Case law

Gillespie v. Board of Com'rs of Payne County

192 Okla. 202 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1942

Gillespie filed an action in the district court of Payne county, naming board of county commissioners of Payne county and J. M. … The plaintiff in error has filed an application wherein he states that the issues in this case are identical with the issues in case No. 30654, Anna Hogrefe v.

State ex rel. Robinett v. Jarrett

200 Okla. 387 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1948

City Council of City of McAlester v. Milwee, 31 Okla. 620 , 122 P. 173 , 40 L.R.A., N.S., 576; State ex rel. Cameron v. Jones, 165 Okla. 193 , 25 P. 2d 648 . … She would have had the same remedy had the Board stricken her name as a candidate. Love v. State Election Board, 197 Okla. 157 , 170 P. 2d 193 ; Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 ; Love v.

Weathers v. Board of Com'rs of Coal County

54 Okla. 723 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 1916

Haskins & Sells v. Oklahoma City, 36 Okla. 57 , 126 Pac. 204 ; In re Application of State to Issue Bonds to Fund Indebtedness, 33 Okla. 797 , 127 Pac. 1065 ; Faulk v. … Board of Com’rs of Marshall County, 40 Okla. 705 , 140 Pac. 777 . Third.

Spurrier v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County

180 Okla. 644 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1937

But such was not the case, and therefore the facts bring the controversy within the rule of Anadarko Funeral Home v. Scarth, 173 Okla. 103 , 46 P. (2d) 539 , Board of County Commissioners of Okmulgee County v. … Alexander, 171 Okla. 288 , 42 P. (2d) 884 , Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v.

Board of Com's of Greer County v. Tittle

31 Okla. 354 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1912

The questions involved in this proceeding are: (1) Is the county liable for sheriff’s fees in misdemeanor cases; and (2) had the board of county commissioners authority to cause such fees to be paid out of the county funds … Jefferson v. Winkler, 26 Okla. 653 , 110 Pac. 755 ; *356 2 Lewis, Sutherland, Statutory Construction (2d Ed.) vol. 1, sec. 352.

Board of Com'rs of Creek Co. v. Bartlett

77 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1920

It was held by this court in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County et al. v. Fink et al., 60 Okla. 67 , 159 Pac. 470 (affirmed, 248 U. S. 399 , 63 L. … Kansas Indians (Blue Jacket v. Johnsons County) 5 Wall. 737 , 18 L. Ed. 667 ; United States v. Rickert, 188 U. S. 432 , 47 L. Ed. 532 , 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 478, cases cited in Choate v. Trapp.

Carter County Excise Board v. Stanolind Pipe Line

191 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1942

Julian Oil & Royalty Co. v. Capshaw, 145 Okla. 237 , 292 P. 841 ; Oklahoma Light & Power Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, 96 Okla. 19 , 220 P. 54 . See, also, National Mutual Casualty Co. v. … Morley et al. v. State ex rel. Bd. of Ed. of City of Tulsa, 171 Okla. 46 , 47 P. 2d 170 ; St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Choctaw County Excise Board, 173 Okla. 312 , 48 P. 2d 312 . No showing in that regard is herein made.

Thompson v. Huston

170 Okla. 195 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1935

See Pottawatomie County et al. v. Alexander, Co. Assessor, 68 Okla. 110 , 2 P. (2d) 955 , and Rumsey v. Board of Com’rs of Comanche County, 151 Okla. 110 , 2 P. (2d) 995 , and Rumsey v. … Treas., v. Blaine, 149 Okla. 153 , 300 P. 369 . See Brown v. Woods et al., 2 Okla. 601 , 39 P. 473 ; Trustees, etc., et al. v. Hooton, Co. Clerk, 53 Okla. 530 , 157 P. 293 ; Board of Com’rs of Creek County et al. v.

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Board of Equalization

169 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1934

On the 4th day of September, 1934, the defendant in error filed a confession of error on behalf of the board of equalization of Beckham county, Okla., stating in substance that this court, in cause No. 23874, Grieves v.

Doyle v. Board of Com'rs of Leflore Co.

103 Okla. 171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

of Agriculture *172 of the State of Oklahoma, the exercise of authority to make such appointments being assented to by the board of county commissioners, and said board of commissioners issued warrants in payment of the … became and was an officer of that county, and, therefore, the case is within the rule laid down by this court in Smart, Sheriff, v.

Smith v. PIONEER MASONRY, INC.

226 P.3d 687 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 2009

Shephard v. CompSource Oklahoma, 2009 OK 25, ¶ 11 , 209 P.3d 288, 292-93 . ¶ 6 On the issue of public policy, Brown is also inconsistent with the teachings of Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , 833 P.2d 1218 . … Indiana Nat'l Bank v. State Dept. of Human Services, 1994 OK 98 , 880 P.2d 371 . [1] 1995 OK 101 , 905 P.2d 223 . In Brown v.

Board of Com'rs of Bryan County v. Wilkerson

182 Okla. 523 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1938

Nickel v. Janda, 115 Okla. 207 , 242 P. 264 . … Secundum, Appeal and Error, 402; Hirabelli v. Daniels (Utah) 138 P. 1172 ; Boyd v. Schott (Ind.) 52 N. E. 752 .

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Board of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters v. Parrish

152 P.3d 202 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 2006

The Board bears "the burden of persuasion on the material elements of the Complaint." Id. at Rule 7(b). It must do so by "clear and convincing evidence." State of Okla. ex rel. State Bd. of Official Shorthand Reps. v. … Oklahoma Bar Association v. Garrett, 2005 OK 91 , 127 P.3d 600 .

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Cline

42 Okla. 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1914

See Wallingford v. Wood et al., 41 Okla. 572 , 139 Pac. 252 ; Howard Mercantile Co. et al. v. Squires, County Judge, et al., 41 Okla. 580 , 139 Pac. 253 ; Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City, M. & O.

Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc County v. Witherspoon

189 Okla. 277 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 1941

Trudgeon v. Board of County Commissioners of McClain Co., 180 Okla. 83 , 68 P. 2d 82 ; Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Colored Hospital Ass’n, 181 Okla. 357 , 73 P. 2d 833 . … condemned and held illegal in Board of County Com’rs of Pontotoc County v.

Board of Com'rs of Grady Co. v. Castleman

66 Okla. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1917

See Burrows v. Balfour, 39 Ore. 488 , 65 Pac. 1062 , where it is held that the word “fee” includes_mil-eage and per diem, to which a witness is entitled. The judgment of the lower court is therefore reversed.

Board of Com'rs of Custer County v. Lawter

58 Okla. 310 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1916

That the defendants are the board of county commissioners of Custer county; that Custer county has a population of not exceeding fifty thousand, and the salary fixed by the *311 general fee and salary law, as compensation … The question, whether the act creating the superior court for Custer county is special legislation, was decided adversely to the contention of counsel in Leatherock et al., v.

HCA Health Services of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Whetsel

173 P.3d 1203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 2007

State v. One Thousand Two Hundred Sixty-Seven Dollars, 2006 OK 15, ¶ 25 , 131 P.3d 116, 125 . See also Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, ¶ 5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . … Department of Human Services v.

Tulsa County Board of Equalization v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County

743 P.2d 1076 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1987

See also Board of County Commissioners of Canadian County v. State Board of Equalization, 363 P.2d 242, 246 (Okl.1961); Continental Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 570 P.2d 315 (Okl.1977). … The Board relies on Sioux City Bridge Co. v.

Hemmingway v. Board of Ed., City of Devol

108 Okla. 276 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1925

Upon the authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469 , 106 Pac. 957 , this cause is reversed and remanded for new trial for failure of the defendant in error to file brief as provided in rule 7 of this court.