Case law

Rheinfrank v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

119 F. Supp. 3d 749 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 10, 2015

Privitera is board certified by the American Board of Clinical Neurophysiology and American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. (Id. at 11711.) … Monroe v.

Reese v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 13, 2023

See ACandS, 5 F.3d at 1263; Javetz v. Board of Control, Grand Valley State Univ. 903 F. Supp. 1181, 1191 (W.D. Mich. 1995)(and cases cited therein); Charles A. … Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999), citing Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983).

Ruth Ann Cooper, DPM v. Neilmed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 9, 2022

Brown v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc., 817 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir. 2016) (emphasis added). … v.

Perry v. Warden Warren Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 28, 2022

Relying on Reedy v. … Because the two year statute of limitations governing Plaintiff’s claims against the John Doe defendants has now passed, see Browning v.

Hall v. Cullinan

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 31, 2023

v. Miller, 402 F.2d 134, 143 (8th Cir. 1968); see also Ginns v. … Brown Badgett, Inc. v. Jennings, 842 F.2d 899, 902 (6th Cir. 1988) (quoting United States v. Proctor & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 682 (1958)).

Miami Valley Conservancy District v. Alexander

507 F. Supp. 924 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 20, 1981

S. v. … In view of the holding in Economy Light Co. v.

Bishop

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 6, 2026

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). III. … Argue v. Hofmeyer, 80 F. App’x 427, 430 (6th Cir. 2003) (citing Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 467 (1983); Antonelli v. Sheahan, 81 F.3d 1422, 1430 (7th Cir. 1996); Adams v.

Taylor v. United States

782 F. Supp. 1207 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 9, 1991

MDDC’s President was a member of the Board of Directors of Mount Vernon Nazarene College, to which a portion of the equipment was eventually donated. … Estate of Kaplin v. C.I.R., 748 F.2d 1109 (6th Cir.1984); Goldman v. C.I.R., 388 F.2d 476 (6th Cir.1967).

Haynes v. Sports Car Club of America

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 27, 2022

Haynes attempted to run for a seat on the board of directors in 2020, but another member lodged a grievance against Haynes, which resulted in an internal disciplinary hearing. … Everett v. Verizon Wireless, Inc., 460 F.3d 818, 829 (6th Cir. 2006) (quoting Olden v. LaFarge Corp., 383 F.3d 495, 503 n.1 (6th Cir. 2004)); see also Siding & Insulation Co. v. Acuity Mut. Ins.

Prunty v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Food & Nutrition Service

573 F. Supp. 1015 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 31, 1983

Kulkin v. Bergland, 626 F.2d 181, 184 (1st Cir.1980); Studt v. United States, 607 F.2d 1216, 1218 (8th Cir.1978); Nowicki v. … See, Bradley v. Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 716-724 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2018-2022 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974); Cass Corridor Food Coop. v. United States, 512 F.Supp. 925, 931 (1981).

United States v. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co.

119 F. Supp. 3d 793 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 29, 2015

In United States v. … See 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(B); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1177 (6th Cir.1983). Because the probation office is an arm of the court, it would likewise be exempt from FOIA requests. U.S.

Horton

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 1, 2026

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). B. … Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 100 (1983); Lawson v. Shelby Cty., 211 F.3d 331, 334 (6th Cir. 2000).

Warman v. Mount St. Joseph University

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 25, 2023

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007)). … See Kuyat v.

Capsa Solutions, LLC. v. Concord Healthcare Group, LLC.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 4, 2019

Osborn v. Griffin, 865 F.3d 417, 458 (6th Cir. 2017) (citing Funkhouser v. J.B. Preston Co., 290 U.S. 163, 168 (1933)). … U.S.C. § 1961(a) further dictates that, “[s]uch interest shall be calculated from the date of the entry of the judgment at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board

Grooms v. Marshall

142 F. Supp. 2d 927 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 20, 2001

V. … Thompson, 490 U.S. 454, 460 , 109 S.Ct. 1904 , 104 L.Ed.2d 506 (1989) (citing Board of Regents of State Colls. v.

Johari v. Ginther

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 3, 2021

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). … Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). B.

Tassone v. Gill

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 10, 2021

§ 2254(a); Wilson v. Corcoran, 562 U.S. 1 (2010); Lewis v. Jeffers, 497 U.S. 764, 780 (1990); Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982), Barclay v. Florida, 463 U.S. 939 (1983). … Ct. 770, 785 (2011); Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 140 (2005); Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 693-94 (2002); Williams (Terry) v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 379 (2000).

Norton Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Village of St. Bernard

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 20, 2023

Bernard, the Board of Zoning Appeals, and Building Commissioner Gerald L. Stoker—have responded to Norton’s objections. (Doc. 57). I. … Co. v.

Sinomax USA, Inc. v. American Signature, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 2, 2022

Brown v. Mohr, No. 2:13-CV-0006, 2017 WL 2832631, at *1 (S.D. Ohio June 30, 2017), aff'd, No. 2:13-CV-06, 2017 WL 10056799 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2017) (citing United States v. … Bd. of Educ. v. DeWine, 335 F.R.D. 115, 119 (N.D. Ohio 2020) (alteration in original) (quoting Surles ex rel. Johnson v. Greyhound, Lines, Inc., 474 F.3d 288, 305 (6th Cir. 2007)).

Ursic v. Warden, Bellmont Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 13, 2021

See United States v. Waters, 158 F.3d 933, 936 (6" Cir. 1998) (citing Marshall v. … This comprehensive assessment is entitled to double deference, Brown v. Konteh, 567 F.3d 191, 204- 05 (6th Cir. 2009), and Petitioner has failed to meet his high burden to overturn it.