Case law

Oklahoma Union Railway Co. v. Hainey

96 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1923

It was alleged *218 the ear was running at approximately 25 miles per hour, and plaintiff was standing at the station of Parenthia for the purpose of boarding a car, and the motorman operating the car waived his hand for … Co. v. Richards, 23 Okla. 256 , 102 Pac. 99 .

Missouri, Kansas & Oklahoma Coach Lines v. Meister

330 P.2d 579 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1958

Brown v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. … In Williams v.

Spiro State Bank v. First Poteau Corporation

70 O.B.A.J. 471 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1999

Supp.1993 § 990.4, Wilks v. Wilks, 1981 OK 91 , 632 P.2d 759, 763 , Brown v. … Let the writ issue directing the Board and the Commissioner to withdraw the January 27 Certifícate of Authority within 5 days of this order’s date. Rule 1.193 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules.

Potter v. Bond

98 Okla. 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1924

L. 28-217, and Richards v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 224 , 154 Pac. 72 . … McNally v. Harley, 68 Okla. 115 , 172 Pac. 46 ; Bishop-Babcock-Baker Company v. Estes Drug Company, 63 Okla. 117 , 163 Pac. 276 ; Fender, Administrator, et al. v.

Humphrey v. Coquillard Wagon Works

37 Okla. 714 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1913

Railway Company v. Rambolt, 67 Tex. 654 , 4 S. W. 356 ; Carroll v. Silk, 70 Tex. 23 , 11 S. W. 116 ; Betterton v. Echols, 85 Tex. 212 , 20 S. W. 63 ; Erwin v. Blanks, 60 Tex. 583 ; Carney v. Marsalis, 77 Tex. 62 , 13 S. … Co. v.

Henry v. Ionic Petroleum Company

391 P.2d 792 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1964

Again, in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. … See Oklahoma City v. State ex rel. Williamson, 185 Okl. 219 , 90 P.2d 1064 . It will be noted that the syllabus quoted supra from the case of Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v.

Tripp v. English

59 Okla. 225 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1916

Board of Commissioners Wyandotte County, 28 Kan. 326 ; Davis, Adrn’r, v. Clark et al., 58 Kan. 454 , 49 Pac. 665 ; Durein v. Pontious, 34 Kan. 353 , 8 Pac. 428 ; State v. Pfefferle, 33 Kan. 718 , 7 Pac. 597 ; Frame v. … Brown v. Jacobs Pharmacy Co. [ 115 Ga. 429 , 41 S. E. 553 . 57 L. R. A. 547] 90 Am. St. Rep. 126 .”

State Ex Rel. King v. McCurdy

171 Okla. 445 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1935

It is contended that this portion of the road was abandoned by the board of county commissioners, but the defendant failed to show any record or official action of the board. … Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 161 Okla. 300 , 18 P. (2d) 888 .

IMMEL v. TULSA PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY

490 P.3d 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 2021

Brown v. … BROWN v. CITY OF WARR ACRES Discussed at Length 1926 OK 453 , 256 P. 56 , 126 Okla. 175 , DOW v. WORLEY Discussed at Length 1950 OK 95 , 217 P.2d 835 , 202 Okla. 628 , BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF TULSA COUNTY v.

EDWARDS v. CITY OF SALLISAW

2014 OK 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 2014

City of Yukon Discussed at Length 1941 OK 205, 114 P.2d 477, 189 Okla. 147, CONSTANT v. BROWN Discussed 1939 OK 375, 96 P.2d 534, 186 Okla. 174, CITY OF MUSKOGEE v. … LINN Discussed at Length 1946 OK 217, 172 P.2d 397, 197 Okla. 369, LATTING v. CORDELL Discussed at Length 1910 OK 118, 109 P. 563, 26 Okla. 366, BOARD OF EDUC. OF ARDMORE v. STATE ex rel.

Wilson v. Gipson Ex Rel. Gipson

753 P.2d 1349 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1988

Stanhope v. Brown County, 90 Wis.2d 823 , 280 N.W.2d 711, 719 (1979). See also, Estate of Cargill v. City of Rochester, [ 119 N.H. 661 ] 406 A.2d 704 (N.H.1979). … Stanhope v. Brown County, supra.

State ex rel. State Board of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters v. Hamm

72 O.B.A.J. 362 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 2001

HARGRAVE, C.J. 1 The State Board of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters (Board) filed a complaint against the Respondent, Anita Susan Hamm, pursuant to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings of the State Board … The Board ree-ommended that the Respondent's license should be revoked.

Gelabert v. State

104 Okla. 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1924

Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 ; Voorhies v. Bissell, 80 Okla. 136 . 194 Pac. 896 ; Hall v. Bank of Commerce. 80 Okla. 40 . 193 Pac. 990 : Board of County Commissioners v. … Little. 80 Okla. 45 , 193 Pac. 986 ; Wheete v. City of Tulsa, 98 Okla. 4 . 223 Pac. 634 .

School Dist. No. 61 v. Board of Ed. of City of Geary

135 Okla. 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1928

This cause is governed by School District No. 86, Kay County, v. School District No. 71, Kay County, 185 Okla. 270 , 276 Pac. 186 . … J., MASON, V. C. J., and HARRISON, LESTER, HUNT, and HEFNER, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. State Board of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters v. Clark

183 P.3d 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 2007

The second rested on Clark's refusal to respond to official Board communications. {10 In Oklahoma State Bd. of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters v. … State Bd. of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters v. Hamm, see note 1, supra. 11 . State ex rel. Oklahoma State Bd. of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters v.

Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16

648 P.2d 26 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1982

The Minnesota Supreme Court was faced with the same problem and a similar statute in Morey v. School Board of Ind. Schl. Dist. … Winters v. Governor’s Special Committee, 441 P.2d 370, 372 (Okl.1967); Green v. Bd. of Com’rs. of Lincoln Co., 126 Okl. 300 , 259 P. 635, 637 (1927). 21 . Brown v. Banking Bd., 512 P.2d 166, 168 (Okl.1973).

State Ex Rel. City of Stillwater v. Excise Board of Payne County

156 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1932

The excise board has no such authority. City of Woodward v. Reid, 143 Okla. 204 , 288 P. 458 . The power and duties of the excise board have recently been forcibly before this court. … OLARK, V. C. J., absent.

Reid v. City of Muskogee

137 Okla. 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1929

Board of Com’rs of Garvin County, 78 Okla. 143 , 189 Pac. 361 ; and Goar v. Brown, 82 Okla. 227 , 200 Pac. 156 . Also, in Murray v. McGehee, 121 Okla. 248 , 249 P. 700 , it was held: ‘‘Under section 6151, C. O. … Citing Shelton v. School Board Dist. No. 22 of City of Tulsa, 43 Okla. 239 . 142 Pac. 1034 .

Oklahoma City Zoological Trust v. STATE EX REL. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS BD.

2007 OK 21 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 2007

Rinehart, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma for defendant, Public Employees Relations Board. James R. Moore, Sue Wycoff, Chanda R. … . ; Brown ex rel. Brown v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n., 2005 OK 88, ¶11 , 125 P.3d 1219, 1225 . [5] Star Fruits S.N.C. v. U.S., 393 F.3d 1277 , 1281 (Fed.

MAGNUM ENERGY v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE CITY OF NORMAN

510 P.3d 818 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 2022

Brown , 1941 OK 205 114 P.2d 477 State ex rel. Trimble v. City of Moore , 1991 OK 97 818 P.2d 889 Vinson v. … In support of its position, Board cites to a number of our prior decisions recognizing this municipal police power, most notably Gant v.