Case law

Bugg v. Cty. Election Bd. Pottawatomie

200 Okla. 386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1948

It is not such a board or commission as may be vested with judicial power. Montgomery v. State Elec. Bd., 27 Okla. 324 , 111 P. 447 . … Bd., 197 Okla. 157 , 170 P. 2d 193 ; Brown v. State Elec. Bd., 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 ; Love v. State Elec. Bd., 197 Okla. 165 , 170 P. 2d 191 .

Association of Classroom Teachers of Moore v. Board of Education of Independent School District 2, Cleveland County

567 P.2d 979 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1977

Accordingly, Judge Brown issued a writ of mandamus, ordering the Board of Education to recognize ACT as the negotiating representative of the professional educators in the School District. … In support of its argument, ACT cites several Federal cases similar to the one before us in National Labor Relations Board v.

STATE EX REL. TULSA CLASSROOM TEACHER'S ASSOCIATION v. Board of Equalization, Tulsa County

600 P.2d 861 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1979

That Wilson V. … That Wilson V.

Cherry v. Hutchman

205 Okla. 206 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1951

Lind v. McKinley, 196 Okla. 4 , 161 P. 2d 1016 ; House v. Mainka, 196 Okla. 174 , 163 P. 2d 225 ; Sarkeys v. Evans, 197 Okla. 304 , 170 P. 2d 229 . … Fair v. Brown, 40 Iowa 209 ; Adams v. Rogers, 158 Okla. 163 , 13 P. 2d 170 ; Henry v. Brown, 190 Okla. 109 , *211 121 P. 2d 594 . These cases are somewhat analogous to the facts in the present case.

State ex rel. Director of the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Smith

519 P.2d 477 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1974

In State v. … State v. District Court of Nowata County, supra. Plaintiff relies upon the Ohio case of United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v.

Butler v. McSpadden

25 Okla. 465 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1910

See Aldridge et al. v. Board of Education of Stillwater, 15 Okla. 354 , 82 Pac. 827 ; Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown et al., 19 Okla. 77 , 91 Pac. 849 . In the case of Neltograph Machine Co. v. … Pl. & Pr. 729; Parson v. Haskell, 30 Ill. App. 444 ; Mattoon v. Holmes, 14 Ill. App. 392 ; Green v. Blalack, 25 Tex. 417 ; Richter v. Fresno Canal Co. [ 101 Cal. 582 ], 36 Pac. 96 ; Davis v.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors v. Guardian Funeral Home

429 P.2d 732 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1967

In Bauer v. … Oklahoma Inspection Bureau v. State Board for Property and Casualty Rates, Okl., 406 P.2d 453, 357 .

Smith v. School Dist. No. 1

187 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1940

Shofner v. Mercer, 164 Okla. 170 , 23 P. 2d 623 . This latter case was followed in Johnson v. Brown, 180 Okla. 148 , 68 P. 2d 855 , where the county superintendent was required by mandamus to approve a contract. … Board of County Commissioners, 136 Okla. 85 , 276 P. 474 ; Faught v. City of Sapulpa, 145 Okla. 164 , 292 P. 15 ; School District No. 76, Creek County, v. Bath, 120 Okla. 204 , 250 P. 1003 ; Dungan v.

Watts v. Bd. of Commissioners Cleveland Co.

21 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1908

See Independent District of Boyer v. King, 80 Iowa, 497 , 45 N. W. 908 ; Bunton v. King, 80 Iowa, 506 , 45 N. W. 1050 ; Myers v. Board of Education of Clay Center, 51 Kan. 87 , 32 Pac. 658 , 37 Am. St. Rep. 263 .” … (First National Bank v. Bunting & Co., 7 Idaho, 27 , 59 Pac. 929, 1106 ; Green v. Custer County, 8 Idaho, 721 , 71 Pac. 115 ; Myers v. Board of Education, 51 Kan. 87 , 32 Pac. 658 , 37 Am. St. Rep. 263 .)

Berger v. City of Vinita

170 Okla. 214 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

Adair County Com'rs v. … In Board of Com'rs of Grant County v. Soucek, 128 Okla. 151 , 261 P. 947 , this court holds: "Under section 5727, C. O.

Application of Volunteers of America

749 P.2d 549 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1988

In cases involving special exceptions as well as variances, a presumption of correctness exists in favor of the Board’s rulings. See, e.g., Vinson v. Medley, Okl., 737 P.2d 932 (1987); Bailey v. … Brown v. Fraser, Okl., 467 P.2d 464, 467 (1970); Twist v. Kay, Okl., 434 P.2d 180, 184 (1967); Application of Shadid, 205 Okl. 462 , 238 P.2d 794, 797 (1951); Thompson v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. McCurtain County, Oklahoma, Excise Board

352 P.2d 896 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1960

In support of the contention first above referred to, protestant cites Kiowa County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Company, Okl., 301 P.2d 677 , and Osage County Excise Board v. … error complained of by protestant could have been cured by a supplemental appropriation made pursuant to 68 O.S.19S1 § 292, as construed in Excise Board of Oklahoma County et al. v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Forrester

72 Okla. 8 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1918

Judge Brown, sitting in chambers at Stigler. Okla.. signed an order purporting to revive said action in the name of the administrator. … Powell et al. v. Nichols et al., 26 Okla. 734 , 110 Pac. 762 , 29 L. R. A. (N. S.) 886; Boardman Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Atoka County, 70 Okla. 245 , 174 Pac. 272 .

Frayer v. Crain

196 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1945

Fooshee and Brunson v. Smith, 34 Okla. 247 , 124 P. 1070 . A judgment is a judicial determination either that no cause of action existed or that no defense existed. Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 P. 417 . … J., HURST, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, and WELCH, JJ„ concur.

State v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF IND. SCH. DIST. NO. ONE

339 P.2d 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1959

In the first paragraph of the syllabus to Board of Education of City of Ardmore v. State ex rel. … Friend v.

Avery v. Goodrich

138 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1929

In support of this contention, plaintiff relies upon the following cases: Thorn v. Browne, 257 Fed. 519 ; Gettys v. Newburger, 272 Fed. 209 ; Clews v. Jameson, 182 U. S. 461 , 45 L. Ed. 1183 ; Wilhite v. … Houston, 200 Fed. 390 ; Board of Trade v. Christie Gr. Co., 198 U. S. 249 , 49 L. Ed. 1031 , and several other eases from the United States District Court, Circuit Court of appeals, and Supreme Court.

Fitzgerald v. Bass

122 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1927

In the case of Forrester v. Boston & M. … In the case of Colley v.

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Huston

27 Okla. 606 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1910

Rep. 547 ; State v. Ansel, 76 S. C. 395, 11 Am. & Eng. Ann. Cas. 613; Jonesboro, F. B. & B. Gap Turnp. Co. v. Brown, 8 Baxt. 490 , 35 Am. Rep. 713 ; State ex rel. Stewart v. Marks, 6 Lea. 12 ; Bates v. … In the Board of Education of the Territory of Oklahoma et al. v. Territory of Oklahoma ex rel.

Oklahoma Union Railway Co. v. Hainey

96 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1923

It was alleged *218 the ear was running at approximately 25 miles per hour, and plaintiff was standing at the station of Parenthia for the purpose of boarding a car, and the motorman operating the car waived his hand for … Co. v. Richards, 23 Okla. 256 , 102 Pac. 99 .

Missouri, Kansas & Oklahoma Coach Lines v. Meister

330 P.2d 579 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1958

Brown v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. … In Williams v.