Case law

Kiddie v. Kiddie

563 P.2d 139 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1977

Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 202 Okl. 108 , 210 P.2d 666 (1949) held a party appearing in a dentistry licensing hearing is entitled to employ counsel but not to be furnished counsel. Also see Brown v. … Boddie v.

Herrin v. Arnold

183 Okla. 392 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1938

Justice Brown, who concurred in the result, did not think the act unconstitutional on the ground now being considered. … See Board of Barter Examiners v. Parker (La.) 182 So. 485 .

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Fortinberry Co.

201 Okla. 537 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1949

Levin v. Hunt, 70 Okla. 63 , 172 P. 940 ; Storm, Adm’r, et al. v. Gar-nett et al., 99 Okla. 284 , 227 P. 417 ; Haynes v. Brown, 18 Okla. 389 , 89 P. 1124 . It was the duty of the Tax Commission to approve the claim. … Co. v. Lein-inger, supra; Board of Com’rs of Seminole County v. State ex rel. Cobb, County Judge, 31 Okla. 196 , 120 P. 913 . Judgment affirmed. ARNOLD, V. C.

Protest of Sweeney

183 Okla. 211 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1938

In the case of Hammels v. Kreig, 240 P. 348 , the Supreme Court of Arizona states as follows: "In Daggs v. … United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Ham, 122 Okla. 261 , 254 P. 100 ; Cannon v. Cannon, 170 Okla. 366 , 40 P.2d 649 . The principle of the rule is applicable here. The motion had no effect.

Fitzpatrick v. McAlister

121 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1926

Trapp’s name to the State Board of Affairs, and to enjoin the State Board of Affairs from having Mr. … Robertson v. State Election Board and M. E.

Dominic v. Davis

262 P.2d 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1953

In Martin v. … Kimberlin v. Board of County Com’rs, 78 Okl. 143 , 189 P. 361 ; Goar v. Brown, 82 Okl; 227, 200 P. 156 ; Dunagan v. [Town of] Red Rock, 58 Okl. 218 , 158 P. 1170 ; Cobb v. Berry, 67 Okl. 29 , 168 P. 46 .

Feuquay v. McAlister

102 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1924

Beginning in 1899 with Huddleston v. … Stearns v. Sims, 24 Okla. 623 , 104 Pac. 44 ; State ex rel. Shepard v. Crouch, 31 Okla. 206 , 120 Pac. 915 ; McKee v. Election Board, 36 Okla. 258 . 128 Pac. 294 ; Strother v.

Palmer v. Harris

23 Okla. 500 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1909

The respondent, Meeker, appealed from the action of the county board removing him, and made application to said board to allow him a supersedeas, and presented to the board a bond in the sum of $1,000 for its approval, which … Some of said cases are as follows: Mayor v. Shaw, 14 Ga. 162 ; Allen v. Robinson, 17 Minn. 113 ( Gil. 90 ); Fylpaa v. Brown County, 6 S. D. 634, 62 N. W. 962 ; Honey v. Davis et al., 38 Tex. 63 ; Craig v.

Shepherd v. Hood

185 Okla. 635 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1939

See Skelly Oil Co. v. Ellis (1936) 176 Okla. 569 , 56 P.2d 891 ; Harris Meat & Produce Co. v. Brown (1936) 177 Okla. 317 , 59 P.2d 280 ; Sheffield Steel Corp. v. Barton (1938) 183 Okla. 624 , 84 P.2d 17 . 2. … Heinz Co. v.

Billington v. Grayson

59 Okla. 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1916

Stallard et al. v. Knapp, 0 Okla. 591 , 60 Pac. 234 ; Oligschlager v. Grell, 13 Okla. 632 , 75 Pac. 1131 ; Montemat v. Johnson, 42 Okla. 443 , 141 Pac. 779 ; Board of Commissioners of Creek County v. State ex rel. … Berry, 3 Okla. 617 , 41 Pac. 580 ; Brown on Jurisdiction, sec. 10. This cause should be affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

Wallace v. Duke

44 Okla. 124 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1914

Such is the situation in the following cases: The case of Barton v. … Brown, 11 Okla. 118 , 65 Pac. 925 , the suit was on a promissory note; in F. F. Co. v. Vaughn, 18 Okla. 14 , the suit was for money had and received; in Brooks v.

Cotteral v. Barker

34 Okla. 533 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1912

This question was considered by the court in the case of Mitchell v. … The case of Board of Education of the City of Ardmore et al. v. State ex rel.

Johnson v. City of Woodward

38 P.3d 218 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 2001

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22, n. 30 , 989 P.2d 448, 456, n. 30 . … See Northwest Datsun v.

Philadelphia Fire & Marine Ins. v. Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. No. 11

131 Okla. 39 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1928

In Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance Co. v. … Hillock v. Traders Ins. Co. (Mich.) 20 N. W. 571 ; Miller v. Fireman’s Ins. Co., etc. (W. Va.) 46 S. E. 181 . The plaintiff school district cites the case of Chamberlin v.

Otjen v. Kerr

191 Okla. 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1942

S. 1921) and, “Upon the filing of such a petition, it shall be the duty of such board, if a recount is prayed for, to *642 inspect and count the ballots questioned.” (Sec. 6, ch. 241, Laws 1929.) “In Brown v. … The Logan v. Young and Brown v. Branson Cases, supra, bear out my view on this material distinction.

Shawnee Gas & Electric Co. v. Griffith

96 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1923

Co. v. Wooley Fdy., etc., Works, 26 Ind. App. 7 , 58 N. E. 1069 ; Dole v. Johnson, 50 N. H. 452; Jones v. Tucker, 41 N. H. 546; Wright v. Williams, 47 Vt. 222 , 46 Atl. 1073 . … Corp. v. Melovich, 202 Fed. 438 ; Kershaw v. Wright, 115 Mass. 361 ; N. Y., etc., Railroad Co. v. Wilson, 109 Va. 754 ; Vander-Donckt v. Thellussoh, 8 C. B. (Eng.) 812.

IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF ARNETT

2022 OK 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 2022

While driving home that night, Arnett struck Christopher Brown (Brown)--a pedestrian in the roadway--with her vehicle. Emergency Medical Technicians transported Brown to the hospital, where he died several hours later. … Bar Ass'n v. Brown, 2013 OK 40 303 P.3d 895 ¶3 I find that Ms.

Welker v. Annett Bd. of Com'rs Pawnee Cty.

44 Okla. 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

Laws 1910), and the rules and regulations of the State Board of Agriculture authorized by these statutes, it was the duty of the defendant county to erect said vat and to have erected said omitted pen, to "dip” the said cattle … See 11 Cyc. 497-500; Board of County Commissioners of Greer County v. Watson, 7 Okla. 174 , 54 Pac. 441 ; Howard v. Rose Twp. of Payne County et al., 37 Okla. 153 , 131 Pac. 683 .

Hannan v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Lawton

25 Okla. 372 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1909

People ex rel. v. Kent, 160 Ill. 655 , 43 N. E. 760 ; Boseker et al. v. Board of Com'rs of Wabash County, 88 Ind. 267 ; Hoole v. Kinkead et al., 16 Nev. 217 . Or, as is said in the case of Commonwealth ex rel. … Snyder et al. v.

Jack v. State

183 Okla. 375 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1937

Whiteneck v. Board of County Commissioners (1923) 89 Okla. 52 , 213 P. 865 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Hancock (1925 ) 96 Okla. 238 , 221 P. 429 . … Oklahoma City v. Shields, supra; State v. Brown (1909) 24 Okla. 433 , 103 P. 762 ; Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & Tyner (1911) 28 Okla. 275 . 114 P. 333 ; Hatfield v. Garnett (1915) 45 Okla. 438 , 146 P. 24 .