Case law

In Re Kohpay's Estate

206 Okla. 548 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1952

Brown, 185 Okla. 234 , 90 P. 2d 1071 , that the Globe Indemnity Company case and the case of Bruce v. … The case of Tucker v.

Texas- Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County

191 Okla. 586 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1942

Co. v. … v.

TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC

2014 OK 106 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 2014

In Brown v. … GANT Discussed 2002 OK 76, 60 P.3d 497, IGLEHART v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ROGERS COUNTY Discussed at Length 2003 OK 90, 89 P.3d 1022, HOLLAWAY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v. Dickson Oil Co.

196 Okla. 495 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1946

Our conclusion here seems well supported by the following authorities cited by the commission: Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Board et al., 128 N. J. L. 611, 27 Atl. 2d 889; Raines v. … Welch & Brown, 187 Okla. 470 , 103 P. 2d 533 .

Fabric Fire Hose Co. v. Board of Trustees of Haworth

115 Okla. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1925

O’Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of Ryan et al., 32 Okla. 738 , 124 Pac. 19 ; Campbell v. State ex rel., 23 Okla. 109 , 99 Pac. 778 ; City of Ardmore v. State ex rel., 24 Okla. 862 , 104 Pac. 913 .

Downing v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n

178 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1936

In Bentley v. … To the same effect on a similar statute, see Allen v. Brown, 6 Kan. App. 704 , 50 P. 505 . See, also, 14A C. J. 536.

Clark v. O'Toole

20 Okla. 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1908

In Brown, Administrator, v. … E. 16 ; Allerton v. Allerton, 50 N. Y. 670 ; Vail v. Reynolds, 118 N. Y. 302 , 23 N. E. 301 ; Shuee v. Shuee, 100 Ind. 477 ; Hopkins v. Snedaker, 71 Ill. 449 ; Whelan v. Reilly, 61 Mo. 565 ; Thomas v.

Excise Board of Noble County v. Stanolind Pipe Line Co.

183 Okla. 45 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1938

Co. v. … In Albrecht v.

OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

394 P.3d 1224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 2017

Richardson v. Board of Appeals of Chilmark, 81 Mass.App.Ct. 912 , 969 N.E.2d 727 (2012). . Richardson v. Board of Appeals of Chilmark, 969 N.E.2d at 730 . . Clarke v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Sheel

206 Okla. 330 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1952

Smith, 124 Okla. 71 , 254 P. 14 ; Galt-Brown Co. v. Lay, 183 Okla. 87 , 80 P. 2d 567 .” … Plaintiff in his brief seeks to distinguish Midland Oil Co. v. Ball and Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Carter, supra, for the reason that in Midland Oil Co. v.

School Dist. No. 18, Garvin Co. v. Thompson

24 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1909

Board of Education of Cartersville et al. v. Purse, Next Friend, et al., 101 Ga. 422 , 28 S. E. 896 , 41 L. R. A. 593, 65 Am. St. Rep. 312 . … Donahoe v.

Johnson v. Ward

541 P.2d 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1975

Wade v. Brown, Okl., 516 P.2d 526 , Letteer v. Conservancy Dist., Okl., 385 P.2d 796 . … State Election Board, 203 Okl. 356 , 221 P.2d 774 ; Bond v. Phelps, 200 Okl. 70 , 191 P.2d 938 . Section 1302, supra, was originally adopted as § 4 of Senate Bill 300, 1945, OSL, Ch. 1c.

State Ex Rel. Edwards v. Millar

21 Okla. 448 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1908

Justice Brown in the case of Davis v. Burke, 179 U. S. 399 , 21 Sup. Ct. 210, 45 L. Ed. 249 : “Where a constitutional provision is complete in itself it needs no further legislation to put it in force. … It is held in Talley City Salt Co. v. Brown, 7 W. Va. 191 , that the expression “public utility” is synonymous with “public use.” In Aldridge v. Tuscumbia, C. & D. R. R. Co., 2 Stew. & P. (Ala.) 199, 23 Am.

Sellers v. Corporation Commission

624 P.2d 1061 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 24, 1981

Sellers seeks to vacate a forced pooling order of the Corporation Commission [Order No. 140283] because he asserts: 1) the applicant, Curt Brown Drilling Co., appellee, did not unconditionally propose to drill a well on the … Anderson v. Corporation Commission, 327 P.2d 699, 703 (Olk.1958); Superior Oil Co. v. Corporation Commission, 206 Okl. 213 , 242 P.2d 454 (1952); Croxton v. State, 186 Okl. 249 , 97 P.2d 11 (1939).

Wilson v. State

169 Okla. 149 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1934

Treas., v. Brown (Iowa) 125 N. W. 248 . … Anderson v. Ritterbusch, 22 Okla. 761 , 98 P. 1002 ; Travis v. Dickey, 96 Okla. 256 , 222 P. 527 .

Young v. MacY

21 P.3d 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 2001

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , 989 P.2d 448, 455 . In a de novo review we have plenary, independent and non-deferential authority to determine whether the trial court erred in its application of the law. Kluver v. … Court Fund of Tulsa County v. Cook, 1976 OK 180 , 557 P.2d 875 . Claims against the Court Fund must be presented to the Court Fund Board. Board of Law Library Trustees of Oklahoma County v.

State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Cole

236 P.3d 49 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 2009

Board of Cty. Comm’rs of Creek County v. Casteel, 1974 OK 31, ¶ 15 , 522 P.2d 608, 611 . Whether additional pleadings may be filed rests in the discretion of the trial court. Rummage v. State ex rel. … Dept, of Highways v.

Equalization Bd. Okla. Cty. v. Ford Motor

177 Okla. 583 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1936

Defendants contend that plaintiff’s only remedy is by appeal from the decision of the equalization board, this upon the theory that the matter was heard and determined by that board. … The board here refused to hear and determine, and therefore there was no determination from which to appeal. As concerns the legal questions involved, this case has much in common with State ex rel. v.

Pine v. State Industrial Com.

148 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1931

See, also, Schild v. Pere Marquette R. Co. (1918) 200 Mich. 614 , 166 N. W. 1018 ; Podkastelnea v. Mich. Cent. R. Co. (1917) 164 N. W. 418 ; Brown v. Weston-Mott Co., 202 Mich. 592 , 168 N. W. 437 ; Stein v. … Haiseldon v. Indus. Bo. of Ill. (Ill.) 113 N. E. 877 ; Conway v. Indus. Board (Ill.) 118 N. E. 705 ; Moustgaard v. Indus. Comm. (Ill.) 122 N. E. 49 ; Bushnell v. Indus. Bo. (Ill.) 114 N.

Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Lincoln County

185 Okla. 435 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

This cause was tried in the Court of Tax Review under the same record as made, in Excise Board of Lincoln County et al. v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. et al., No. 29120, 185 Okla. 436 , 93 P.2d 1081 . … J., and WELCH, V. C. J., dissent.