Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokla

10,000+ results

3.52s

  • Golsen v. ONG Western, Inc.

    756 P.2d 1209 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1988

    In Morrison v. W.L. … In Paclawski v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Jafek v. Public Service Co.

    183 Okla. 32 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1938

    In the cited ease of Phelps v. … Howard County (Md.) 82 Atl. 1058 , it was alleged that the pole stood so near the traveled road that it would collide with the “lazy board” of a wagon while the wagon was in the traveled portion of the road. In Coan v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Moore-Norman Area Vocational-Technical School District No. 17 v. Board of Trustees

    519 P.2d 497 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1974

    Latting v. Cordell (1946), 197 Okl. 369 , 172 P.2d 397 , quoted in Hines v. Winters (1957), Okl., 320 P.2d 1114, 1118 . … Sherrill v. Board of Trustees of South Oklahoma City Junior College, supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Save the Illinois River, Inc. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma State Election Board

    378 P.3d 1220 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 8, 2016

    In 1910, this Court decided Threadgill v. Cross, 1910 OK 165 , 26 Okla. 403 , 109 P. 558 . … CONCUR IN RESULT: Kauger (Joins - Combs, V.0.J.). DISQUALIFIED: Winchester and - Edmondson, JJ.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • BOARD OF EDUCATION OF INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 48, HUGHES CTY. v. Rives

    531 P.2d 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1974

    Civil Appellate Procedure Rules, Rule 1.22, 12 O.S.A., Ch. 15, Appendix 2; Board of Education of Okay Ind. Sch. Dist. v. Carroll, Okl., 513 P.2d 872 (1973). … Duncan v. Askew, 207 Okl. 542 , 251 P.2d 515 (1952); Board of Education of Okay Ind. Sch. Dist. v. Carroll, supra.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Higgs

    42 Okla. 171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1914

    Co. v. Ward, 32 Okla. 187 , 120 Pac. 982 ; A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis & Young, 26 Okla. 359 , 109 Pac. 551 ; Pacific Ry. Co. v. Brown, 14 Kan. 469 ; A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis, 31 Kan. 645 , 3 Pac. 301 ; St. … Co. v. Brown, 32 Okla. 483 , 122 Pac. 136 ; Midland Valley R. Co. v. Bryant, 37 Okla. 206 , 131 Pac. 678 . The plaintiff evidently relies upon sections 1389, 1390, 1391, and 1392, Comp. Laws 1909 (Rev.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Myles

    390 P.2d 489 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1964

    In Stubbs v. … In Scales v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Waples-Painter Co. v. Board of Com'rs

    44 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1914

    Crone v. Duncan et al., 36 Olcla. 517, 129 Pac. 711 ; Nicholson v. Barnes 42 Okla. 250 , 140 Pac. 1155 . By the Court: It is so ordered.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Excise Board of Coal County v. Hagar

    155 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1932

    From said judgment granting injunction, the excise board of Coal county duly perfected appeal to this court. … City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233 , 253 P. 481 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board

    171 Okla. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1935

    Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 , wherein it was held that limitations as to tax levies by municipal subdivisions of the state provided in chapter 122, S. … S. art. 1, sec. 10 1st cl.) for the reason that (lie vote of the people at the school elect'on was in the nature of a contract between the voters and taxpayers of the district and the school board and excise board that the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Truitt v. Diggs

    611 P.2d 633 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1980

    The Members of the Oklahoma City Board of Education, Paul English, Pat Potts, C. B. McCray, Armand Start, Freddye Williams, Floyd Don-werth, and Dene Brown; 4. … In making this argument, Appellant relies upon Hazlett v. Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 (1934).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Creek County Excise Board

    207 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1952

    Co. v. … In Empire Pipe Line Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Muskogee County v. Muskogee Gas & Electric Co.

    83 Okla. 167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1921

    Cleal et al. v. Higginbothem et al., 49 Okla. 362 , 153 Pac. 64 ; Lowe et al. v. Consolidated School Dist., 79 Okla. 115 , 191 Pac. 737 .; Brown v. … In Board of Commissioners of Kingfisher County v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • McCarthy v. Slater

    553 P.2d 489 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1976

    Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S. Ct. 1274 , ' 39 L.Ed.2d 714 . … This court in Swindall v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dority v. Green Country Castings Corp.

    727 P.2d 1355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1986

    Emp. v. Lockridge, 403 U.S. 274, 286 , 91 S.Ct. 1909, 1917 , 29 L.Ed.2d 473 [1971]. 13 . Belknap, Inc. v. Hale, 463 U.S. 491, 498-499 , 103 S.Ct. 3172, 3177 , 77 L.Ed.2d 798 [1983] and Brown v. … Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders, supra note 13, 468 U.S. at 503 , 104 S.Ct. at 3187 . 15 . Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders, supra note 13. 16 . Farmer v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Ellison v. Patman

    199 Okla. 500 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1947

    S. 1941 §391, it was the duty of the defendant board to proceed with recount irrespective of the service of notice upon Courtney in the manner and form and time provided by said section. The case of Looney v. … It was pointed out that such was the rule under the provisions of chapter 63, Session Laws of 1927, as was held in Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Odom

    172 Okla. 411 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1935

    Allen v. Chamberlain, 134 Tenn. 438 , 183 S. W. 1034 ; Grant v. Nihill, 64 Mont. 420 , 210 P. 914 ; Yates v. McCullough Iron Co., 69 Md. 370 , 16 Atl. 280 ; Donnelly v. … In the case of Soltz v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • RE: Reinstatement of Certificates of Certified Shorthand Reporters

    2025 OK 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 2025

    RE: Reinstatement of Certificates of Certified Shorthand Reporters ORDER The Oklahoma Board of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters recommended to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma that the certificate of each of the Oklahoma … to 20 O.S., Chapter 20, App. l, Rules 20 and 23, the certificates of the following shorthand reporters are reinstated from the suspension earlier imposed by this Court: Name CSR # Effective Date of Reinstatement Dennis Brown

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 47 1/2 v. Jacobs

    134 Okla. 101 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1928

    See, also, Dougherty-Nichols Construction Co. v. Town of Jenks, 115 Okla. 104 , 242 Pac. 167 ; Wilson v. Oklahoma City, 120 Okla. 266 , 251 Pac. 484 ; Barney v. … Board of Com’rs of Custer County v. Gustavus De Lana, 8 Okla. 213 , 57 Pac. 162 ; City of Woodward v. Manhire Grate & Equipment Co., 98 Okla. 83 , 224 Pac. 356 ; Pierce Oil Corporation v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • RITTER v. STATE

    520 P.3d 370 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 2022

    Fent v. Contingency Review Board , 2007 OK 27 Ranola Oil Co . v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma , 1988 OK 28 752 P.2d 1116 Collier v. Rees e, 2009 OK 86 Brown ex rel . Brown v. … Dept . of Transp . v. Pile , 1979 OK 152 603 P.2d 337 Mustang Run Wild Project , LLC . v. Osage County Board of Adjustment , 2016 OK 113 387 P.3d 333 Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co . V.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.