Case law

Johnson v. Moser

181 Okla. 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1937

On August 2, 1935, the defendant cited the plaintiff to appear before her and show cause why he should not be removed as clerk of said school board. … Stites, 70 Okla. 177 , 173 P. 449 ; Goad v. Brown, 73 Okla. 241 , 175 P. 767 .

State ex rel. State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors v. Engineered Coatings, Inc.

542 P.2d 508 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1975

State v. Board of Education of Independent School District No 74 of Muskogee County, 206 Okl. 699 , 246 P.2d 368 (1952); Swatek Construction Company v. Williams, 177 Okl. 305 , 58 P.2d 585 (1935); Good v. … HODGES, V. C. J., and DAVISON, BERRY, LAVENDER, BARNES, SIMMS and DOOLIN, JJ., concur. WILLIAMS, C. J., dissents.

Le Flore County v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

185 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

The protestant relies upon Excise Board of Stephens County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 168 Okla. 523 , 34 P.2d 268 , as supporting its contention above stated. … It is contended that the judgments were taken under the rules of law announced in the case of Smartt v.

Prange Investment Co. v. Board of Com'rs of McCurtain County

181 Okla. 524 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1938

No action for such refund shall be commenced after the expiration of five (5) years from the time a tax deed might have been applied for, had the sale been valid,” The case of Savery v. Board of Co. … BAYLESS, V. C. J., 'and GIBSON, J., absent.

North v. McMahan

26 Okla. 502 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1910

Brooks v. … Board of County Com’rs, 33 Kan. 202 , 6 Pac. 311 , 52 Am. Rep. 526 ; State ex rel. Johnston v.

Bryan, Co. v. Board of Education of City of Perry

7 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1898

.: The questions involved, with one or two exceptions, have been passed upon by the court at this term in the case of School District v. … effective to the extent of the territorial apportionment fund, set aside to the school district here complaining. *165 It was also contended in this cause that the complainant below was under the control and management of the board

Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Logan County

179 Okla. 48 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1937

McKee v. … Delaware County Excise Board v. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co., 173 Okla. 574 , 49 P. (2d) 523 .”

Simpson v. Dixon

64 O.B.A.J. 1721 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1993

These boards must conduct elections in the manner prescribed by uniform state law. Extant jurisprudence, Lackey v. State ex rel. Grant 47 and State ex rel. Short v. … For other applications of § 46’s uniformity mandate, see Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., Okl., 833 P.2d 1218, 1229 (1992); Massey v. Farmers Ins.

One Buick Automobile, Model D. 44 v. State

72 Okla. 255 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1919

On September 23, 1918, the sheriff of Logan county, by his deputy, filed his verified return in the district court of said county, reciting that he had seized the Buick automobile roadster, and arrested one Ofa Brown, who … The questions urged in this case are identical with those presented in No. 10424, One Cadillac Automobile v.

Board of Ed., City of Wilson v. Liberty Nat. Bank

197 Okla. 596 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1946

A motion to dismiss the appeal, based upon the rule announced in Barrick v. Smith, 77 Okla. 163 , 187 P. 199 , and Dixon v. … See City of Sulphur v. State, 62 Okla. 312 , 162 P. 744 ; Hamilton Tp. v. Underwood, 81 Okla. 256 , 198 P. 300 ; State Bank of Miami v. City of Miami 43 Okla. 809 , 144 P. 597 ; Excise Bd., Creek County, v.

Bd. of Com'rs of Cleveland v. Stogner, Clerk of Court

57 Okla. 709 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1916

compel Jim Stog-ner, court clerk of Cleveland county, Okla., to certify and file, as required by law, a transcript of the record in a certain cause then pending in the county court of Cleveland county, Okla., wherein the board … In McCullough et al. v.

Fulsom-Morris Coal & Mining Co. v. Mitchell

37 Okla. 575 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1913

Co. v. Marks, 11 Okla. 82 , 65 Pac. 996 ; Citizens’ Bank v. Garnett, 21 Okla. 200 , 95 Pac. 775 ; Coalgate Co. v. Hurst, 25 Okla. 588 , 107 Pac. 658 ; Finch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 . … Hampton and Moore boarded with Mrs. Garrison, where plaintiff boarded and roomed, and where they had full opporunity to become informed of his physical condition.

Smith v. Beam

176 Okla. 408 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1936

In the case of Whitehair et al. v. … Thompson v. Renfrow, 148 Okla. 8 , 296 P. 404 ; Reynolds v. Reynolds, 148 Okla. 13 , 296 P. 962 ; Weeks v. Davis, 148 Okla. 230 , 298 P. 267 .

Lewis v. Aubrey

404 P.2d 1005 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1965

Wells, 79 Okl. 39 , 191 P. 186 , Methvin v. Methvin, 191 Okl. 177 , 127 P.2d 186 , and Coppedge v. Clinton, U.S.C.A., 10th Cir., 72 F.2d 531 . Notice, also, Board of County Commissioners v. … Brown, 100 Cal. 626 , 35 P. 323 , and Brown v. Campbell, 100 Cal. 635 , 35 P. 433 , 38 Am.St.Rep. 314 , described in Footnote 17, page 988).

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation v. Warren

975 P.2d 900 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 1998

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 1984 OK CIV APP 58 , 696 P.2d 1046, 1050 ; Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Seely, 1980 OK 1989 , 621 P.2d 534, 538-39 (Opala, J., concurring in result). . … Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 1996 OK 41 , 913 P.2d 1339, 1350 (Opala, J., concurring); Ross v.

Board of Equalization of Kingfisher Co. v. Hennessey State Bank

102 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1924

On a regular hearing before the board of equalization, the board sustained the assessment as made and the bank and stockholders duly appealed to the district court. … It knew that the only method of changing a valuation fixed by the county board of equalization was by appeal and that no question could be reviewed on appeal not presented to the board. Atoka County v.

Noble v. City of Bethany

206 Okla. 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1951

In Browne v. … Co. v.

Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Smith

181 Okla. 313 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1937

We have said in Kansas Explorations, Inc., v. … Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 P. 785 ; Fain Drilling Co. v. Deatherage, 179 Okla. 409 , 65 P. (2d) 1212 ; Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Satterfield, supra. The award is affirmed. OSBORN, C.

Sellers v. Corporation Commission

624 P.2d 1061 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 24, 1981

Sellers seeks to vacate a forced pooling order of the Corporation Commission [Order No. 140283] because he asserts: 1) the applicant, Curt Brown Drilling Co., appellee, did not unconditionally propose to drill a well on the … Anderson v. Corporation Commission, 327 P.2d 699, 703 (Olk.1958); Superior Oil Co. v. Corporation Commission, 206 Okl. 213 , 242 P.2d 454 (1952); Croxton v. State, 186 Okl. 249 , 97 P.2d 11 (1939).

City Nat. Bank v. Board of Ed., City of Norman

184 Okla. 441 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1939

Defendant admitted receiving deposits of school board money amounting to $121,356.79. … sec. 167, p. 561, states: “A bank may be held liable for the wrongful act of its officers and agents done in connection with the business of the bank and in the exercise of their apparent authority. * * *” Salt Lake City v.