Case law

NATHAN ADAM COOK, SR. v. GROVEPORT MADISON LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et. al.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 10, 2025

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). These essentials are not onerous or overly burdensome. … Cavanaugh v. Cardinal Loc. Sch.

Ethridge v. Rhodes

268 F. Supp. 83 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 17, 1967

Monroe v. Pape, supra. … See, e. g., Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 , 38 A.L.R.2d 1180 (1954).

Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co.

803 F. Supp. 2d 765 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 22, 2011

Theoharous v. … Board Policy 1, ECF No. 116-1.

McGarry v. Lentz

9 F.2d 680 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 28, 1925

In the ease of Cummings v. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum (D. … Head v. Providence Ins. Co., 2 Cranch, 127, 167 , 2 L. Ed. 229 ; Barnitz v. Beverly, 163 U. S. 118 , 16 S. Ct. 1042 , 41 L. Ed. 93 .

Bronson v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF CINCINNATI

573 F. Supp. 759 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 14, 1983

See, Board of Education v. Harris, 444 U.S. 130 , 100 S.Ct. 363 , 62 L.Ed.2d 275 (1979) (Harris). … N.A.A.C.P. v.

International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

560 F. Supp. 169 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 30, 1982

Co. v. UTU, 625 F.2d 1357 , 1368 (8th Cir.1980). In a major dispute, the next step is conciliation by the National Mediation Board. 45 U.S.C. § 156 . … Co. v. Bhd. of Locomotive Engineers, 307 F.2d 21, 33-34 (2d Cir.1962); United Industrial Workers v. Board of Trustees of Galveston Wharves, 351 F.2d 183 , 188-190 (5th Cir.1965).

Wolman v. Essex

417 F. Supp. 1113 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 21, 1976

On its face, this aspect of the statute is constitutionally indistinguishable from the textbook provisions upheld in Board of Education v. Allen, 392 U.S. 236 , 88 S.Ct. 1923 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1968) and in Meek v. … But compare this profile with those in Roemer v. Board of Public Works of Maryland, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2337 , 49 L.Ed.2d 179 , (1976); Hunt v. McNair, 413 U.S. 734 , 93 S.Ct. 2868 , 37 L.Ed.2d 923 (1973); Tilton v.

Kuper v. Quantum Chemical Corp.

838 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 27, 1993

Brock v. Hendershott, 840 F.2d 339 (6th Cir.1988) (citing Freund v. … Several courts have held that a Board and its members are fiduciaries who must adhere to ERISA’s fiduciary standards if they have the power to appoint and remove Plan fiduciaries. Newton v.

Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

957 F. Supp. 1442 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 12, 1997

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 , 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2510 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). See generally Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1310 (6th Cir.1989). … .”); Brown v. Star Enterprise, 881 F.Supp. 257 , 259 *1458 (E.D.Tex.1995); Drinkwater v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Jenkins v. Hutton

967 F. Supp. 277 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 11, 1997

Citing Schware v. … See Schuler v.

Concerned Citizens of Southern Ohio, Inc. v. Pine Creek Conservancy District

473 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 29, 1977

Cf., Sailors v. … school board.

Board of Commissioners of Clermont County, Ohio v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 4, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986); Cox v. Ky.

Bossert v. Springfield Group, Inc.

579 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 20, 1984

Brown, Sr., Reservoir and created administrative difficulties. (Testimony of Carl Wagner; Defendants’ ex. 24). 6. … Russello v. United States, supra.

Moss v. Arnold

654 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 10, 1986

Rather, he must seek review of the agency determination through the Special Counsel to the Merit Systems Protection Board. See 5 U.S.C. § 1206 (a)(1); 5 C.F.R. § 1250.1 (a); see also Leonard v. … Wren v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 681 F.2d 867 , 875-76 n. 9 (D.C.Cir.1982) (citations omitted); see also Carducci v.

Board of Education of the Springfield City School District v. HBH Technology Inc

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 1, 2021

Plaintiff Board of Education of the Springfield City School District (“Springfield”) filed a memorandum in opposition to TTCO’s motion and, thereafter, TTCO filed a reply. Docs. 39, 41. … Browning–Ferris Indus., Inc., 474 N.E.2d 271, 273 (Ohio 1984)).

Board of Education of the Springfield City School District v. HBH Technology Inc

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 4, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON BOARD OF EDUCATION … Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993); Doherty v. American Motors Corp., 728 F.2d 334, 340 (6th Cir. 1984) (“[A] corporation cannot appear in federal court except through an attorney.”).

Ohio, Department of Human Services v. Sullivan

789 F. Supp. 1395 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 1992

In ICC v. … State’s Exhibit V, the affidavit of its expert, Dr.

Curia v. Pillsbury

54 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 15, 1944

United States v. Smith, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 607 ; Billings v. Truesdell, 10 Cir., 135 F.2d 505 ; Ex parte Billings, D.C., 46 F.Supp. 663 . Under the Selective Service Act 1917, 50 U. S.C.A. … Ex parte Billings, D.C., 46 F.Supp. 663 ; Billings v. Truesdell, 10 Cir., 135 F.2d 505 ; United States v. Smith, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 607 .

Board of Education of the Springfield City School District v. HBH Technology Inc

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 23, 2020

Renewable Energy Equipment Leasing, LLC v. Team Gemini, LLC, 2:14cv2687, 2017 WL 3475687, at *2 (S.D. … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

In Re Cardinal Health, Inc. Securities Litigation

550 F. Supp. 2d 751 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 5, 2008

Attorneys for objectors Ronald and Vondell Tyler, Susan Browne, and the Murphy Family foundation (collectively “the Murphy Group”) join Smith’s petition but only demand $3.7 million. III. … Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc., 102 F.3d 777, 779 (6th Cir.1996). An objector to a class-action settlement is not normally entitled to a fee award unless he confers a benefit on the class. Vizcaino v.