Case law

Thompson v. State Ex Rel. Cooksey

25 Okla. 741 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1910

(Rider v. Brown et al., 1 Okla. 244 , 32 Pac. 341 .) In Collet v. … Griffin v. Wakelee, 42 Tex. 513 ; Houston v. Emery, 76 Tex. 282 , 13 S. W. 264 ; Id., 76 Tex. 321 , 13 S. W. 266 ; Bradley v. McGrabb,, Dallan, Lig. 508, 509.

Woods v. Board of Directors of Union Graded School District No. 36

133 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1928

MASON, V. C. J. Union graded school district No. 36 of Stephens county voted bonds in th'e sum of $8,000' to secure a site, construct and equip a schoolhouse. … Thereafter, the school board employed an architect, who prepared plans and specifications and notice to bidders, which was duly advertised.

State Ex Rel. State Dry Cleaners' Board v. District Court of Nowata County

340 P.2d 939 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1959

Hawley v. … Cowan v.

CHILDERS v. ARROWOOD

2023 OK 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 2023

Second, the Arrowoods cite Brown v. McAnally , 644 P.2d 1153 (Wash. 1982). … City of Oklahoma City Discussed 2004 OK 7 , 85 P.3d 841 , FANNING v. BROWN Discussed 2006 OK 31 , 136 P.3d 639 , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MUSKOGEE COUNTY v. LOWERY Discussed 1977 OK 188 , 570 P.2d 948 , JONES v.

Oklahoma Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board

171 Okla. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1935

Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 , wherein it was held that limitations as to tax levies by municipal subdivisions of the state provided in chapter 122, S. … S. art. 1, sec. 10 1st cl.) for the reason that (lie vote of the people at the school elect'on was in the nature of a contract between the voters and taxpayers of the district and the school board and excise board that the

Larry Jones International Ministries, Inc. v. Means

68 O.B.A.J. 3327 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1997

In Champlin v. … Joiner v. Brown, 1996 OK 112, ¶ 6 , 925 P.2d 888, 889 . Timely notice of the appealable event is the sine qua non for laws governing the time to appeal in order to comply with Due Process. McCullough v.

Excise Board of Lincoln County v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

185 Okla. 436 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

Co. v. … Co. v.

Board of Education of Town of Ringling v. State Ex Rel. Benton

172 Okla. 437 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1935

Howard v. Rose Township, 37 Okla. 153 , 131 P. 683 ; Welker v. Annett, 44 Okla. 520 , 145 P. 411 ; Board of Com’rs v. Barker, 119 Okla. 206 , 249 P. 296 ; Hazlett v. … Board of County Com’rs, 168 Okla. 290 , 32 P. (2d) 940 ; United States v. Board of Com’rs (C. C. A. 10th Cir.) 54 F. (2d) 593; City of Fargo v. Cass County, 35 N. Dak. 372, 160 N. W. 76 ; State v.

Allen v. Wildman

38 Okla. 652 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1913

Co. v. Globe Hardware Co. (Ariz.) 129 Pac. 1104 ; Erickson v. State (Ariz.) 127 Pac. 754 . … Brown et al. v. First Na tional Bank of Temple, 35 Okla. 726 , 130 Pac. 140 ; Shuler v. Lashhorn, 67 Kan. 694 , 74 Pac. 264 .

Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Creek County Excise Board

207 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1952

The board appoints this trustee, but the board also appoints its treasurer. … Co., 151 Okla. 137 , 1 P. 2d 674 ; Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Carter County, 164 Okla. 126 , 23 P. 2d 189 ; St. Louis-S.F.R. Co. v. Choctaw County Excise Board, 173 Okla. 312 , 48 P. 2d 312 ; Protest of St.

In Re Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma

201 Okla. 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1949

In Brown et al. v. Capital Townsite Co., 21 Okla. 586 , 96 P. 587 , the case was tried on a stipulation of fact and judgment for plaintiff. … Dec. 427 ; Smith v. Taylor, 82 Cal. 533 , 23 P. 217 ; Levy et al. v. Chittenden et al., 120 Ind. 37 , 22 N. E. 92 ; Hilgenberg v. Northup et al., 134 Ind. 92 , 33 N. E. 786 .

Wayne Oil Tank & Pump Co. v. First Nat. Bank

96 Okla. 290 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1924

Brown & Bridgeman v. Western Casket Company, 3 Okla. 144 , 120 Pac. 1001 ; Board of Com’rs. of Beaver County v. Langston et al., 41 Okla. 715 , 139 Pac. 956 ; Ardmore Oil & Milling Co. v. … Doggett Grain Co., 32 Okla. 280 , 122 Pac. 241 ; Stump v. Porter et al., 31 Okla. 157 , 120 Pac. 639 .

Board of Cty. Com'rs of Co. of Tulsa v. Williamson

370 P.2d 837 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1962

Webb & Co., 148 N.C. 120 , 61 S.E. 670 ; Bennett v. Board of Commissioners of Rockingham County, 173 N.C. 625 , 92 S.E. 603, 605 . … For reasons stated, the writ of mandamus that board seeks is hereby granted, and defendant is directed to approve the bonds in controversy. WILLIAMS, C. J., BLACKBIRD, V. C.

TEXAS CTY. IRRIGATION & WATER RES. ASS'N v. Dunnett

527 P.2d 578 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1974

The application of this rule has recently been modified by Brown v. Banking Board, 512 P.2d 166, 167 (Okl. 1973). … The Brown decision recognized the substantial evidence rule as promulgated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Universal Camera Corp. v. National L.R.

State Ex Rel. Allen v. Board of Ed., Independent School Dist. No. 74

206 Okla. 699 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1952

Sweeney v. … In Hope v. U. S.

Webster v. Morris

129 Okla. 145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1928

In the case of Smartt v. … Com. v. Wyatt, Rand. 694; Rose v. Brown, 11 W. Va. 142 ; Welch v. County Court, 29 W. Va. 63 ; Abbott v. L’Hommedieu, 10 W. Va. 677 .

Keaton v. Oklahoma City

187 Okla. 593 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1940

The zoning ordinance here involved is the same ordinance No. 4475 mentioned in Oklahoma City v. Keaton, supra, and in Keaton v. Brown, 171 Okla. 38 , 45 P. 2d 109 . … The first three propositions were expressly presented and decided adversely in Keaton v. Brown, supra, Hubbard v. Oklaoma City, 177 Okla. 263 , 58 P. 2d 547 , and Beveridge v.

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 48, HUGHES CTY. v. Rives

531 P.2d 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1974

Civil Appellate Procedure Rules, Rule 1.22, 12 O.S.A., Ch. 15, Appendix 2; Board of Education of Okay Ind. Sch. Dist. v. Carroll, Okl., 513 P.2d 872 (1973). … Duncan v. Askew, 207 Okl. 542 , 251 P.2d 515 (1952); Board of Education of Okay Ind. Sch. Dist. v. Carroll, supra.

Pointer v. Hill

536 P.2d 358 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1975

In Brown Inv. Corp. v. Hickox, Okl., 369 P.2d 807 (1962), which is cited by the Court of Appeals, the plaintiff attached an affidavit to the appeal brief in an effort to establish proof of licensure. … In Loftis v. LaSalle, Okl., 434 P.2d 221 (1967), the plaintiff failed to-comply with § 855 at trial and submitted an affidavit *361 from the secretary of the Ada Board of Relators on appeal.

State ex rel. Oklahoma City v. Board of County Commissioners

516 P.2d 544 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1973

Commercial National Bank v. Robinson (1917), 66 Okl. 235 , 168 P. 810 ; Polin v. Retail Credit Company (1970), Okl., 469 P.2d 1004 ; Thompson et al. v. Rhyner et al. (1920), 86 Okl. 146 , 206 P. 609 . … WILLIAMS, V. C. J., dissents.