Case law

Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. No. 93 v. Dixson

202 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1949

See Rorick v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, 57 F. 2d 1048 , and decisions therein cited; California Highway Commission v. Ballard, 77 Cal. App. 404 , 247 P. 527 ; State ex rel. Urquhart v. … Johnson, 107 Fla. 624 , 145 So. 880 ; Reppel v. Board of Liquidation 11 F. Supp. 799 .

Hoover Equipment Co. v. Board of Tax Roll Corrections of Adair County

436 P.2d 645 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1967

City of Tulsa v. Mayes, County Treasurer, et al., (1935), 174 Okl. 286 , 51 P.2d 266 ; City of Hartshorne et al. v. Dickinson, (1952), 207 Okl. 305 , 249 P.2d 422 ; Sublett v. … General Electric Credit Corp. v. Andreen, (1958), 74 Nev. 199 326 P.2d 731 . and see also Bowls v. Oklahoma City et al., (1909), 24 Okl. 579 , 104 P. 902 ; Carroll v.

Horton v. State Industrial Commission

184 Okla. 145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1938

Tom Brown, chairman of the board of county commissioners of Rogers county, about the injury on the day it occurred. Mr. … In the case of Curry v.

Meadors v. Johnson

27 Okla. 543 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1910

Gardenshire v. Burdick, 7 Okla. 212 ; Sproat v. Durland, 7 Okla. 230 ; Board of Commissioners of Custer County v. Moon, 8 Okla. 205 ; Deny v. Wright et al., 13 Okla. 256 ; and Brown v. Territory, 15 Okla. 362 . … Bettis v. Cargile et al., 23 Okla. 301 , 100 Pac. 436 . All the Justices concur.

Excise Board of Le Flore County v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.

173 Okla. 238 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935

Board of Education, 98 Okla. 237 , 224 P. 712 ; Threadgill v. Peterson, 95 Okla. 187 , 219 P. 389 ; Wood v. Phillips, 95 Okla, 255, 219 P. 646 ; Myers v. Independent School District, 104 Okla. 51 , 230 P. 498 ; Eaton v. … Co., 122 Okla. 143 , 251 P. 1032 ; Board of Commissioners v.

Board of Com'rs of Carter Cty. v. Sch. Dist. No. 34

135 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1928

This cause is reversed upon authority of cause No. 18274 (Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. School Dist. No. 71, of Carter County), 135 Okla. 248 , 275 Pac. 302 , this day decided.

Commercial Communications, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Board of Public Affairs

613 P.2d 473 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1980

Ionic Petroleum, Std. v. Third Finance Corp., 411 P.2d 492, 495 (Okl.1966). 5 . Peyton v. McCaslin, 417 P.2d 316, 320 (Okl.1966); Ferguson v. Gulf Oil Corp., 192 Okl. 355 , 137 P.2d 940, 942 (1943); Mosier v. … Hayes v. Thornsbrough, 180 Okl. 357 , 69 P.2d 664 (1937); Wright v. Jordan, 161 Okl. 192 , 17 P.2d 408 (1933). 7 . See Wright v. Jordan, supra. West v. Mandansky, 80 Okl. 161 , 194 P. 439 (1921). 8 .

Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of County Com'rs of Kingfisher County

172 Okla. 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935

the case of Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County v. … Board of County Com’rs v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 P. 592 ; Butler v. Board of County Com’rs, 57 Okla. 748 , 157 P. 912 ; Western Paint Co. v.

Taylor v. Trow

191 Okla. 485 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1942

It would not have been void if it had named no person as chairman of the board. Hefner v. Cravens, 189 Okla. 558 , 118 P. 2d 652 . … Plaintiff relies upon Brown v.

Central Coal & Lumber Co. v. Board of Equalization of Le Flore County

70 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1918

The plaintiff appeared before the equalization board at the session at which the assessment was raised for the purpose of having the action of the board vacated an'd set aside. … The board refused to vacate its order raising the assessed valuation as returned by the assessor, and the plaintiff then filed a written protest and a petition against the action of the board, and the board then refused to

Jones, Superintendent of Public Inst. v. French

47 Okla. 125 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1915

In Herren v. Merrilees, 7 Okla. 261 , 54 Pac. 467 ; School Dist. No. 8 v. Eakin, 23 Okla. 321 , 100 Pac. 528 , and Brown-Beane Co. v. … In Herring et al. v.

Board of County Com'rs of Seminole County v. Griffith Realty Co.

205 Okla. 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1951

Bilby v. Halsell, 105 Okla. 215 , 232 P. 379 ; Fitzgerald v. Brady, 166 Okla. 21 , 25 P. 2d 1090 ; Chelsea Gin Co. v. Choctaw Cotton Oil Co., 177 Okla. 142 , 57 P. 2d 597 . … Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise Board, 194 Okla. 40 , 146 P. 2d 996 .

Bottles v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision

67 O.B.A.J. 1598 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1996

The Board argues in the alternative the proper standard of proof is a preponderance of the evidence. Generally, this Court will not address an issue not raised in the tribunal below. Pettit v. … We recently addressed this issue in Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists of the State of Oklahoma, 913 P.2d 1339 (Olda.1996).

Chidsey v. Ellis

31 Okla. 107 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

The rule is stated by the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma in the case of Berry et al. v. … Casper et al., 13 Okla. 335 , 73 Pac. 1102 ; Rogers v. Brown, 15 Okla. 524 , 86 Pac. 443 ; Carle et al. v. Oklahoma Woolen Mills et *109 al., 16 Okla. 515 , 86 Pac. 66 ; Board of Com’rs of Garfield County v.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Harper County Excise Board

191 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1942

Protestee would seem to rely most strong’ly upon our opinion in Tulsa County Excise Board v. … Pawnee County Excise Board v. Kurn et al., 187 Okla. 110 , 101 P. 2d 614 . There can be no doubt that the Legislature so intended by this act.

Gurney v. Ferguson

190 Okla. 254 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1941

Our conclusion here is fully supported by the reasoning and conclusion in Judd et al. v. Board of Education et al., supra. … Traub v. Brown, 6 Harr. (Del.) 181, 172 Atl. 835 ; Synod of Dakota v. State, 2 S. D. 366, 50 N. W. 632 ; State ex rel. Van Straten v. Milquet, School Treas., 180 Wis. 109 , 192 N. W. 392 ; Williams et al. v.

Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Cotton

196 Okla. 545 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1946

In Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of the City of Marietta v. … In Stephenson, Chairman, v.

City of Wilburton v. King

162 Okla. 32 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1933

In the case of Uhr v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 191 S. … Both parties refer to the case of Sappington v. Board of Commissioners of Jefferson County, 134 Okla. 253 , 273 P. 274 .

OKLAHOMA ex rel. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED COURTROOM INTERPRETERS v. ALVARADO

2025 OK 69 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 2025

STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED COURTROOM INTERPRETERS v. … STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED COURTROOM INTERPRETERS, Complainant, v. JAZMIN C. ALVARADO, Respondent.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

149 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1931

The protest presented by the railway company involves the drag fund levy of six townships in Bryan county, to wit, Colbert township, Brown township, Speairs township, Bokchito township, Bennington township, and Calerá township … J., CLARK, V. C. J., and KEENER, CULLISON, SWIXDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., absent.