Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohsd

5,831 results

0.89s

  • Anderson v. Spoljarik

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 6, 2020

    See Hopper v. … In Williams v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hentze v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 7, 2020

    Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986); Cox v. Ky. … But, in Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law Examiners, the court, citing the importance of testing for school children, held the opposite. 970 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Anderson v. Spoljarik

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 12, 2020

    See Hopper v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Posey v. Secretary of Treasury

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 2, 2020

    Dist. v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kirkland v. Environmental Landscape, LLC

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 12, 2025

    See Anderson v. … Jacobson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Arnold Yerkes v. Ohio State Highway Patrol

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 2, 2024

    According to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, post-judgment “interest shall be calculated from the date of the entry of the judgment, at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board … EEOC v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Citizens Committee Against Interstate Route 675 v. Lewis

    542 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 10, 1982

    Image of Greater San Antonio, Texas v. Brown, 570 F.2d 517, 522 (5th Cir. 1978); National Association of Government Employees v. … V 3 — V 11.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • United States of America v. Doyle

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 21, 2022

    To be properly licensed, the dentist must hold a “current license from the state dental board.” (Id. at 463–64 (citing Ohio Rev. Code 4715.09(A))). … Prather v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Britt v. Hamilton County, Ohio

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 30, 2021

    Dang v. … Shadrick, 805 F.3d at 737 (citing Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)). When plaintiff pursues such a claim, “liability attaches only under a narrow set of circumstances.” See Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shine-Johnson v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 2021

    See, for example, Brown v. Konteh, 567 F.3d 191 (6th Cir. 2009). … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thompson v. Keith Foley, Warden, Grafton Correctional Institution

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 31, 2020

    Ct. 770, 785 (2011); Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 140 (2005); Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 693- 94 (2002); Williams (Terry) v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 379 (2000). … Jones v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 20, 2024

    See, e.g., Cullen v. … The first case Petitioner cites in support of this argument – Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Reed v. Columbia Gas Transmission LLC

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 22, 2025

    See Tucker v. … See Lutz v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Secretary, Department of Labor v. Gem Interiors, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 28, 2021

    Beech Aircraft Corp. v. … It is undisputed that for each job site, Defendants provide drywall, mud, tape, screws, metal studs, cement board, ceiling tiles, EIFS supplies, scissor lifts, boom lifts, forklifts, and scaffolds.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Project Veritas v. Ohio Elections Commission

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 20, 2019

    The secretary of state or an official at the board of elections may also file a complaint. /d. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Aerpio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Quaggin

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 26, 2019

    In 2013, Quaggin signed a Consulting Agreement (CSA) with plaintiff Aerpio and joined its Pre-Clinical Scientific Advisory Board to provide services related to therapeutics targeted at the inhibition of HPTPB. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sheppard v. Bagley

    604 F. Supp. 2d 1003 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 4, 2009

    In Gall v. … Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 , 107 S.Ct. 1756 , 95 L.Ed.2d 262 (1987), California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538 , 107 S.Ct. 837 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987), Skipper v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hardwick v. 3M Company

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 7, 2022

    Dayton Board, 433 U.S., at 414–420. … See Wilson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nathan v. KitchenAid, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 2, 2020

    NATHAN, , : Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:19-cv-226 v … : “When testing the actual blender power output at the blade using a dynamometer, a machine laboratories use to measure mechanical power, this KitchenAid blender with its heavy duty motor and advanced motor control board

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ahmed v. Houk

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 21, 2020

    In Carter v. … Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972). “No one factor is dispositive. Rather, they are related factors that must be considered together with any other relevant circumstances.” Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.