Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

3.03s

  • Wilson v. Board of Com'rs of Mayes County

    112 Okla. 149 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1925

    Brown, county judge of Mayes county, appointed the appellant, Martha J. Wilson, as county court stenographer and ex-officio deputy court clerk. The said Martha J. … In the case of Thomas v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Elliott v. Trisler

    66 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1917

    Trisler testified that Axie Brown dedicated the road in 1907, but he does not testify as to what she did that constituted a dedication of this road. … Board of Commissioners of Woodward County v. Thyfault, 43 Okla. 82 , 141 Pac. 409 ; White et al. v. Dowell, 49 Okla. 589 , 153 Pac. 1140 ; Britton v. Morris, 59 Okla. 162 , 158 Pac. 358 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Walter Realty Co. v. Jones

    35 Okla. 272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1913

    Rathbone v. Sterling, 25 Kan. 444 . The case of King v. … In'support of this proposition Rathbone v. Sterling, 25 Kan. 444, Brown v. Parker, 2 Okla. 258 , 39 Pac. 567 , and Biddick v. Kobler, 110 Cal. 191 , 42 Pac. 578 , are cited.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Equalization of Tulsa County v. Kennedy

    189 Okla. 154 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1941

    of the board of equalization. … State v. Boyett, 183 Okla. 49 , 80 P. 2d 201 ; State v. Board of Com’rs of Creek County, 188 Okla. 184 , 107 P. 2d 542 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Earnest v. School Board of Independent District No. 16 of Stillwater

    666 P.2d 1287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1983

    Oldham v. Drummond, Bd. of Educ., Okl., 542 P.2d 1309 (1975). I further note that other than a five day limit, the negotiated agreement has very little in common with the state law which governs it.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carter Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization

    170 Okla. 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1935

    Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization et al, cause No. 24271, this day decided ( 170 Okla. 517 , 41 P. [2d] 453 ), having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jefferson County Excise Board

    182 Okla. 458 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1938

    Grable v. Childers, State Auditor, 176 Okla. 360 , 56 P.2d 357 . The unmistakable object and intent of the legislation herein considered, and which we have considered in the case of Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. … Tulsa County Excise Board, No. 28356, decided April 5, 1938, (not yet released for publication), is to promote higher efficiency and more nearly uniform educational facilities among the several school districts throughout

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. National Bank of Tulsa

    388 P.2d 497 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1963

    In the case of Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. … The Iowa case of Baker v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Grand River Dam Authority

    720 P.2d 713 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1986

    720 P.2d 713 (1986) WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Appellant, v. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY, Brown Boveri Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Benham-Holway Power Group, Appellees. … In Skouby v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Tonini v. Board of Com'rs of Comanche County

    150 Okla. 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1931

    Tonini against the board of county commissioners of that county to recover money paid for the purchase of a tax sale certificate. For authority to maintain the action, plaintiff relies on section 9739, C. O. … Clark v. Board of Com’rs of Cimarron County, 143 Okla. 18 , 285 Pac. 127 . Fullerton v. State ex rel. Com’rs of Land Office, 140 Okla. 122 , 282 Pac. 674 . Hammond v. State ex rel.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Com'rs of Garvin County v. Trahern

    59 Okla. 222 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1916

    This ease involves the same questions as raised in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Garvin County, Okla., v. Alvin F. Pyeatt, Assignee of T. C. Branum, et al.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rose v. Independent School Board No. 3, Buffalo Valley, Latimer County

    367 P.2d 171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1961

    In support of this argument, they cite the case of Hollarn v. … No. 116 etc. v. Wolf, 78 Kan. 805 , 98 P. 237, 239 , 20 L.R.A.,N.S., 358) ; and we think it is controlling here.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. McWilliams

    92 Okla. 119 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

    Bohart v. Anderson, 24 Okla. 82 , 103 Pac. 742 ; Johnston v. Board of Com’rs of Murray Co., 53 Okla. 093 , 158 Pac. 164 . … Stults v. Board of Commissioners (Ind.) 81 N. E. 471 ; County of Lancaster v. Mishler (Pa.) 45 Am. Rep. 402 ; Clark v. Callaway (Ark.) 12 S. W. 756 ; Cox v. Royal Tribe (Ore.) 71 Pac. 73 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Incorporation of Town of Big Cabin

    132 Okla. 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1928

    Appellants also rely upon the case of Town of Enterprise v. … Kimberlin v. Board of County Com’rs, 78 Okla. 143 , 180 Pac. 361 ; Goar v. Brown, 82 Okla. 227 , 200 Pac. 156 ; Dunagan v. Red Rock, 58 Okla. 218 , 158 Pac. 1170 ; Cobb v. Berry, 67 Okla. 29 , 168 Pac. 46 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Dusbabek v. Board of Com'rs of Blaine County

    188 Okla. 602 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1941

    . § 1143), as well as the cases of Winters v. Birch, 169 Okla. 237 , 36 P. 2d 907 , and Gentry et al. v. McCurry et al., 134 Okla. 182 , 273 P. 222 . … CORN, V. C. J., and OSBORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Com'rs of Delaware County v. Fields

    38 Okla. 744 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1913

    Laws 1910, sec. 3225), provides that, for the purpose of fixing the amount to be 'paid to thé officers provided for the 'boards of county commissioners shall adopt as a basis for .that purpose the number of' inhabitants of … The same question of law is presented in this case that was presented and determined by this court in Board of Bounty Com’rs of Delaware County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dorough v. Board of Com'rs of Carter County

    179 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1937

    We had occasion to construe this section of the statute in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. … We have since held to the contrary in Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Washington County, 171 Okla. 302 , 42 P. (2d) 533 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sherry v. State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs

    140 Okla. 232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

    The action was begun by the board of county commissioners of Tulsa county against Wayne L. … Scott et al. v. Amis et al., 136 Okla. 72 , 276 Pac. 215 , and cases therein cited. Wayne L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Board of Comr's of Seminole County

    192 Okla. 382 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1943

    As held in Gooldy v. … J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., absent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists v. Childs

    203 Okla. 409 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1950

    ARNOLD, V. C. J. By his petition filed herein Dr. … An examination of the record discloses that the question now presented is identical with that presented to and determined by us in the recent case of the Board of Governors, Registered Dentists of Oklahoma, v. C. E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.