Case law

Goff v. Goff

124 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1926

However, this court decided on April 5, 1921, in the case of Pigeon v. … Board of County Com’rs of Kay County v. State of Kansas, 19 Okla. 375 , 91 Pac. 699 ; Okla. Moline Plow Co. v. Smith, 81 Okla. 16 , 196 Pac. 962 ; Brown v. Calvert, 57 Okla. 364 , 157 Pac. 284 ; Johnson v.

Curtis v. Bd. of Commr. of Sequoyah Cty.

33 Okla. 471 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1912

Laws 1909, entitled "An act to enable counties, municipal corporations, the boards of education of any city or school districts to refund their indebtedness." … There is no provision authorizing such a remonstrance to be heard before the board of county commissioners.

Hudgins v. Foster

131 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1928

The case of Burks v. … Mill v.

Western Paving v. Bd. of Com'rs of Lincoln

183 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1938

In Brown v. … Nolen v. Nelson, 310 Mo. 527 , 275 S. W. 927 ; Treas. of Jefferson County v. Shannon, 51 Pa. 221 ; Gamble v. Clark (Ga.) 19 S. E. 54 ; Board of Co. Com’rs v. Sims (Colo.) 74 P. 457 .

Shoemaker v. Estate of Freeman

69 O.B.A.J. 850 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1998

.” ¶ 3 Charles Brown died on December 15, 1934, and Raymond Brown died in 1954. Freeman died in 1984. … Pine Island RV Resort, Inc. v.

Board of Education of Dependent School District No. 23 Osage County v. Allen

615 P.2d 1009 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 7, 1980

In Hoffman v. … In Halgren v.

Union Tp. v. Oakdale Tp.

30 Okla. 708 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1912

That on January 4,1904, the board of county commissioners of Washita county divided Union township, creating the south half thereof into Oakdale township. … The defendant in error on this proposition relies mainly on the doctrine announced by the Supreme Court of Indiana in Towle, Trustee, v. Brown, Auditor, 110 Ind. 65, 599 , 10 N. E. 626, 628 .

Board of Trustees of Police Pension & Retirement System of Oklahoma City v. Mitchell

261 P.2d 593 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1953

This is an appeal by the Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System of Oklahoma City from an order and judgment of the district court reversing the finding of said Board of Trustees and directing a judgment … A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that no appeal lies from the action of the district court in reviewing the order made by the Board. The motion to dismiss must be sustained.

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 12 v. STATE

565 P.3d 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 2024

Board of Education of City of Oklahoma City v. … Brown , 2004 OK 7, ¶10 , 85 P.3d 841, 845-46 (words in a statute are to be construed according to their plain and ordinary meaning unless it is clear the legislature intended a different meaning). 42 Okla. Const. Art.

Oklahoma v. INTERN. ASS'N OF FIRE FIGHTERS

254 P.3d 678 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 2011

Brown v. Marker, 1965 OK 172, ¶ 19 , 410 P.2d 61, 66 ; State ex rel. Murphy v. Boudreau, 1982 OK 117, ¶ 12 , 653 P.2d 531, 533 . … City of Hugo v. State ex rel. Public Employees Relations Bd., 1994 OK 134, ¶ 15 , 886 P.2d 485, 492 . That reasoning applies to an interest arbitration board as well.

Jones v. Winters

369 P.2d 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1961

See Jones v. Freeman et al., 193 Okl. 554 , 146 P.2d 564 ; Jones v. Cordell, Secy. et al., 197 Okl. 61 , 168 P.2d 130 ; and Romang v. Cordell, 206 Okl. 369 , 243 P.2d 677 . In Jones v. … Under the authority of Jones v. Freeman and Romang v.

School Dist. No. 25 v. Hodge

199 Okla. 81 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1947

Murphy, State Labor Com’r, et al., 186 Okla. 714 , 100 P.2d 453 ; Brown v. State Election Board et al. (Foley, Intervener), 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 . … In Excise Board of Washita County v.

Bd. of Com'rs, Adair Cty. v. Morris Disinfecting Co.

148 Okla. 127 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1931

The board of county commissioners is designated purchasing agent of the county by statute. Section 5793, C. O. S. 1921. It alone is authorized to enter into contracts for and in behalf of the county. Tulsa County v. … Tulsa Camera Record Co., 103 Okla. 35 , 228 Pac. 1103 ; Edelman v. Bd. of Com’rs of LeFlore County, 110 Okla. 172 , 257 Pac. 94 ; News-Dispatch Ptg. Co. v. LeFlore County, 112 Okla. 138 , 240 Pac. 64 .

Leflore County Ex. Bd. v. St. L.-S. F. Ry.

185 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

of Stephens County v. … It is contended that the judgments were taken under the rules of law announced in the case of Smartt v.

Allen v. State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Uniform Retirement System for Justices & Judges

769 P.2d 1302 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1988

See Hart v. Bridges, Okl., 591 P.2d 1172, 1174 [1979]. 32 . This equity principle is well established in our jurisprudence. See Wagoner County Election Board v. Plunkett, Okl., 305 P.2d 525, 531 [1956] and Parker v. … See Rasure v. Sparks, Okl., 75 Okl. 181 , 183 P. 495, 498 [1919] and Pan American Petro. Corp. v. Board of Tax-Roll Cor., Okl., 510 P.2d 680, 681 [1973].

City of Tulsa v. State Industrial Commission

189 Okla. 73 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1941

City of Duncan v. Ray, 164 Okla. 205 , 23 P. 2d 694 ; Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. 2d 141 ; Spivey & McGill v. Nixon, 163 Okla. 278 , 21 P. 2d 1049 ; Hardy Sanitarium v. … Hardy Sanitarium v. De Hart, supra. In the case of Klein v.

Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Tulsa v. Tulsa Camera Record

103 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1924

Perry Water & Ice Co. v. City of Perry, 29 Okla. 503 , 120 Pac. 582 ; Heed v. Marion County, 21 Kan. 419 ; Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 Pac. 592 ; Covington v. … Rep. 128; Smith v. Board of County Commissioners, Kay County, 47 Okla. 184 , 148 Pac. 111 ; News Dispatch Ptg. Co. & Auditing Co. v. Board of County Commissioners, 61 Okla. 259 , 166 Pac. 207 ; Worrell Mfg. Co. v.

Oil Capitol Sheet Metal Works v. Robinson

447 P.2d 438 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1968

In Fox v. … Brown, 176 Okl. 201 , 55 P.(2d) 129, 130, we held that: ‘In cases where multiple injuries are presented to the State Industrial Commission and that administrative board upon a consideration of the matter awards compensation

State Ex Rel. Brennan v. Shelton

27 Okla. 322 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1910

Laws Okla. 1909, relating to the time of filing nominating petitions, provides: “* * * * Nominating petitions required by this act to be filed with the secretary of the county election board shall be filed not more than ninety … election unless the nominating petition was filed not less than thirty days before the day fixed by law for the primary election where the petition was one required to be filed with the secretary of the county election board

Isaacs v. Oklahoma City

437 P.2d 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 27, 1966

V. Garret. … See Rush v. Brown, 187 Okl. 97 , 101 P.2d 262 , and also in the case of Harris v. State, ex rel.