Case law

Board of Com'rs of Okla. v. De Armond, Stenographer

55 Okla. 622 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1916

We have held in Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v.

Gardner v. School Dist. No. 87, Kay County

34 Okla. 716 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1912

Co. v. … Bank of Mobile, 33 Ala. 693 ; Brown v. County Commissioners, 21 Pa. 37 ; Ottawa v. La Salle, 11 Ill. 654 ; Fosdick v. Perrysburg, 14 Ohio St. 472 ; Black v. Scott, 2 Brock. 325 [Fed. Cas.

In Re the 2005 Tax Assessment of Real Property Owned by BMI Construction Co.

187 P.3d 196 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 2008

Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, ¶ 5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . See also Kluver v. Weatherford Hosp. … Samman v.

Board of Com'rs v. George D. Barnard Stationery Co.

171 Okla. 274 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1935

Board of County Commissioners of Delaware County v. News Dispatch Printing & Audit Co., 122 Okla. 107 , 251 P. 606 . … Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. News Dispatch Printing & Audit Co., 104 Okla. 260 , 231 P. 250 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Co-operative Publishing Co., 104 Okla. 262 , 231 P. 251 .

Appeal of Moreland

497 P.2d 1287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1972

Harris et al. (1941), 191 Okl. 125 , 126 P.2d 988 ; Thompson v. Phillips Petroleum Company (1944), 194 Okl. 77 , 147 P.2d 451 ; Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa v. … Shore (1952), 207 Okl. 381 , 249 P.2d 1011 ; Appeal of Pierce (1959), Okl., 347 P.2d 790 ; Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City et al. v. Puckett (1960), Okl., 353 P.2d 4 ; Brown v. Fraser (1970), Okl., 467 P.2d 464 .

Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Lincoln County Excise Board

192 Okla. 683 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1943

It concedes that under our decision in State v. … It points to certain language in the case of State v. Board of Commissioners of LeFlore County, above, to sustain its contention.

Hall Lithographing v. Bd. of Comrs. of Roger Mills

8 Okla. 378 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

In the case of Hoffman v. … In the case of Sauer v.

Beveridge v. Harper & Turner Oil Trust

168 Okla. 609 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1934

R. 1016; Jahn of al. v. Board of Public Works et al., 274 U. S. 325 , 47 Sup. Ct. Rep. 594, 71 D. Ed. 1074). … In re Dawson, supra; Zahn et al. v. Board of Public Works of the City of Los Angles et al. (Cal.) 234 P. 388 ; Brown v. City of Los Angeles et al. (Cal.) 192 P. 716 .

Walker v. Oak Cliff Volunteer Fire Protection District

807 P.2d 762 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1990

Fuller v. Odom, see note 9, at 452; Anschutz Corp. v. Sanders, 734 P.2d 1290, 1292 (Okla.1987). . Wade v. Brown, 516 P.2d 526, 528 (Okla.1973); In re Guardianship of Campbell, 450 P.2d 203, 205 (Okla.1966). . Cook v. … Waltner, 340 Mo. 137 , 100 S.W.2d 272, 275 (1936); Ewing v. Harries, 68 Utah 452 , 250 P. 1049, 1050 (1926); Brown v. Randolph County Court, 45 W.Va. 827 , 32 S.E. 165, 167 (1899). . See, State ex rel. Cameron v.

Sheridan Oil Co. v. Superior Court of Creek County

183 Okla. 372 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1938

Board of Com’rs of Creek County v. Alexander, 58 Okla. 128 , 159 P. 311 ; Grayson v. Thompson, 77 Okla. 77 , 186 P. 236 ; Wagner v. Swan, 162 Okla. 95 , 19 P.2d 555 ; Bryan & Son v. … Vernor, 172 Okla. 382 , 45 P.2d 468 ; Childers v. Paul, 177 Okla. 111 , 57 P.2d 872 . The purpose intended to be accomplished by the act also claims a degree of consideration (Brown v.

Heldermon v. Wright

152 P.3d 855 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 2006

by the Board upon request." 2 . … We discussed the relationship between statutory enactments and the common law in Brown v. Ford, 1995 OK 101, ¶ 10 , 905 P.2d 223, 228-229 .

Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff's Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge Number 188 v. Board of County Commissioners

69 O.B.A.J. 2025 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1998

Duncan v. City of Nichols Hills, 913 P-2d 1303, 1310 (Okla.1996). However, this rule applies only when the special statute “clearly includes the matter in controversy.” Carter v. … In Board of County Commissioners v.

National Surety Co. v. Com'rs Cherokee County

79 Okla. 158 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1920

The board of county commissioners dis-, allowed said claim and .from said order the surety company appealed to the district court of Cherokee county, where a *159 jury was waived and the case was tried to the court upon an … The plaintiff in error contends that when the county commissioners approved the bond they had no authority to cancel the approval, and relies upon the case of National Surety Co. v.

McAlister v. State Ex Rel. Short

95 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1923

McAlister, secretary of the State Election Board, Claude Baker, chairman of said election board, John P. Logan, member of the State Election Board, R. A. … Fitnam v. Galesburg, 48 Ill. 485 ; Walton et al. v. Develing et al., 61 Ill. 201 ; Darst et al. v. People, 62 Ill. 306 ; Harris et al. v. Shryock et al., 82 Ill. 119 .

Todd v. Orr

44 Okla. 459 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

Tatum, 21 Ark. 329 ; Ivanhoe Furnace Corporation v. Crowder's Adm’r, 110 Va. 387 , 66 S. E. 63 ; Gallegos v. Sandoval, 15 N. M. 216, 106 Pac. 373 ; Schmidt v. Brown, 80 Hun. 183 , 30 N. Y. Supp. 68 ; Hawkins v. … The same right was recognized in the following additional cases: Brown et al. v. Capital Townsite Co., 21 Okla. 586 , 96 Pac. 587 ; Badger Lbr. Co. v. Rhoades, 26 Okla. 261 , 109 Pac. 302 ; Riely v.

Lankford, State Bank Com'r v. Schroeder

47 Okla. 279 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1915

The case of Lankford et al., Composing the State Banking Board, v. Platte Iron Works Co., 235 U. S. 461 , 35 Sup. Ct. 173, 59 L. … See State Banking Board of Oklahoma et al. v. Farish, 235 U. S. 498 , 35 Sup. Ct. 185, 59 L. Ed. 330 .

Commonwealth Oil & Gas Co. v. State Board of Equalization

170 Okla. 519 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1935

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization et al., cause No. 24271, this day decided ( 170 Okla. 517 , 41 P. [2d] 453 ), having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.

Stephens v. Borgman

202 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1949

Dept. of Labor, v. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. (3 Cir.) 124 Fed. 2d 567; State Bar of Oklahoma v. Retail Credit Ass’n et al., 170 Okla. 246 , 37 P. 2d 954 , and Curtis v. … In the case of U.S. v. Martin, 94 U.S. 400 -404, 24 L.

Nordman v. School District No. 43

190 Okla. 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1941

Berry Dry Goods Co. v. Ward, 120 Okla. 11 , 249 P. 916 ; Tiger v. Brown, 130 Okla. 83 , 265 P. 124 ; Sommers v. Heiny, 132 Okla. 237 , 270 P. 28 ; Hartzell v. Choctaw Lbr. Co., 163 Okla. 240 , 22 P. 2d 387 ; Raymer v. … Co. v. Ind.

Crist v. Henshaw

196 Okla. 168 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1945

Workers v. National Mediation Board, 110 F. 2d 529 ; Teague v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, 127 F. 2d 53 , and other similar cases. … Bouchey, 13 N.Y.S. 2d 208 ; Diggs et al. v. Morgan College, 133 Md. 264 , 105 Atl. 157 ; Schoolhause et al. v. Browning et al., 190 N.Y.S. 353 . Also, see, Allen v. Oklahoma City et al., 175 Okla. 421 , 52 P. 2d 1054 .