Case law

Hill v. Ohio State University

870 F. Supp. 2d 526 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 8, 2012

Brown v. County of Genesee, 872 F.2d 169 (6th Cir.1989). The parties in Brown settled the lawsuit and agreed to hire the plaintiff as a deputy at the third highest of seven possible pay levels. … See McCormick v.

Straight v. Stearns

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 1, 2022

While true that pro se complaints are to be construed liberally, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), “basic pleading essentials” are still required, Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 967 (6th Cir. 1997). Though 38 U.S.C. § 511(b) exempts certain provisions of 38 U.S.C. from this general procedure, none apply here.

Mills v. Sec'y of the Army

371 F. Supp. 3d 423 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 5, 2019

Little Traverse Lake Property Owners Assoc. v. National Park Service, 883 F.3d 644 , 657 (6th Cir. 2018) (quoting Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Lorion, 470 U.S. 729 , 743-44, 105 S.Ct. 1598 , 84 L.Ed.2d 643 (1985) ). … When reviewing military correction board decisions, courts use "an 'unusually deferential application of the arbitrary and capricious standard' of the APA." Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789 , 793 (D.C.

Gray v. Cincinnati Southern R.

11 F. 683 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 18, 1882

Brown v. Memphis, etc., R. Co., 5 Fed. Rep. 499; 12 Cent. L. J. 442; 11 Rep. 424. The reasonableness of regulations is a mixed question of law and fact, to be found by the jury, under the instructions of the court. … Day v. Owen, 5 Mich. 520 ; Bass v. C. & N. W. Ry. Co. 36 Wis. 450 ; Com. v. Power, 7 Metc. 596 ; Jencks v. Coleman, 2 Sumn. 221 ; Brown v. Memphis, etc., R. Co. 4 Fed. Rep. 37. It is a pure question of fact. State v.

Doe No. 1 v.Bethel Local School District Board of Education

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 7, 2023

Russell v. Tenn. Dep’t of Corr., 99 F. App’x 575, 577 (6th Cir. 2004) (order) (first citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); then citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); and then citing Clark v. … In Brown v.

Cousins v. Bray

297 F. Supp. 2d 1027 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 30, 2003

See Green v. Century 21, 740 F.2d 460, 464 (6th Cir.1984); United States v. Mitchell, 580 F.2d 789, 791 (5th Cir.1978); Moore v. Townsend, 525 F.2d 482, 485 (7th Cir.1975). … See Brown v. Artery Org., Inc., 654 F.Supp. 1106, 1119 (D.D.C.1987) (“[T]he public interest will most readily be served if prevention of the spread of racial discrimination in housing is given priority weight.”).

Smith v. Springdale Amusement Park, Ltd.

39 F.2d 92 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 23, 1928

Williams and Gerald Brown must be overruled. *93 From the affidavits on file, it appears that the defendant Brown has participated in the alleged infringement by use, by acting as a judge of dog races conducted at the Spring-dale … Ed. 717 ; compare Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co., 261 U. S. 45, 63 , 43 S. Ct. 322 , 67 L. Ed. 523 ; Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Brennan & Co., 127 F. 143, 147 [C. C. A. 6]; W. W. Sly Mfg. Co. v.

Bishop v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 2, 2025

See ACandS, 5 F.3d at 1263; Javetz v. Board of Control, Grand Valley State Univ. 903 F. Supp. 1181, 1191 (W.D. Mich. 1995)(and cases cited therein); Charles A. … under Brady v.

Steines ex rel. Steines v. Ohio High School Athletic Ass'n

68 F. Supp. 3d 768 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 10, 2014

See Hoot v. Milan Area Schs., 853 F.Supp. 243, 251 (E.D.Mich.1994); Sandison v. MHSAA 863 F.Supp. 483, 487 (E.D.Mich., 1994), rev’d in part, 64 F.3d 1026 (1995); Dennin v. … PGA Tour, Inc. v.

Hoffman v. Honda of America Mfg., Inc.

200 F.R.D. 370 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 8, 2000

With that motion, the Defendant, relying upon the decision of the Second Circuit in Brown v. … Although the Sixth Circuit had not addressed the precise issue decided by the Second Circuit in Brown , it did address a similar argument in Grant v. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1999 WL 717982 (6th Cir.1999).

Wallace v. Olabode

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 29, 2025

Hardin v. Straub, 490 U.S. 536, 539, 109 S.Ct. 1998, 104 L.Ed.2d 582 (1989) (citing Board of Regents, University of New York v. Tomiano, 446 U.S. 478, 484, 100 S.Ct. 1790, 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980)). … Because the statute of limitations for these incidents was tolled during the time Plaintiff’ grievances were pending, see Brown v.

Kelly v. Lopeman

680 F. Supp. 1101 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 27, 1987

. # 3) shortly after the filing of their Complaint and prior to receiving the Board of Review’s decision awarding Kelly benefits. The Supreme Court in Sosna v. … Decisions of the Board of Review are appealable to the Common Pleas Courts. Ohio Rev.Code § 4141.28(0).

In Re Huntington Bancshares Inc. ERISA Litigation

620 F. Supp. 2d 842 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 9, 2009

Huntington’s Board of Directors (“Board”) is named as a Defendant in this action. … The Pension Committee is responsible for providing recommendations to the Board in connection with actions taken by the Board in fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities delegated to Huntington and/or the Board pursuant

Centralsquare Technologies, LLC v. The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 15, 2026

Jolson THE NATIONAL BOARD OF BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL INSPECTORS, … See Shanks v. Honda of Am. Mfg., No. 2:08-CV-1059, 2009 WL 2132621, at *1 (S.D.

Board of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers Benefits v. Stevens & Sons Builders, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 7, 2026

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF … Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530–31 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Wolfe

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 30, 2026

See Bishop v. … Dibrell v. City of Knoxville, Tennessee, 984 F.3d 1156, 1160 (6th Cir. 2021) (citing Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 393-94 (1989)).

Haffey v. Taft

803 F. Supp. 121 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 8, 1992

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1278 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1278 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). Rather, this Court must follow the inquiry laid out by the Supreme Court in Anderson v.

Crane Plastics Co. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

119 F. Supp. 2d 749 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 19, 2000

See Allen v. Howmedica Leibinger, GmhH, 190 F.R.D. 518, 525 (W.D.Tenn. 1999). … See American Standard, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc., 828 F.2d 734, 740 (Fed.Cir.1987).

Hall v. Chambers Smith

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 1, 2023

Member Jim Bedra; and John Does, unknown Parole Members, Board Members, or other officials. … See Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989) (citing Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.10). A claim under Section 1983 accrues when the plaintiff knows or should know of the injury that gives rise to it. Cooey v.

Swigart v. Fifth Third Bank

870 F. Supp. 2d 500 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 7, 2012

(Doc. 126, Ex. 13 at 28, 44-45; Ex. 1-Mayer Brown Memo). … V. ANALYSIS A.