Case law

City of Ardmore v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.

172 Okla. 373 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1935

Co. v. … Davis, Kelly Brown, and Julian B. Fite in the preparation of this opinion.

Protest of Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board of Pontotoc County

164 Okla. 47 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1933

De Vitt v. City of El Reno

28 Okla. 315 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1910

Board of County Commissioners v. Hubble, 8 Okla. 169 , 56 Pac. 1058 ; Board of Commissioners D. County v. Wright, 8 Okla. 190 , 57 Pac. 203 ; Board of Commissioners Custer County v. De Lana, 8 Okla. 213 , 57 Pac. 162 . … Co. v. Sittel, 21 Okla. 695 , 97 Pac. 363 ; Ruan v. Brown, 19 Okla. 238 , 91 Pac. 894 ; Cameron v. Territory, 16 Okla. 634 , 86 Pac. 68 ; Friedman v. Weisz, 8 Okla. 392 , 58 Pac. 613 ; Board County Com’rs v.

Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Odom

172 Okla. 411 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1935

Allen v. Chamberlain, 134 Tenn. 438 , 183 S. W. 1034 ; Grant v. Nihill, 64 Mont. 420 , 210 P. 914 ; Yates v. McCullough Iron Co., 69 Md. 370 , 16 Atl. 280 ; Donnelly v. … In the case of Soltz v.

Ticer v. State Ex Rel. Holt

35 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1912

Ripey & Son v. Art Wall Paper Mill, 27 Okla. 600 , 112 Pac. 1119 ; State ex rel. West et al. v. McCafferty, County Treasurer, 25 Okla. 2 , 105 Pac. 992 ; Smock v. … Farmers’ Union State Bank, 22 Okla. 825 , 98 Pac. 945 ; Fritz v. Brown, 20 Okla. 263 , 95 Pac. 437 .

Robinson v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

932 P.2d 1120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1997

v. … See Jones v. Brown, 516 P.2d 546, 548 (Okla.1973) (venue statutes are liberally construed so as to prevent a party from being deprived of the right to have suit filed in a particular county).

Association of Classroom Teachers of Moore v. Board of Education of Independent School District 2, Cleveland County

567 P.2d 979 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1977

Accordingly, Judge Brown issued a writ of mandamus, ordering the Board of Education to recognize ACT as the negotiating representative of the professional educators in the School District. … In support of its argument, ACT cites several Federal cases similar to the one before us in National Labor Relations Board v.

Hardin v. Dale

45 Okla. 694 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1915

In Forbes v. … In Gay v.

Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of Hobart v. School District No. 56

25 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1909

See, also, to the same effect, Brown on Jurisdiction (2d Ed.) § 19b, p. 98. … Citizens' State Bank of Lawton v. Chattanooga State Bank of Chattanooga et al., 23 Okla. 737 , 101 Pac. 1118 . All the Justices concur.

Bugg v. Cty. Election Bd. Pottawatomie

200 Okla. 386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1948

It is not such a board or commission as may be vested with judicial power. Montgomery v. State Elec. Bd., 27 Okla. 324 , 111 P. 447 . … Bd., 197 Okla. 157 , 170 P. 2d 193 ; Brown v. State Elec. Bd., 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 ; Love v. State Elec. Bd., 197 Okla. 165 , 170 P. 2d 191 .

Board of County Commissioners v. Association of County Commissioners of Oklahoma Self-Insurance Group

339 P.3d 866 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 2014

¶ 5 This issue is answered in City of Choctaw v. Oklahoma Municipal Assurance Group, 2013 OK 6 , 302 P.3d 1164 . … Nelson v. La Crosse County District Attorney, 301 F.3d 820, 826 (7th Cir.2002).

Lakeshore Bank, N.A. v. Twin Lakes Bank

770 P.2d 547 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1982

Smith et al. v. Banking Board, 612 P.2d 257 (Okla.1980). … In Brown v.

City of Cherokee v. Tatro

636 P.2d 337 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1981

Tatro applied to the local board of adjustment for a variance pursuant to 11 O.S.Supp.1978, §§ 44-101 through 44-110, and, upon hearing, the board of adjustment denied his application for a variance. … See McGrath v. Brown, 190 Okl. 144 , 120 P.2d 624 (1941); Oklahoma City v. Harris, 191 Okl. 125 , 126 P.2d 988 (1941); Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v. Shanbour, Okl., 435 P.2d 569 (1968); O’Rourke v.

In re the Striking of Names of Members of the Oklahoma Bar Ass'n

287 P.3d 984 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 2007

It further appears to the Court that the Board of Governors have determined that no application for reinstatement has been filed by said members within one year of suspension. … Broken Arrow, OK 74012 Glen Joseph Blake OBA No. 18655 PO Box 50001 Tulsa, OK 74150-001 Michael Francis Bradican OBA No. 16622 4860 28th St S # C2 Arlington, VA 22206-1869 Mary Leigh Harris Brown OBA No. 12323 1005 N.

O'ROURKE v. City of Tulsa

457 P.2d 782 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1969

Brown, 171 Okl. 38 , 45 P.2d 109 ; Oklahoma City v. Barclay, Okl., 359 P.2d 237 ; Higginbotham v. City of the Village, Okl., 361 P.2d 191 ; City of Tulsa v. Swanson, Okl., 366 P.2d 629 ; City of Tulsa v. … Twist v. Kay, Okl., 434 P.2d 180 ; Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v. Shanbour, Okl., 435 P.2d 569 . It is the spirit of the ordinance the plaintiffs have attacked in their petition.

Berry v. Second Baptist Church of Stillwater

37 Okla. 117 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1913

Hancheth v. Ives, 133 Ill. 332 , 24 N. E. 396 ; Steeple v. Downing, 60 Ind. 478 . There is another reason why the attempted dismissal was without effect. The suit was brought by the board as such. … See Brown v. Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co., 128 U. S. 403 , 9 Sup. Ct. 127, 32 L. Ed. 468 ; Thayer v. Star Mining Co., 105 Ill. 540 .

Sewer Improvement Dist. No. 1 v. Foster

205 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1951

Dist. v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112, 167 , 41 L. Ed. 369, 391 , 17 S. Ct. 56 ; Embree v. Kansas City & L. B. Road Dist., 240 U. S. 242, 247 , 60 L. Ed 624, 627, 36 S. Ct. 317 ; Browning v. Hooper, 269 U. … Valley Farms Co. v. Westchester, supra; Hancock v. Muskogee, 250 U. S. 454, 459 , 63 L. Ed. 1081, 1084 , 39 S. Ct. Rep. 528 ; Withnell v. Ruecking Constr. Co., 249 U. S. 63, 69 , 63 L. Ed. 479, 483 , 39 S. Ct.

Application of Volunteers of America

749 P.2d 549 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1988

In cases involving special exceptions as well as variances, a presumption of correctness exists in favor of the Board’s rulings. See, e.g., Vinson v. Medley, Okl., 737 P.2d 932 (1987); Bailey v. … Brown v. Fraser, Okl., 467 P.2d 464, 467 (1970); Twist v. Kay, Okl., 434 P.2d 180, 184 (1967); Application of Shadid, 205 Okl. 462 , 238 P.2d 794, 797 (1951); Thompson v.

Ecker v. Ecker

22 Okla. 873 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1908

Reavis v. Reavis, 1 Scam. (Ill.) 242; Deenis v. Deenis, 79 Ill. 74 ; Spitler v. Spitler, 108 Ill. 120 ; Edwards v. Edwards, 84 Ala. 361 , 3 South. 896 ; McDonald v. McDonald, 117 Iowa, 307 , 90 N. W. 603 ; Reynolds v. … The Supreme Court of Arkansas, prior to the adoption of this statute in the Indian Territory, had held in Brown v.

Howard v. Arkansaw

59 Okla. 206 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1916

Lynch et al., 7 Okla. 650, 653, 656 , 56 Pac. 1082 ; Rhyne v. Manchester Assurance Co., 14 Okla. 555 , 78 Pac. 558 ; Brown on Jurisdiction, sec. 10. … Co. v. Beale, 4 Okla. 712 , 47 Pac. 481 ; Blanchard v. United States, 6 Okla. 587 , 52 Pac. 736 ; Vandervoort v. Board of Comr’s, 8 Okla. 227 , 57 Pac. 167 ; Hoffman v.