Case law

Lewis v. ACB Business Services, Inc.

911 F. Supp. 290 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 11, 1996

Plaintiff relied on two cases, Liggins v. May Company, 53 Ohio Misc. 21 , 373 N.E.2d 404 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas, 1977); and Brown v. … Smith v. Transworld Systems, Inc., 953 F.2d 1025 (6th Cir.1992).

Procter & Gamble Co. v. United States

570 F. Supp. 2d 972 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 23, 2008

United States v. Dalm, 494 U.S. 596, 608 , 110 S.Ct. 1361 , 108 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990); Carione v. United States, 291 F.Supp.2d- 141, 145- (2003). … Brown v. United States, 427 F.2d 57, 62 (9th Cir.1970).

Connecting Gas Co. v. Imes

11 F.2d 191 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 20, 1926

Taylor v. L. & N. R. R. Co., supra; Pittsburgh, etc., Ry. v. *194 Board of Public Works, 19 S. Ct. 90 , 172 U. S. 32 , 43 L. Ed. 354 ; National Bank v. Kimball, 103 U. S. 732 , 26 L. Ed. 469 . … C.; Steese v. Oviatt, 24 Ohio St. 248 , 253; Stephan v. Daniels, 27 Ohio St. 527 , 531, 536; Tone v. Columbus, 39 Ohio St. 302 , 48 Am. Rep. 438 .

Bonds v. Berne Union Local Schools

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 17, 2021

Plaintiff may AMEND his Complaint within fourteen days of this Opinion and Order to the limited extent he wishes to assert claims against the Board of Education. … Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 (2000) (quoting Pierce v. Soc’y of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 535 (1925)); see also Stanley v.

Carchedi v. Rhodes

560 F. Supp. 1010 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 7, 1982

Knapp v. Thomas, 39 Ohio St. at 392; Huff v. … In Schick v.

In re Trachsel

271 F. 779 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 2, 1921

Supp. 1919, §§ 2044a-2044k), claiming an exempt classification known as Division F of Class V; that is, as a “resident alien (not an enemy) who claims exemption.” … C.) 249 Fed. 981 ; Summertime v. Local Board (D. C.) 248 Fed. 832 ; Ex parte Blazekovic (D. C.) 248 Fed. 327 . Trachsel was, however, exempted by the local board, and its action is not under review.

Cytec Industries, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.

196 F. Supp. 2d 644 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 5, 2002

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) (emphasis added). See generally Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc., 879 F.2d 1304, 1310 (6th Cir.1989). … See Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Ohio, Inc., 15 Ohio St.3d 321 , 474 N.E.2d 271, 272 (1984). It is the province of the court to determine if a contract is ambiguous. See Lincoln Elec. Co. v.

In Re Wilson

411 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 13, 1975

Marie v. … See also Simmons v. American Budget Plan, Inc., 386 F.Supp. 194, 201 (E.D.La.1974). Treating the trustee's appeal as properly before this Court, then, his assignment of error is overruled.

Martinek v. United States

254 F. Supp. 2d 777 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 7, 2003

RMI Titanium Co. v. … In Byrd v.

Brinkman v. Gilligan

85 F. Supp. 2d 761 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 17, 1999

Id. at 689-90. 29 In Rockford Board of Education v. … In Akron Board of Education v.

Campbell v. Riahi

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 13, 2023

(Doc. 24-2, #1100–04; Brown Dep., Doc. 27, #1710). Brown reassessed Baker the next day, September 21, and concluded that she continued to experience withdrawal and was a “medium” suicide risk. (Doc. 26-2, #1610). … Campbell brings Monell claims against Butler County and its Board of Commissioners.

Center for Powell Crossing, LLC v. City of Powell

173 F. Supp. 3d 639 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 2016

measures to the Board. … Even so, this court’s role is not “to act as a super-zoning board.” Schenck v. City of Hudson, 114 F.3d 590, 594 (6th Cir.1997) (citing Exxon Corp. v.

Buckhorn, Inc. v. Ropak Corp.

656 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 11, 1987

Mason County Medical Assn. v. Knebel, 563 F.2d 256, 261 (6th Cir.1977). Furthermore, according to Fleet Aerospace Corp. v. … Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 812 (Del.1984).

Viciedo v. New Horizons Computer Learning Center of CoLumbus, Ltd.

246 F. Supp. 2d 886 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 26, 2003

See Ott v. … V.

Federal Property Management Corp. v. Harris

448 F. Supp. 560 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 15, 1978

For the reasons set forth in Kent Farms Co. v. Hills, supra; Cole v. Lynn, supra; and Brown v. Lynn, 385 F.Supp. 986 (N.D.Ill.1974), defendants’ policy is far superior to foreclosure. … Disposition of the remaining issues in this action is STAYED pending the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Ross v. Harris and Abrams v. Harris.

Kahn v. Schiff

105 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 23, 1952

Peabody v. Flint, 6 Allen, Mass., 52, 55; European & North American Railway v. Poor, 59 Me. 277 . … Punt v. Symons, 1903, 2 Ch. 506-515.

Ball v. Kasich

307 F. Supp. 3d 701 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 30, 2018

Co. of Southwest v. … Senter v. Gen.

Board of Trustees of the Southern Ohio Painters Health & Welfare Fund v. Sixth Region Remodeling, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2025

P. 56(a); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 (1986). … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986).

Ste. Marie v. City of Dayton

109 F. Supp. 2d 846 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 24, 2000

The Plaintiff bases this conclusion on his interpretation of Sutton v. Cleveland Board of Education, 958 F.2d 1339 (6th Cir.1992). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

United States v. Washington

266 F. Supp. 2d 781 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 6, 2003

266 F.Supp.2d 781 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. Dennis WASHINGTON and Ebony Brown. Case No. CR2-03-009. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. June 6, 2003. *782 Kevin W. … V. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Ebony Brown's Motion to Suppress and Defendant Dennis Washington's Motion to Suppress are GRANTED.