Case law

Muskogee Times-Democrat v. Com'rs of Muskogee County

76 Okla. 188 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1919

Laws 1910, and was so held by this court in the ease of Stillwater Advance Printing and Publishing Company v. Board of County Commissioners of Payne County, 29 Okla. 859 , 119 Pac. 1002 . … When the court in the case of Stillwater Advance Printing & Publishing Company v. Board of County Commisioners of Payne County, 29 Okla. 859 . 119 Pac. 1002 , adopted •the theory that this portion of section 6021, Rev.

Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee County v. Campbell

131 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1928

In the case of Swarts v. State ex rel. … In the case of Kingfisher County v.

Ray v. Masters

429 P.2d 991 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1967

Jur. § 227, pg. 181, and Antrim Lumber Co. v. Oklahoma State Bank, 65 Okl. 25 , 162 P. 723 , L.R.A.1918A, 528. … Berland’s, Inc. of Tulsa v. Northside Village Shopping Center, Inc., Okl., 378 P.2d 860 , and State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Cities Service Oil Co., Okl., 317 P.2d 722 .

Butterly v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin County

157 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1932

This case presents substantially the same question as decided this day, by this court, in the case of Hoover et al. v. … The case of Carson v. Oklahoma Dredging Co., 152 Okla. 147 , 4 P. (2d) 71 , is decisive and controlling on the questions herein involved. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

City of Oklahoma City v. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 157

254 P.3d 678 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 2011

Brown v. Marker, 1965 OK 172, 119 , 410 P.2d 61, 66 ; State ex rel. Murphy v. Boudreau, 1982 OK 117, ¶ 12 , 653 P.2d 531, 533 . … City of Hugo v. State ex rel. Public Employees Relations Bd., 1994 OK 134, ¶ 15 , 886 P.2d 485, 492 . That reasoning applies to an interest arbitration board as well.

Smith v. Board of Com'rs of Washita County

38 Okla. 436 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1913

In Polk v. Minnehaha County, 5 Dak. 120 , 37 N. … Hinds v. Marmolejo, 60 Cal. 229, 231 ; Daggs v. Phoenix Nat. Bank, 5 Ariz. 409 , 53 Pac. 201, 204 ; Wolverton v. Exchange Nat. Bank, 11 Wash. 94 , 39 Pac. 247 . In Guild v. First Nat. Bank, 4 S. D. 566, 57 N.

Childs v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

70 O.B.A.J. 2233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1999

(the Board). … Bowlin v. Alley, 1989 OK 66 , 773 P.2d 365, 368 (citing Tigner v. Texas, 310 U.S. 141, 147 , 60 S.Ct. 879, 882 , 84 L.Ed. 1124, 1128 (1940)); Brown v. Lillard, 1991 OK 74 , 814 P.2d 1040, 1041 (citing Kirk v. Bd.

State Ex Rel. Settles v. Board of Education of Dependent School District No. D-38

389 P.2d 356 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1964

Co. of Cincinnati, Ohio v. State Ins. Board, 184 Okl. 66 , 84 P.2d 614 ), justice will not permit us to ignore such interpretations to the detriment of those who may have relied thereon. … Board of Education of City of Guthrie v. Excise Board, 86 Okl. 24 , 206 P. 517 . In the sixth paragraph of the syllabus in State ex rel. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. v.

Burba v. State Industrial Commission

195 Okla. 344 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1944

Hollis v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp., 174 Okla. 544 , 51 P. 2d 498 ; Cook v. State Industrial Commission, 186 Okla. 157 , 96 P. 2d 1038 ; Brown v. … Board of County Commissioners, 188 Okla. 52 , 105 P. 2d 1068 ; and Zimmerman v. Sanders Const. Co., 188 Okla. 361 , 109 P. 2d 486 .

Spartan Aircraft Company v. Merchant

274 P.2d 1018 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1954

LeFlore-Poteau Coal Co. v. Thurston, 184 Okl. 178 , 86 P.2d 284 ; Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. Stevens, 194 Okl. 109 , 148 P.2d 176 ; Gentry v. State Industrial Commission, 202 Okl. 75 , 210 P.2d 160 ; M. & W. … Mining Co. v. Lee, 199 Okl. 76 , 182 P.2d 759 ; Oklahoma Furniture Mfg. Co. v. Washington, 180 Okl. 381 , 70 P.2d 69 . Award sustained. JOHNSON, V. C. J„ and WELCH, CORN, ARNOLD, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.

Bare v. Patterson

200 Okla. 420 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1948

It must be, and is, conceded that ordinarily mandamus will not lie to correct errors of judgment by a board in matters over which the board has jurisdiction. … If the filing was contrary to law by reason of the failure to support the notification and declaration by the required affidavits, accepted for filing by the secretary of the board, then the action of the board must not be

Carter v. Sapulpa & I. Ry. Co.

49 Okla. 471 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1915

In Walker et al. v. Brown, Adm’x, 165 U. S. 654 , 17 Sup. Ct. 453, 41 L. Ed. 865 , Mr. … In Ketchum et al. v. St. Louis, 101 U. S. 306 , 25 L.

State Ex Rel. Murphy v. Board of Com'rs

185 Okla. 652 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

WELCH, V. C. J. … We conclude, however, that the case is controlled by the recent case of the Board of Education of Oklahoma City of Cloudman, 185 Okla. 400 . 92 P.2d 837 . decided since the filing of the briefs herein.

HCA Health Services of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Whetsel

173 P.3d 1203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 2007

State v. One Thousand Two Hundred Sixty-Seven Dollars, 2006 OK 15, ¶ 25 , 131 P.3d 116, 125 . See also Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, ¶ 5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . … Department of Human Services v.

Board of Com's of Greer County v. Tittle

31 Okla. 354 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

The questions involved in this proceeding are: (1) Is the county liable for sheriff’s fees in misdemeanor cases; and (2) had the board of county commissioners authority to cause such fees to be paid out of the county funds … Jefferson v. Winkler, 26 Okla. 653 , 110 Pac. 755 ; *356 2 Lewis, Sutherland, Statutory Construction (2d Ed.) vol. 1, sec. 352.

Hickman v. Board of Com'rs of Pottawatomie County

169 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1934

In the syllabus to Hawks et al. v. … Wentz et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County, Okla., 147 Okla. 173 , 295 P. 599 ; Wentz et al. v. Ingenthron et al., 146 Okla. 165 , 294 P. 154 ; Wentz et al. v. Dawson, 149 Okla. 94 , 299 P. 493 .

Board of Com'rs of Creek Co. v. Bartlett

77 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1920

It was held by this court in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County et al. v. Fink et al., 60 Okla. 67 , 159 Pac. 470 (affirmed, 248 U. S. 399 , 63 L. … Kansas Indians (Blue Jacket v. Johnsons County) 5 Wall. 737 , 18 L. Ed. 667 ; United States v. Rickert, 188 U. S. 432 , 47 L. Ed. 532 , 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 478, cases cited in Choate v. Trapp.

Board of Com'rs of Stephens County v. Graham

190 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1941

Board of Com’rs of Rogers County v. Baxter, 113 Okla. 280 , 241 P. 752 ; see, also, Morse v. Board of Com’rs of Marshall County, 169 Okla. 600 , 38 P. 2d 945 . … Board of Com’rs of Garfield County v. Anderson, 167 Okla. 253 , 29 P. 2d 75 .

Board of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Tractor & Equipment Co.

183 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1938

Board of County Com’rs of Le Flore County v. Central Nat. Bank of Potean, 177 Okla. 11 , 57 P.2d 257 ; Excise Board of Creek County v. Gulf Pipe Line Co., 156 Okla. 103 , 9 P.2d 460 . … County v.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LOWERY

2023 OK 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 2023

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Bar Ass'n v. Brown , , 773 P.2d 781 , in addition to converting client funds, an attorney was found to be dishonest during a deposition taken for the purpose of investigating the disciplinary matter.