Case law

Pine v. State Industrial Com.

148 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1931

See, also, Schild v. Pere Marquette R. Co. (1918) 200 Mich. 614 , 166 N. W. 1018 ; Podkastelnea v. Mich. Cent. R. Co. (1917) 164 N. W. 418 ; Brown v. Weston-Mott Co., 202 Mich. 592 , 168 N. W. 437 ; Stein v. … Haiseldon v. Indus. Bo. of Ill. (Ill.) 113 N. E. 877 ; Conway v. Indus. Board (Ill.) 118 N. E. 705 ; Moustgaard v. Indus. Comm. (Ill.) 122 N. E. 49 ; Bushnell v. Indus. Bo. (Ill.) 114 N.

Griffin v. Thomas

86 Okla. 70 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1922

Among the latter are Ashley v. Board of Supervisors, 60 Fed. 55 ; Speer v. Board of County Commissioners of Kearney County, 88 Fed. 749 ; State ex rel. v. Town of Dover, 62 N. J. L. 138; The Coast Co. v. … Caldwell v. Hooker, 22 Okla. 712 , 98 Pac. 964 ; Leedy v. Brown, 27 Okla. 487 , 113 Pac. 177 ; Atwater v. Hassett, 27 Okla. 292 , 111 Pac. 802 ; In re Lee, 64 Okla. 310 , 168 Pac. 58 ; Dunlap v.

Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n

624 P.2d 1049 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1981

It should first be presented to the Board of Governors. … In re Integration of State Bar of Oklahoma, 185 Okl. 505 , 95 P.2d 113 [1939]; Ford v. Board of Tax-Roll Corrections, Okl., 431 P.2d 423 [1967]. 4 .

State Ex Rel. Edwards v. Millar

21 Okla. 448 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1908

Justice Brown in the case of Davis v. Burke, 179 U. S. 399 , 21 Sup. Ct. 210, 45 L. Ed. 249 : “Where a constitutional provision is complete in itself it needs no further legislation to put it in force. … It is held in Talley City Salt Co. v. Brown, 7 W. Va. 191 , that the expression “public utility” is synonymous with “public use.” In Aldridge v. Tuscumbia, C. & D. R. R. Co., 2 Stew. & P. (Ala.) 199, 23 Am.

Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Lincoln County

185 Okla. 435 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

This cause was tried in the Court of Tax Review under the same record as made, in Excise Board of Lincoln County et al. v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. et al., No. 29120, 185 Okla. 436 , 93 P.2d 1081 . … J., and WELCH, V. C. J., dissent.

In Re the Assessment for the Year 2000 of Certain Property Owned by Oneok Field Services Gathering, LLC

38 P.3d 900 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 2001

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , 989 P.2d 448, 455 . . Id. . In Re Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co., 1914 OK 261 , 43 Okla. 307 , 142 P. 997 . . Oklahoma Industries Authority v. … McLoud Telephone Company v. State Board of Equalization, 1982 OK 154 , 655 P.2d 1037 .

Bd. of Trustees of Town of Taloga v. Hadson Etc.

574 P.2d 1038 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1978

Town believes these townsites must be treated in a different manner than a platting created after the land was already settled, citing Brown v. Parker, 2 Okl. 258 , 39 P. 567 (1894). … In Folsom v.

KENKEL v. PARKER

362 P.3d 1145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 2015

Brown, see note 11, supra; Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. Goforth, 1943 OK 244, 110 , 143 P.2d 154, 156 . … Fanning v. Brown, see note 11, supra; Saut bine v. Keller, see note 11, supra; State ex rel. Okla. Employment Sec. Com'n v. Tulsa Flower Exchange, see note 11, supra. . Fanning v.

Rivas v. Parkland Manor

12 P.3d 452 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 2000

Brown v. Lillard, 1991 OK 74 , 814 P.2d 1040, 1042-43 . … Brown, 814 P.2d at 1042-43 ; State, ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v.

McElhiney v. Lewis

88 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1923

Lewis, as plaintiff, commenced an action in the district court of Harper county against the board of county commissioners to recover the sum of $250, alleged to be the balance due him as salary as county attorney of said … Then follows a provision making it the duty of the State Board of Equalization to issue to the board of county commissioners, of the last named class of counties, a certificate of that fact. *211 The plaintiff's petition

Allen v. Transok Pipe Line Company

552 P.2d 375 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1976

In Ossman v. … Other authorities supporting this rule are: Dickinson v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co., 137 F.2d 615 (10 Cor. 1943); Vinson v. Oklahoma City, 179 Okl. 590 , 66 P.2d 933 (1937), and Colclazier v.

State Nat. Bank v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County

72 Okla. 46 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1919

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing an appeal from an order of the county board of equalization, made in pursuance of the mandate of the state board of equalization. … This statute was under consideration in Bretz v. El Reno State Bank, 71 Okla. 283 , 177 Pac. 362 .

Shirazi v. Childtime Learning Center, Inc.

204 P.3d 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 24, 2009

Logan County Election Board, 2001 OK 52 , 29 P.3d 543 , to the extent that they conflicted with Kruchowski and our decision in Saint. However, we left undisturbed our previous decision of Vasek v. … In Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , ¶19, 833 P.2d 1218 , we stated that Oklahoma law allows only one recovery to make a plaintiff whole. See also J.C. Houck v.

Payne County v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

185 Okla. 32 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1939

WELCH, V. O. J. This appeal presents the question of whether section 12313, O. S. 1931, 68 Okla. St.

Dale v. Board of Education of the City of Guthrie

51 Okla. 592 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1915

The jury found in favor of the board of education, and- gave judgment for the plaintiffs for the sum of $100, the amount tendered by the board. … Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Ruth v. Walker

122 Okla. 95 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1926

Ruth, Relator, v. Art Walker, W. C. McAlister, and Claud Baker, as the State Election Board of the State of Oklahoma, and C. C. Childers, Respondents.” The parties are referred to, therefore, as relator and respondents. … The only authority cited in support of relator’s contention from this court is the case of United States v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Company, 3 Okla. 471 , 41 Pac. 729 .

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

897 P.2d 1116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1995

Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Lawton, 523 P.2d 1064, 1065-1066 (Okla.1974). … Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Lawton, 523 P.2d 1064 (Okla.1974), (Supreme Court affirmed declaratory judgment and injunction against Board). Cf. Oklahoma Publishing Co., v.

American St. of Boynton v. Bd. of Com'rs of Muskogee

143 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1930

In the case of Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. … LESTER, V. O. J., not participating. MASON, C. J., absent.

Stallcup v. Board of Trustees of Firemen's R. & P. Fund

188 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1940

The decision of the board on the question of fact was not contrary to the evidence. … In re Application of Gruber, 89 Okla. 148 , 214 P. 690 ; Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief & Pension Fund in and for City of Tulsa v. Naughton, 180 Okla. 270 , 68 P. 2d 845 .

Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co. v. State Board of Equalization

170 Okla. 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1935

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization et al., cause No. 24271, this day decided ( 179 Okla. 517 , 41 P. [2d] 453 ), having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.