Case law

Vinson v. Medley

737 P.2d 932 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1987

City of Durant, supra note 16; Brown v. Fraser, Okl., 467 P.2d 464, 469 [1970] and Whitcomb v. City of Woodward, supra note 30 at 456. 32 . See cases cited in footnote 31 supra. 33 . … Bailey v. Uhls, Okl., 503 P.2d 877, 880 [1972]; Brown v. Fraser, supra note 31 and Shelton v. Lambert, Okl., 399 P.2d 467 [1965]. 35 . Shelton v. Lambert, supra note 34 at 470. 36 . Twist v.

Buckner v. Oklahoma National Bank of Shawnee

25 Okla. 472 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1910

Butler et al. v. McSpadden, ante, p. 465, 107 Pac. 170 ; Ellis et al. v. Outler et al., ante, p. 469, 106 Pac. 957 ; Aldridge et al. v. … Board of Education of Stillwater, 15 Okla. 354 , 82 Pac. 827 ; Nettograph Machine Company v. Brown et al., 19 Okla. 77 , 91 Pac. 849 . In the syllabus of the ease of Ellis et al. v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Ottawa County Excise Board

201 Okla. 478 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1949

In the case of Black v. … and used for current expenses, but there is no requirement of law for such a transfer, and where the school board has not made such a transfer, an excise board is without authority of law to consider the surplus as having

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Marshall County Excise Board

330 P.2d 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1958

In the printed form estimate of needs which the School District’s Board of Education used, the amount written into the blanks opposite the particular items of need, named in the printed part of the form, as: “Remodeling or … Co. v.

In Re Choate

174 Okla. 446 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1935

On or about the 25th day of April, 1931, Caleb Choate obtained judgment for the Cunningham Bolt Company against Tincher & Brown in the sum of $158. … In construing our statute providing for an attorney’s lien, in American National Bank v.

ANDERSON v. PARISH

2026 OK 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 2026

OSCN Found Document:ANDERSON et al. v. PARRISH et al. ANDERSON et al. v. … Co. v.

Board of Com'rs of Kiowa County v. Kiowa National Bank of Snyder

166 Okla. 255 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1933

In the case of Bilby v. … In the case of Bilby v.

Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co.

32 Okla. 784 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

In the case of Crawford v. Board of County Commissioners of Noble County, 8 Okla. 450 , 58 Pac. 616 , it seems to be conceded that such an appeal would lie. In the case of Allen v. … The intention of the owner to dedicate his property to the public use is a prerequisite of a valid dedication. 13 Cyc. 452, and authorities cited in notes 51 and 52; Brown v. Oregon Short Line R.

State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. Lucas

297 P.3d 378 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 2013

Goodin v. Brown, 1956 OK 242 , 301 P.2d 652, 654 . . See, eg., State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. … of a board to determine is it acted beyond its jurisdiction or in excess of authority and then correct the board's decision by mandamus); Oklahoma City Zoological Trust v.

School Dist. No. 94, Grant Co. v. Gautier

13 Okla. 194 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

The same question was again before the Kansas supreme court in the case of Armstrong v. School District, 28 Kan. 345 . … (See also Brown v. School District 41, 40 Pac. 826 .) If the school board may then make a contract authorizing them to discharge a teacher for incompetency or other good cause, how is this power to be exercised?

Dancy v. Peebly

132 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1928

Board of Education v. Woodwarth, 89 Okla. 192 , 214 Pac. 1077 . Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. … Tinker v. Modern Brotherhood of America, 13 Fed. (2nd.) 130: “A statute should be construed with reference. to the object to be accomplished by it.” Brown v.

In Re Assessment of Property of Henryetta Gas Co.

49 Okla. 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 10, 1915

From an order of the State Board of Equalization, assessing its property for the year 1914 at $75,000, the Henryetta Gas Company appeals, and the cause is submitted to the court upon stipulation for judgment, entered into … TURNER and BROWN, JJ., absent and not participating.

State Ex Rel. State Board of Public Affairs v. Principal Funding Corp.

519 P.2d 503 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1974

Co. v. … Donaldson v.

Meinders v. Board of Education of Wynnewood School District 1-38

344 P.2d 572 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1959

In the case of McMann v. … In the case of James v.

U.C. Leasing, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Public Affairs

737 P.2d 1191 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1987

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Lumber Products Co., Okl., 590 P.2d 661 (1979); Batts v. Carter, Okl., 312 P.2d 472, 473 (1957); Collinson v. Threadgill, 122 Okl. 174 , 252 P. 827 (1927). 6 . Sheldon v. … Ambrozich v. City of Eveleth, 200 Minn. 473 , 274 N.W. 635 (1937). 10 . Bulman v. McCrane, 64 N.J. 105 , 312 A.2d 857 (1973). 11 . Colbourn v. Bell, Okl., 294 P.2d 289 (1956). 12 .

Jackson v. Sadler

172 Okla. 56 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1935

The case of Kiniry v. … In the case of Sparks v.

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Harper County Excise Board

191 Okla. 103 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1942

Protestee would seem to rely most strong’ly upon our opinion in Tulsa County Excise Board v. … Pawnee County Excise Board v. Kurn et al., 187 Okla. 110 , 101 P. 2d 614 . There can be no doubt that the Legislature so intended by this act.

Associated Classroom Teachers of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. Board of Education

576 P.2d 1157 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1978

In support of this proposition, the School Board cites Ballinger v. Sarkeys, Okl., 360 P.2d 515 (1961); Skelly Oil Company v. District Court, Okl., 401 P.2d 526 (1964), and McKee v. … In Ballinger v.

Nordam v. Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

67 O.B.A.J. 2937 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1996

This Court, in Vester v. … Dye, 731 S.W.2d 826 (Ky.App.1987); Isabella v. Commonwealth Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa.Cmwlth. 298 , 429 A.2d 1220 (1981); and Gonsalves v. Commonwealth, 71 Pa.Cmwlth. 352 , 454 A.2d 689 (1983).

In Re Assessment of Durant Nat. Bank

107 Okla. 65 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1923

See Board of Equalization of Kingfisher Co. v. People’s National Bank, 79 Okla. 312 , 192 Pac. 622 : Board of Equalization v. First State Bank of Oklahoma City, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 Pac. 115 : Brown v. … Also, see a discussion of this question in Bank v. Lander County Treasurer (C. C.) 109 Fed. 21 .” In discussing what was omitted property, the Supreme Court of Iowa in the case of Talley, Co. Treas., v. Brown, 125 N.