Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohsd

5,831 results

1.85s

  • Kramer v. American Electric Power Executive Severance Plan

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 13, 2023

    See Deal v. Kegler Brown Hill & Ritter Co. L.P.A., 551 F. … Titled the “Executive Severance Plan,” membership in the Plan is highly limited, and membership requires approval from the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors or the company’s Chief Executive

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smallwood v. Highland County Sheriff

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 11, 2024

    Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 507 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Maxey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

    689 F. Supp. 2d 946 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 2, 2010

    Anderson, 477 U.S. at 247-48 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 (emphasis added); see generally Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc., 879 F.2d 1304, 1310 (6th Cir.1989). … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); United States v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Snowden v. Warden Allen Correctional Institution

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 18, 2020

    State v. Brown, 38 Ohio St.3d 305, 319, 528 N.E.2d 523 (1988). … Ct. 770, 785 (2011); Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 140 (2005); Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 693- 94 (2002); Williams (Terry) v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 379 (2000).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co.

    281 F. 1007 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 19, 1916

    Anti-Trust Dec. 246, 251; United States v. Eastman Kodak Co. (D. C.) 226 Fed. 62, 81 ; United States v. Reading Co. (D. C., three judges sitting) 226 Fed. 229, 286 ; United States v. United States Steel Corporation (D. … And in United States v. Union Pacific R. R. Co. et al., Pamph. 19, 20 (D.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cincom Systems, Inc. v. LABWARE, INC.

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 12, 2023

    (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield, 825 F.3d 299, 308 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983); McCleese v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Columbus Merchandise Co. v. Kline

    248 F. 296 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 1, 1917

    Benedict v. Peters, supra; Boyer v. Knowlton Co. supra; Boyer v. Howland, 31 Ohio Cir. Ct. R. 139 (11 N. S. 564, 568); National Cash Register Co. v. Closs, supra; Engleright v. Annesser, supra; Whitaker v. … The same court, but differently constituted as to its majority, overruled the Closs Case in Oglesby v. National Box Board Co., 25 Ohio Cir. Ct. R. N.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. DeWine

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 30, 2024

    Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989) (citing Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235 (1989)) (“the appropriate statute of limitations for 42 U.S.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hall v. Chambers Smith

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 19, 2022

    Kitchen v. Aristech Chemical, 769 F. Supp 254, 255 (S. D. Ohio 1991). Generally, Courts can only disqualify counsel on the basis of conflict of interest. Wellman v. … While the pleadings of pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than pleadings drafted by lawyers, Ruhl v. Brown, No. 2:13-CV-00716, 2015 WL 5117951, at *2 (S.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dixon v. Warden, Dayton Correctional Institution

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 18, 2024

    State v. Brown, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 27738, 2018-Ohio-3068, ¶ 47 (citing cases). For that reason, self-defense and aggravated-assault or voluntary-manslaughter instructions are incompatible in most cases. … Brown v. Konteh, 567 F.3d 191, 205 (6th Cir. 2009). In a sufficiency of the evidence habeas corpus case, deference should be given to the trier-of-fact's verdict under Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. McCrackin

    189 F. Supp. 632 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 7, 1960

    MeCrackin, during all the taxable years herein involved has been, and still is, a Presbyterian minister employed by the Board of Trustees of West Cincinnati-St. Barnabas Church, Cincinnati, Ohio. 9. … The syllabus of Union Properties, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mécanique C.N.C., Inc. v. Durr Environmental, Inc.

    304 F. Supp. 2d 971 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 9, 2004

    See, e.g., Delorise Brown, M.D., Inc. v. Allio, 86 Ohio App.3d 359 , 620 N.E.2d 1020, 1021-22 (Ohio App.1993); Urban Indus. of Ohio, Inc. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Reese v. Carmichael

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 14, 2020

    Reese brought this shareholder derivative action, on behalf of nominal Defendant Fifth Third Bancorp, against Fifth Third’s Board of Directors. (Doc. 1.) … See also Shane Group., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016); Kondash v. Kia Motors Am., Inc., 767 F. App'x 635, 637 (6th Cir. 2019).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Evick v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 15, 2023

    Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977), quoting North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969). The Double Jeopardy Clause was held to be applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment in Benton v. … . § 2254(d)(1); Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86 (2011); Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 140 (2005); Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 693-94 (2002); Williams (Terry) v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 379 (2000).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tingler v. Governor Mike Dewine

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 13, 2025

    Martin v. Overton, 391 F.3d 710, 712 (6th Cir. 2004). Nonetheless, “basic pleading essentials” are still required. Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Creachbaum v. Warden, London Correctional Institution

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 30, 2020

    Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977), quoting North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969). The Double Jeopardy Clause was held to be applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment in Benton v. … Because the Second District’s decision in this case is neither contrary to nor an objectively unreasonable application of Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Copaz Packing Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers, Local 7A

    591 F. Supp. 1502 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 13, 1984

    United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U.S. 593, 399 , 80 S.Ct. 1358 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960); Morgan Services, Inc. v. … Local 323, Chicago and Central States Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, 724 F.2d 1217, 1221 (6th Cir.1984).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pippin v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 13, 2020

    He began his argument on this Assignment by citing the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment and citing Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 794 (1969), and Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977). … Brown, 432 U.S. at 165 (1977), quoting North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Estate of Renato Marti v. Rice

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 10, 2023

    Rouster v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Johnson v. Chambers-Smith

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 28, 2023

    Pettus-Brown v. Phelps, No. 2:18-CV-00082, 2018 WL 5960821, at *13 (S.D. Ohio 2018) (Jolson, M.J.) (collecting cases). … See Mall v. Merlo, No. 2:18-CV-00430, 2019 WL 2521165, *3 (S.D. Ohio 2019) (Vascura, M.J.) (citing Pettus-Brown, 2018 WL 5960821). II.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.