atl. 803 .

Tulsa Rig Reel & Mfg. Co. v. Hansell

69 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1918

. * * *” The fact the bond runs to the board of education instead of the state of Oklahoma does not invalidate it. Dolese Bros. Co. v. Chaney, etc., 44 Okla. 745 , 145 Pac. 1119 ; Thompson v. Grider Imp. … Brown, J., in Buffalo v. Balcom, 134 N. Y. 532 , 32 N. E. 7 . And see Boehmer v. Schuylkill County, 46 Pa. 452 ; Rensselaer County v. Bates, 17 N. Y. 242 ; Mississippi County v. Jackson, 51 Mo. 23 ; McLean v.

King v. State Ex Rel. Gossett

126 Okla. 130 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 2, 1927

In the ease of Cleal et al. v. … Brown v. Hallaway’s Estate, 47 Colo. 461 , 108 Pac. 25 ; Ex parte Sharp, 15 Idaho, 120 , 96 Pac. 563 , 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 886; State v. District Court, 38 Mont. 119 , 99 Pac. 139 ; Garcia v.

Tulsa County Excise Board v. St. Louis -S. F. R. Co.

180 Okla. 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1937

One of the questions raised in this connection has been decided by this court on this date in the case of Tulsa County Excise Board v. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Company et al., 180 Okla. 287 , 68 P. (2d) 861 . … Co., 164 Okla. 230 25 P. (2d) 960 ; People v. Knopf, 183 Ill. 410 , 56 N. E. 155 ; Crookall v. Mathews, 61 N. J. L. 349, 39 Atl. 659 , and Board of Education of Ogden City v.

Ross v. Breene

88 Okla. 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1922

Brown v. Trent et al., 36 Okla. 239 , 128 Pac. 895 ; McIntosh v. Holtgrave et al., 79 Okla. 63 . 191 Pac. 739 ; Griffin v. Culp, 68 Okla. 310 . 174 Pac. 495 . In the case of McIntosh v. Holtgrave et al., supra, Mr. … Brown et al. v. Trent et al., supra; U. S. v. Thockmorton et al., 98 U. S. 61 , 25 L. Ed. 93 .

Conservative Loan Co. v. Saulsbury

75 Okla. 194 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1919

Co. v. … . & Lighting Co., 34 Okla. 730 , 126 Pac. 1025 and cases cited; Cunningham v. Cromley, 54 Okla. 266 , 153 Pac. 860 ; Brown v. Goulding, 55 Okla. 320 ; Pinksto et al. v.

Taylor v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

981 P.2d 1253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1999

Schmidt v. United States, 1996 OK 29 , 912 P.2d 871, 873 ; Brown v. Ford, 1995 OK 101 , 905 P.2d 223, 226 ; Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp., 1993 OK 131 , 863 P.2d 1176 , 1178 n. 3; Shebester v. … Browning-Ferris, 1992 OK 72 , 833 P.2d 1218, 1225-1226 ; Silver v. Slasher, 1988 OK 53 , 770 P.2d 878, 884 ; State Mut. Life Assur. Co. of Amer. v.

Brooks v. Garner

20 Okla. 236 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1908

School Board v. Tromble, 33 La. Ann. 1073 ; Nunez v. Bayhi, 52 La. Ann. 1719, 28 South. 349 ; Pruyn v. Young, 51 La. Ann. 320 , 25 South. 125 . … Bowman v. McElroy, 15 La. Ann. 663 ; 1 Greenleaffs Evidence, § 79; Ice Co. v. Ermann, 36 La. Ann. 841 .” In the case of Brown v.

Walker v. OAK CLIFF VOLUNTEER FIRE PROT.

807 P.2d 762 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1990

Sanders, 734 P.2d 1290, 1292 (Okla. 1987). [22] Wade v. Brown, 516 P.2d 526, 528 (Okla. 1973); In re Guardianship of Campbell, 450 P.2d 203, 205 (Okla.1966). [23] Cook v. … Waltner, 340 Mo. 137 , 100 S.W.2d 272, 275 (1936); Ewing v. Harries, 68 Utah 452 , 250 P. 1049, 1050 (1926); Brown v. Randolph County Court, 45 W.Va. 827 , 32 S.E. 165, 167 (1899). [26] See, State ex rel. Cameron v.

Craig v. Unknown Heirs, Executors, Administrators, Devisees, Trustees & Assigns, Immediate & Remote, of Craig

358 P.2d 835 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1961

However, they urge application to this case of the same principles applied in Rose v. Board of Directors of School Dist. … Hamilton v. Brown, 31 Okl. 213 , 120 P. 950, 951 . On account of this error, said court should have sustained plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial.

Daily Leader v. Cameron, Auditor

3 Okla. 677 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1895

In the case of Brown v. Turner et al. 70 N. C. 99 , the supreme court of that state said: “As was said of the word ‘contract,’ we say that there is no magic in the word ‘office.’ … In McAunich v.