Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,831 results
0.80s
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 20, 2020
Blakley v. Comm’r of Soc. … Blankenship v. Brown, 874 F.2d 1116, 1121 (6th Cir. 1989) (quoting Poulin v. Bowen, 817 F.2d 865, 873–74 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (other citation omitted)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 7, 2019
See also Boxill v. … Brown v. Carpenter, 889 F. Supp. 1028, 1034 (W.D. Tenn. 1995) (“A plaintiff cannot bootstrap a frivolous complaint with a conclusory allegation of retaliation.”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 24, 2024
Brown, No. 2:23-CV-80, 2024 WL 84149, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2024) (Bowman, M.J.) (describing prior and current legal mail policies). … See, e.g., Salem v. Warren, 609 F. App’x 281, 284 (6th Cir. 2015); Terry v. Crawford, No. 3:21-CV-35, 2024 WL 1155854, at *5 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 18, 2024) (Newman, J.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownOhio Student Loan Commission v. Cavazos
709 F. Supp. 1411 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 10, 1989
Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Sante Fe Ry. Co., 470 U.S. 451, 466 , 105 S.Ct. 1441, 1451 , 84 L.Ed.2d 432 (1985); Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74, 78 , 58 S.Ct. 98, 100 , 82 L.Ed. 57 (1937). … Aguayo v.
Reversed by Ohio Student Loan Commission v. Lauro F. Cavazos, Secretary of the United States Department of Education and United States Department of Education, 900 F.2d 894 (1990)Cited 8 timesPublishedJohnston v. Hamilton County Justice Center
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 11, 2021
Brown v. Lewis, 779 F.3d 401, 411 (6th Cir. 2015) (quoting Silberstein v. City of Dayton, 440 F.3d 306, 311 (6th Cir. 2006)). … Brown, 779 F.3d at 411 (citing Sample v. Bailey, 409 F.3d 689, 695 (6th Cir. 2005)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownJordan v. Samsung Electronics of America Inc
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 20, 2024
Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989) (requiring pro se plaintiffs to satisfy “basic pleading essentials”). … See Glancy v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJohnson v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 12, 2019
Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932)(capital cases); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)(felony cases); Argersinger v. … Richter, 562 U.S. 86, 100 (2011); Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 140 (2005); Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 693-94 (2002); Williams (Terry) v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 379 (2000).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 7, 2025
Co. v. … Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1314 (6th Cir. 1989).
Cited 0 timesUnknownWatkins v. Columbus City Schools
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 2021
To that end, Watkins alleged 27 errors by [CCS], including the violation of Watkins’ procedural due process rights, specifically those required by Cleveland Board of Education v. … Next, Watkins claims “CCS, it agent or its Board” violated Ohio Revised Code § 3319.311 through malicious prosecution and the filing of a false report. (Compl. at ⁋ 53.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownMiller v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 12, 2020
Administrative Law Judge Nathan Brown (the “ALJ”) held a hearing on September 28, 2018, at which Plaintiff appeared and testified. (R. at 56-93.) … Robert v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownIn Re Cardinal Health Inc. Securities Litigations
528 F. Supp. 2d 752 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 31, 2007
See Goldberger v. … See Basile v.
Cited 75 timesPublishedCastorella-Sotella v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 10, 2020
decision unless that decision is contrary to or an objectively unreasonable application of clearly established precedent of the United States Supreme Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); Harrington, 562 U.S. at 100 (2011); Brown … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 10, 2019
Board v. Bradshaw, 805 F.3d 769, 773 (6th Cir. 2015) (a motion for a delayed appeal under Ohio App. R. 5(A) can toll the running of the statute of limitations if it is filed before the statute has already expired). … See Granger v. Hurt, 90 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 2, 2026
Barker, 407 U.S. at 530; see also United States v. Brown, 169 F.3d 344, 348 (6th Cir. 1999). A delay is presumed prejudicial when it exceeds one year. Wilson v. … See State v. Brown, 98 Ohio St.3d 121, 2002- Ohio-7040, 781 N.E.2d 159, syllabus.
Cited 0 timesUnknown626 F. Supp. 2d 797 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 6, 2009
Peterson sent a letter to the board providing additional information claimed to be needed as to Plaintiffs service record and symptoms. Dr. … See Harris v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · May 11, 2020
Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 F. App’x 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013) (citing Hicks v. Concorde Career Coll., 449 F. … Co. v. BMW of N. Am. LLC, 84 F. Supp. 3d 630, 649 (S.D. Ohio 2015). conduct. O’Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp., 4 Ohio St.3d 84, 447 N.E.2d 727 (1983).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 4, 2020
Dragon Bleu (SARL) v. Venm, LLC, 112 U.S.P.Q.2d 1925 (T.T.A.B. 2014); see also Nolan LLC v. TDC Int’l Corp., No. 06-14907, 2008 WL 11355576, at *2 (E.D. Mich. … See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 23, 2019
United States v. Brown, 169 F.3d 344, 350–51 (6th Cir. 1999) (internal citations omitted). … United States v. Brown, 169 F.3d 344, 351 (6th Cir. 1999).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSteelman v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 13, 2020
Ct. 770, 785 (2011); Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 140 (2005); Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 693- 94 (2002); Williams (Terry) v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 379 (2000). … State v. Brown, 38 Ohio St.3d 305, 317, 528 N.E.2d 523 (1988). Steelman admitted that he had been high the night of the burglary, and it is undisputed that he had overdosed just hours after the burglary occurred.
Cited 0 timesUnknown643 F. Supp. 2d 971 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 25, 2009
See also Bransford v. Brown, 806 F.2d 83, 86 (6th Cir.1986). Petitioner has failed to satisfy the prejudice element to overcome the procedural default bar in this case. … Petitioner’s sentencing and re-sentencing hearings were fundamentally unfair where upon the judge predicated said sentences on facts that only the five member panel of the Ohio Hearing Aid Dealers and Fitters Licensing Board
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna