Case law

Crawford v. McConnell

173 Okla. 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935

Hunt et al. v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co., 71 Okla. 193 , 176 P. 410 ; 13 C. J. 492; Clark v. Utah Const. Co. (Idaho) 8 P. (2d) 454 ; Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil Co. (Tex. Civ App.) 271 S. W. 145 . … See Board of County Commissioners of Okfuskee County v. Hazel wood, 79 Okla. 185 , 192 P. 217 , 11 A. L. R. 709, together with annotations in 11 A. L. R. beginning at page 713. .

Board of Trustees of the Firemen's R. & P. Fund of Tulsa v. Miller

186 Okla. 586 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1940

The rule was also applied in the case of Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund v. Naughton, 180 Okla. 270 , 68 P. 2d 845 . … WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, CORN, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Robinson v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision

916 P.2d 1390 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1996

Lemons v. Lemons, 238 P.2d 790, 794 (Okla.1951). … We recently addressed this issue in Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists of the State of Oklahoma, 913 P.2d 1339 (Okla.1996).

Gay Activists Alliance v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

638 P.2d 1116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1981

Pyeatte v. Board of Regents, 102 F.Supp. 407, 413 , (W.D.Okla.), aff’d 342 U.S. 936 , 72 S.Ct. 567 , 96 L.Ed. 696 (1952); Rheam v. Bd. of Regents, 161 Okla. 268 , 18 P.2d 535 (1933). … It is important to note at this point that for the purpose of the injunction, the Board of Regents, as a body corporate, can be enjoined. Gay Student Services v.

Franks v. City of Ponca City

170 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1934

. * * *” Uhr v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 191 S. W. 379 . … E. 657 ; Standard Oil Oo. v. Henry (Ind.) 133 N. E. 742 ; Bowlin v.

Heisler v. Thomas

651 P.2d 1330 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1982

O’Rourke v. City of Tulsa, 457 P.2d 782 (Okla.1969); Cauvel v. City of Tulsa, 368 P.2d 660 (Okla.1962); Reaten v. Brown, 171 Okla. 38 , 45 P.2d 109 (1935). … Botchlett v. City of Bethany, 416 P.2d 613 (Okla.1966).

In Re the Purchase of the Suntide Inn Motel

563 P.2d 125 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1977

See also Bloomfield v. … Ramsey v. Leeper, 168 Okl. 43 , 31 P.2d 852 (1933); Brown v. Marker, 410 P.2d 61 (Okl.1965).

State Ex Rel. State Board of Education v. District Court of Bryan County

290 P.2d 413 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1955

See, for instance, Cecil v. Superior Ct. In and For Los Angeles Co., 59 Cal.App.2d 793 , 140 P.2d 125 ; Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Public Service Comm., 111 Mont. 78 , 107 P.2d 533 ; State Appeal Board v. … See Huerter v. Hassig, 175 Kan. 781 , 267 P.2d 532 , and the cases therein cited; Gresty v. Darby, 146 Kan. 63 , 68 P.2d 649 ; City of Coffeyville v. Wells, 137 Kan. 384 , 20 P.2d 477 ; State Appeal Board v.

Cripple Creek Oil Co. v. King

76 Okla. 316 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1919

Buzbee, 42 Okla. 206 , 140 Pac. 1146 ; Morgan et al. v. Board of Comm’rs of Logan County, 59 Okla. 290 , 159 Pac. 514 . … Carr v. Thompson et al., 27 Okla. 7 , 110 Pac. 667 ; Foulds v. Hubbard, 36 Okla. 146 , 128 Pac. 108 ; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Rickey, 33 Okla. 481 , 126 Pac. 735 ; Brown-Beane Co. et al. v.

Payne County Ex Rel. v. Empire Petroleum Co.

104 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

Brown as tax ferret. … Co. v. Porter, County Treasurer, 61 Okla. 171 , 160 Pac. 906 , where, it was said: “Under section 7449, Revised Laws of 1910, (section 9798, Comp.

Scott v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n

313 P.3d 891 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 2013

Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n, 2018 OK 85 , 308 P.3d 884 , Brown v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n, 2005 OK 88 , 125 P.3d 1219 , and Morgan v. … According to the Constitution of the Association, membership in the Association shall be open to public schools under the supervision and direction of district boards of education.

Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of Adjustment

73 O.B.A.J. 2914 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 2002

.]; Bailey v. Uhls, 1972 OK 147, ¶ 13 , 503 P.2d 877 [Denial of variance to erect sign.]; Brown v. … .]; Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v. Shanbour, 1967 OK 189, ¶ 15 , 435 P.2d 569 [Denial of special permit.]; Thompson v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Tillman County Excise Board

201 Okla. 624 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1949

ARNOLD, V. C. J. … Grubb v. Smiley, 142 Okla. 19 , 285 P. 38 ; St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Haworth, 48 Okla. 132 , 149 P. 1086 ; St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Thompson, 35 Okla. 138 , 128 P. 685 ; St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs of Harmon County v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

194 Okla. 359 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1944

Board of Com’rs v. Waldrep, 150 Okla. 228 , 1 P. 2d 711 . … See Board of Com’rs v. Johnston, 192 Okla. 203 , 134 P. 2d 335 , and cases cited. The cases relied upon by the petitioners (O’Hare v. Oakland County, 6th Cir., 136 Fed. 2d 152, and State v.

MOORE v. WARR ACRES NURSING CENTER, LLC.

2016 OK 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 2016

Oklahoma State Bank & Trust Company of Vinita , 1993 OK 117, ¶7, 860 P.2d 230. 9 Brown v. Oklahoma State Bank & Trust Company of Vinita , see note 8, supra. 10 Brown v. … Browning-Ferris, Inc. Discussed 1993 OK 117, 860 P.2d 230, 64 OBJ 2882, Brown v. Oklahoma State Bank & Trust Co. of Vinita Discussed 2001 OK 52, 29 P.3d 543, 72 OBJ 1933, CLINTON v. STATE ex. rel.

In Re Application of Gruber

89 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1923

State v. Williams, 40 S. C. 373, 19 S. E. 5 ; State v. Brown, 14 S. C. 380; Caldwell v. State (Wyo.) 78 Pac. 496 . … In Howe v.

St. Louis-San Franciso Ry. Co. v. Craig County Excise Board

204 Okla. 419 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1951

It is provided an election may be called by the school board to be held in March at the same time the general school election is held, and it is provided that the county excise board of the school board may call a special … J., LUTTRELL, V. C. J., and DAVISON, HALLEY, JOHNSON, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.

Bd. of Directors of Harper Twp. v. Bd. of Com'rs.

134 Okla. 118 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1928

Thte trial court granted and issued its peremptory writ of mandamus to compel compliance on thle part of the township board. The township board superseded the judgment and perfected its appeal. … The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directions to dismiss the application undter the authority of Hudgins v. Foster, 131 Okla. 90 , 267 Pac. 645 .

Greenwood v. Wilkinson

124 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1927

See, also, Hyde v. Ishmael, 42 Okla. 279 , 143 Pac. 1044 ; State ex rel. v. Brown, 92 Okla. 137 , 218 Pac. 816 ; Storm v. Garnet, 99 Okla 284, 227 Pac. 417 , and Foster v. Vickery, 111 Okla. 231 , 239 Pac. 141 . … Brown, supra, it was said: “Reasonable time means so much time as is necessary under th'e circumstances to do conveniently what the contract oor duty required should be done in a particular case.” In Foster v.

Continental Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

494 P.2d 650 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1972

In Exchange Oil Co. v. … Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 . Obviously the statutes under consideration need legislative clarification.