Case law

Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. Lovelace

184 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1938

He was adjusting a board from the top of a 210-barrel stocb tanb across a four-inch line running from the settling tanb to the stocb tanb, and had crawled out on the board to put on a Sbinner pipe joint clamp, when the connections … Shawnee Cotton Oil Co. v. Bumgarner, 180 Okla. 103 , 67 P.2d 959 ; Eubanks v. Barnsdall Oil Co., 169 Okla. 31 , 35 P.2d 873 ; Fox v. Brown, 176 Okla. 201 , 55 P.2d 129 . In Shawnee Cotton Oil Co. v.

Gungoll v. Elsberry

177 Okla. 301 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1936

Brooks v. Tucker, 89 Okla. 255 , 201 P. 643 ; Atkinson v. King, 93 Okla. 37 , 219 P. 914 ; National Bond & Inv. Co. v. Central Nat. Bank, 142 Okla. 96 , 285 P. 828 . The Gungolls urge that they are bona fide purchasers. … until after acouiring the lease from Brown. Plaintiff offered no evidence, and there is none otherwise, to refute the foregoing facts. In Davis v.

Choctaw County v. Bateman

208 Okla. 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1952

Swift & Co. v. Brown, 202 Okla. 572 , 216 P. 2d 294 . We have noticed the cases from other jurisdictions treating of the evidence required to sustain a finding as to the disability. Among them are: Woods v. W. E. … Swift & Co. v. Brown, supra. In Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Montgomery, 148 Okla. 145 , 297 P. 240 , the evidence to sustain a finding that hernia resulted from strain was in question.

Ex Parte Dagley

35 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1912

Dagley before the insanity board. It is then charged that the husband of Mrs. … Rep. 545 ; People v. Baker, 59 Misc. Rep. 359 , 110 N. Y. Supp. 848 ; In re Brown, 39 Wash. 160 , 81 Pac. 552 , 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 540, 109 Am. St. Rep. 868 , 4 Ann. Cas. 488; State v.

Duncan v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections

75 O.B.A.J. 1893 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 2004

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 1984 OK CIV APP 58 , 1121, 696 P.2d 1046, 1050 ; Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … Lovett, supra note 8 , 328 U.S. at 315 , 66 S.Ct. at 1079 ; Brown, supra note 9 , 381 U.S. at 447 , 85 S.Ct. at 1714 ; Cooper v. Henslee, 257 Ark. 963 , 522 S.W.2d 391, 400 (1975)(Fogleman, J., concurring). .

Privett v. Bd. of Com'rs of Grant County

44 Okla. 523 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

Anderson v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 143 Pac. 1145 ; Huntington et al. v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 385 ; Zeigler v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 381 ; Orendorff v. … Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 383 ; Hamilton et al. v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 386 ; Russell v. Board of Comm issioners, ante, 144 Pac. 580 ; Walker v.

Harper County Excise Board v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

192 Okla. 701 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 3, 1943

This is an appeal by Harper County, Okla., Excise Board against Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company from an order of the Court of Tax Review entered on the 23rd day of December, 1942. … The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Harper County Excise Board v. Phillips Pipe Line Co., 192 Okla. 700 , 140 P. 2d 596 , this day decided, and the syllabus in that cause is adopted as the syllabus herein.

Young v. Severy, Assignee

5 Okla. 630 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1897

Severy, applied to the said board of trustees in compliance with the rules providing for the regulation of proceedings of the said board for a title to the said lots, and complied with the regulations and rules of said board … Co. v. Duffy, 2 Kan. 347 ; Polster v. Rucker, 16 Kan. 115 ; Moody v. Arthur, id . 419; Reeve v. Downs, 22 Kan. 330 ; Grandstaff v. Brown, 23 Kan. 176 ; Clay v. Hildebrand, 34 Kan. 694 , 9 P. 466 ; Schenk v.

Newhouse v. Alexander

27 Okla. 46 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1909

In Kirkpatrick v. Board of Can., etc., 53 W. Va. 275 , 44 S. … McDowell, 83 Cal. 70 , 23 Pac. 183 ; Sego v. Stoddard, 136 Ind. 297 , 36 N. E. 204 , 22 L. R. A. 468; Kreitz v. Behrensmeyer, 125 Ill. 141 , 17 N. E. 232 [ 8 Am. St. Rep. 349 ].” In Mauck v. Brown, 59 Neb. 382 , 81 N.

McLaurin v. People's State Bank

95 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1923

Co. v. School Board of School Dist. … . & Lighting Co., 34 Okla. 730 , 126 Pac. 1025 ; Cunningham v. Cromley, 54 Okla. 266 , 153 Pac. 860 ; Brown v. Goulding, 55 Okla. 320 , 155 Pac. 559 ; Pinkston et al. v. Marlow, 58 Okla. 280 , 159 Pac. 488 ; M., K. & T.

Taliaferro v. Shahsavari

154 P.3d 1240 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 2006

Propst v. Alexander, see note 6, supra; Strubhart v. Perry Memorial Hosp. Trust Auth., see note 8, supra. 11 . Public Serv. Co. v. Brown, see note 5, supra at ¶7; Lindsay v. … Capshaw v. Gulf Ins. Co., see note 6, supra; Public Serv. Co. v. Brown, see note 5, supra at ¶7; Propst v. Alexander, see note 6, supra. 43 . Negrate v.

Clapsaddle v. Blevins

66 P.3d 352 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 2003

Simpson v. … Fite v. Lacey, 1984 OK 83 , 691 P.2d 901 , Baggett v. State Election Board, 1972 OK 132 , 501 P.2d 817, 821 , Wagoner County Election Board v. Plunkett, 1956 OK 329 , 305 P.2d 525, 529-530 , Brown v.

Horath v. Pierce

506 P.2d 548 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1973

In Wood v. … McCain v.

Haught v. Continental Oil Co.

192 Okla. 345 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1943

Meddis v. Wilson, 175 Mo. 126 , 74 S. W. 984 . See, also, Quelch v. Futch (N.C.) 93 S. E. 899 ; Hughes v. Brown (Tenn.) 8 L.R.A. 480 ; Doyle v. Wade, 23 Fla. 90 , 1 So. 516 ; Streeter v. Graham & Norton Co., 263 N. … E. 150 ; Luft v. Factory Mutual Liability Ins. Co., 51 R. I. 452, 155 Atl. 526 , 83 A.L.R. 745 ; Murphy v. Board of Supervisors, 205 Iowa, 256 , 215 N. W. 744 ; Colby v.

Black v. Ball Janitorial Service, Inc.

730 P.2d 510 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1986

In Reirdon v. Wilburton Board of Education, 6 we upheld the constitutionality of the Act’s notice requirement. … Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, Okl., 679 P.2d 1296, 1300 [1984]; Kimery v. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma, Okl., 622 P.2d 1066, 1069 [1981] and Earnest, Inc. v.

WHIPPLE v. PHILLIPS AND SONS TRUCKING

2020 OK 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 2020

Const. art. 23 §7, see pages 2-3, supra; Riley v. Brown and Root , Inc ., see note 2, supra; Hughes Drilling Co . v. Crawford , see note 2, supra; Roberts v. Merrill , see note 2, supra; Osmond v. … KELLEY Discussed 2011 OK 104 , 273 P.3d 31 , WEST v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE COUNTY Discussed 1980 OK 74 , 610 P.2d 794 , Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Smith Discussed 1980 OK 161 , 619 P.2d 608 , Abel v.

Luschen v. Stanton

192 Okla. 454 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1943

In Noe v. … In Payne v.

Williamson-Halsell-Frazier Co. v. State Ex Rel. Tradesmen's State Bank

68 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1918

Southern Surety Co. v. Waits, 45 Okla. 513 , 146 Pac. 431 ; Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Davis, 53 Okla. 332 , 156 Pac. 213 ; Lusk v. Porter, 53 Okla. 294 , 156 Pac. 224 ; Board Com’rs v. … In Leedy v.

Poindexter v. Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. No. 39

174 Okla. 192 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1935

Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469 , 106 P. 957 ; Delaware County v. Board of Com’rs of Delaware County, 56 Okla. 81 , 155 P. 881 . … See Swindall v. State Election Board et al., 96 Okla. 40 , 219 P. 942 ; Massey v. School District No. 58, Wagoner County, 101 Okla. 13 , 222 P. 674 ; Moore v. City of Perry et al., 110 Okla. 8 , 234 P. 625 ; Parrish v.

State Ex Rel. v. Buchanan

140 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1928

In the body of the opinion of the case of Board of Education of City of Alva v. … New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Board of Ed., Cons. School Dist. No. 1, 124 Okla. 101 , 253 P. 1012 .