Case law

Lester v. Sparks

583 P.2d 1097 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1978

Worthan v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co., 535 P.2d 1025 (Okl.App.1975). 5 . Green v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 541 P.2d 200 (Okl.1975); Davis v. Town of Cashion, 562 P.2d 854 (Okl. 1977). 6 . … McDonald, 170 Okl. 117 , 39 P.2d 150 (1935); see also Toles v. Green, 544 P.2d 910 (Okl.App.1975) and Seay v. General Elevator Co., 522 P.2d 1022 (Okl.1974). 9 . Armstrong v. Anderson 417 P.2d 326 (Okl.1966); Steiger v.

Bill Morris Tank Company v. Martin

349 P.2d 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1960

Claimant assisted in lifting the pipe, carried the jack, and then placed a “lazy board” under the raised pipe. … See also: Stillwater Milling Co. v. Mott, 200 Old. 562, 197 P.2d 966 ; Choctaw County v. Bateman, Okl., supra; State Highway Department v. Powell, Okl., 258 P.2d *19 1189; Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. Brown, Okl., supra.

Melton v. City of Durant

521 P.2d 1372 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1974

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. … On review, the judgment of the trial court upholding the Board of Adjustment will not be disturbed unless against the clear weight of the evidence. Brown v. Fraser, Okl., 467 P.2d 464 (1970).

State ex rel. Pollution Control Coordinating Board v. Kerr-McGee Corp.

619 P.2d 858 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1980

Pollution Control Board v. Kerr-McGee Corporation, supra. … Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Brown, 477 P.2d 67 (Okl.1970). . See Wickham v. Beiveal, 368 P.2d 315 (Okl.1963). . Sunray DX Oil Company v. Brown, supra, n. 12; Morgan v. Bates, 390 P.2d 486 (Okl.1964). .

Traders Compress Co. v. Board of Review, Oklahoma Employment SEC. Com.

203 Okla. 564 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1950

This is an appeal by Traders Compress Company from an administrative order made by Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission. … Glass et al. v. Banfield Bros. Packing Co., 168 Okla. 217 , 32 P. 2d 713 ; Douglas v. Baker, 167 Okla. 348 , 29 P. 2d 619 ; Campbell v. Reynolds, 167 Okla. 365 , 29 P. 2d 941 ; State ex rel. Rives v.

State Ex Rel. Fent v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

74 O.B.A.J. 963 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 2003

Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, ¶5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . See also Kluver v. Weatherford Hosp. … York v.

Board of Cty. Com'rs of Tulsa Cty. v. Clardy

556 P.2d 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1976

Petitioner herein, citing Miller v. … This Court said in Marr v.

Eagle Creek Oil Co. v. Gregston

99 Okla. 181 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924

Merrick & Coe v. Modlin et al., 88 Okla. 83 , 211 Pac. 510 ; Whiteneck v. Board of Com’rs of Woods Co., 89 Okla. 52 , 213 Pac. 865 . … Merrick & Coe v. Modlin et al., supra; Whiteneck v. Board of Com’rs of Woods Co., supra.

Board of Com'rs of Wagoner County v. School Dist. No. 1

137 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1929

This contention cannot be upheld in view of the holding of this court in the cases of Board of Education, City of Sapulpa, v. Board of Co. Com’rs, Creek Co., 127 Okla. 132 , 260 Pac. 22 , and School Dist. … No. 7, Creek Co., v. Board of Co. Com’rs, Creek County, 135 Okla. 1 , 275 Pac. 292 .

Van Meter v. Manion

170 Okla. 81 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1934

To the same effect see: Rowland v. Miller (N. Y.) 34 N. E. 767 , 22 L. R. A. 182; Landell v. Hamilton, 175 Pa. 336 , 34 A. 666 , 34 L. R. A. 227; Lattimer v. Livermore, 72 N. Y. 174 ; Brown v. … Eq. 430, 141 A. 172 ; Frick v. Northern Trust Co. et al. (N. J. Err. & App.) 146 A. 914 ; Hunter v. Wood, 277 Pa. 150 , 120 A. 781 ; Brown v. Huber, 80 Ohio St. 183 , 88 N. E. 322 , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 705; Spahr v.

Pellegrino v. State, Ex Rel. Cameron University, Ex Rel. Board of Regents

74 O.B.A.J. 411 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 2003

McMillian v. … In Hardy v.

Sneed v. Sneed

585 P.2d 1363 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1978

Brown v. Brown, 384 A.2d 632, 633 (D.C.App.1977). 4 . See Ogle v. Circuit Court; Tenth (now Sixth) Judicial District, 227 N.W.2d 621, 624 (S.D.1975); Klein v. … See also Brown v. Brown, supra, Klein v. Klein, supra, and In re Marriage of Banks, 42 Cal.App.3d 631 , 117 Cal.Rptr. 37, 42 (1974) for similar holdings. 14 . Harvey v. Hall, 471 P.2d 911 (Okl.1970); Cullison v.

News-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of Com'rs of LeFlore County

112 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1925

case of Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. … Co-Operative Publishing Company, 104 Okla. 262 , 231 Pac. 251 , the Board of County Com’rs of Tulsa County v. Walker-Taylor Company, 104 Okla. 261 , 231 Pac. 252 , and the Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v.

Board of County Commissioners v. W X C Co.

473 P.2d 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1970

Concerning these districts, this Court, in Board of Com’rs of Lincoln County v. Robertson, 35 Okl. 616 , 130 P. 947, 949 , has stated: “ * * * Under the drainage act and its amendments (chapter 32 of Comp. … In Gutensohn v.

Martin v. Board of County Com'rs of Wagoner Cty.

397 P.2d 645 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1964

Whitson, et al, v. Board of Com’rs of Ellis County. (No. 7907) [ 65 Okl. 273 ], 166 Pac.Rep., page 423.” … In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Kiowa County v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board

172 Okla. 607 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935

The sole question here in *608 volved has been determined by the court in Morley v. State ex rel. … Board of Education, City of Tulsa, 171 Okla. 46 , 47 P. (2d) 170 , where it was held in paragraph 1 of the syllabus that: “Under the provisions of chapter 85, Session Laws 1933, a surplus balance and net unincumbered ad valorem

Shawnee Mut. Fire Ins. v. School Board of School Dist. No. 31

44 Okla. 3 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1914

The above case relies for authority upon Stump v. Porter, 31 Okla. 157 , 120 Pac. 639 ; Ardmore Oil & Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co., 32 Okla. 280 , 122 Pac. 241 ; Gruble v. Ryus et al., 23 Kan. 195 ; Pratt v. … Co. v.

Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa v. Franklin

263 P.2d 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1953

Plaintiff in error, The Board of Adjustment of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, appealed from an order entered in favor of Onis Franklin, defendant in error, and on September 15, 1952, filed its brief. … Under such circumstances, as held by this court in Durham v.

State Ex Rel. Roland v. Board of Com'rs of Carter County

160 Okla. 276 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 1932

This action was brought by taxpayers against members of the board of county commissioners of Carter county and Clarence L. Boyd Company, as provided by sections 8590, 8591 C. O. S. 1921 [O. … It was settled in Union School District No. 1, Kay County, v. Foster Lbr. Co., 142 Okla. 260 , 286 P. 774 . The contention was settled adversely to plaintiffs in error’s contention in Consolidated School Dist. No. 2 v.

Standard Paving Co. v. County Board of Equalization of Beckham County

135 Okla. 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1928

"On the other hand, the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Brown v. Houston, supra [114 W. S. 622], and this court, in the same, case, 33 La. … Under these circumstances, its situs approached nearer to permanency than did that of the sheep in the Wyoming case, or that of the coal in the Brown v. Houston Case.” In the case of Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v.