Case law

Airline Professionals Ass'n v. ABX Air, Inc.

109 F. Supp. 2d 831 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 13, 2000

United States v. Thompson, 82 F.3d 700, 702 (6th Cir.1996). … Relying on Marsh as well as Pinero Schroeder v.

Weaver v. O'Grady

33 Ohio Misc. 97 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 27, 1972

Stale Board of Elections (1969), 393 U. S. 544 ; Hanover Shoe v. United Shoe Machinery Corp. (1969), 392 U. S. 481 ; England v. State Board of Medical Examiners (1964), 375 U. S. 411 ; Chicot County Drainage Dist. v. … United Shoe Machinery Corp., supra, at 496, or by deciding an issue of first impression whose resolution was not clearly foreshadowed, see, e. g., Allen v. State Board of Elections, supra, at 572.

Automobile Consumer Services, Inc. v. PureCars Technologies, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 29, 2022

McFarland Plaintiffs, : : v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983).

Hill v. Pell

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 28, 2023

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. U.S., 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir. 1953), quoted in Anderson v. U.S., 39 F. App’x 132, 135 (6th Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 616 (6th Cir. 2011). Therefore, this Court has the discretion to overlook technical violations. E.g., Ruhl v. Brown, No. 2:13-CV-00716, 2015 WL 5117951, at *2-3 (S.D.

Day v. NLO

851 F. Supp. 869 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 22, 1994

Board of Educ., 637 F.Supp. 1022, 1027 (N.D.N.Y.1986) (same), aff'd, 820 F.2d 587 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 981 , 108 S.Ct. 495 , 98 L.Ed.2d 494 (1987); see also Dep’t of Educ. v. … Because a court is “not free to substitute [its] notion of sound educational policy for those of the local school,” Thomas v. Cincinnati Bd. of Educ., 918 F.2d 618, 627 (6th Cir.1990); see Board of Educ. v.

Adkins v. General Motors Corp.

556 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 6, 1983

Hill v. Iron Workers Local Union 25, *456 520 F.2d 40 (6th Cir.1975); Hazen v. Western Union Telegraph Company, 518 F.2d 766 (6th Cir.1975). Williams v. AMF, Inc., 512 F.Supp. 1048, 1055 (S.D. Ohio 1981). … If that inquiry is answered in the affirmative, a federal or state court must defer the matter to the National Labor Relations' Board (NLRB), to avoid any conflict between federal statutes and state law.

Bishop v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 20, 2025

Ground Three: Witness misconduct, for the states main witness Tom Brown committing perjury several times at trial. … McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 386-87 (2013). In Souter v.

United States v. Krechting

26 F. Supp. 266 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 11, 1939

Currin et al. v. Henry A. … In Nebbia v.

Murphy v. Kettering Adventist Healthcare d/b/a Kettering Health Network

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 7, 2023

See Gavitt v. … Defendant points to Hutt and Brown v. Allied Commc’ns Corp., No. 1:18-cv-689, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29947, at *13, 2020 WL 868207, at *6 (S.D.

Arocho v. Ohio University

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 25, 2020

Brown University, the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling that a plaintiff, who was a student at Providence College, could not state a claim under Title IX against Brown University when … she was sexually assaulted on Brown’s campus. 896 F.3d 127 (1st Cir. 2018).

Griffith v. Columbus Area Chapter of the American Red Cross

678 F. Supp. 182 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 1, 1988

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California, 463 U.S. 1, 27-28 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2855-56 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Association, 388 F.2d 609, 612 (2nd Cir.1967).

Westbrook v. City Of Cincinnati

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 2023

Specifically on point here, it is clearly established in this Circuit that “an individual has a constitutional right not to be tased when he or she is not actively resisting.”4 Browning v. … But the Browning court noted that the right of one not to be tased while not actively resisting was clearly established “[c]ertainly by 2018.” See Browning, 18 F.4th at 525; see also Landis v. Baker, 297 F.

De Boer Structures (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Shaffer Tent & Awning Co.

187 F. Supp. 2d 910 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 11, 2001

DeBoer further testified that, as of August 1998, it was the decision of the board to not purchase Shaffer outright. … Burr v. Board of Commissioners of Stark Co., 23 Ohio St.3d 69 , 491 N.E.2d 1101 (1986) (syllabus).

NFocus Consulting Inc. v. Uhl

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 19, 2020

(quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Lipman v.

Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees AFL-CIO v. American Capital Strategies, Ltd.

546 F. Supp. 2d 546 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 27, 2008

Gordon O’Brien (“O’Brien”), an ACS representative and a member of DSI’s Board of Directors, was also present to monitor the hearing. (ACS Mot. Summ. J. p. 8, R. at 86.) … Adickes v. S.H.

Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Wilhem

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 5, 2020

Here, Plaintiffs argue that the Court’s reliance on Pirincin v. Board of Elections, 368 F. Supp. 64 (N.D. Ohio 1973), and Werme v. … See Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief, Doc. 44 at 11 (“Pirincin v. Board of Elections, 368 F. Supp. 64 (N.D. Ohio), aff’d, 414 U.S. 990 (1973), does not support OEC’s argument.

Waldon v. Cincinnati Public Schools

89 F. Supp. 3d 944 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 3, 2015

In fact, the CPS civil service office corresponded with the Ohio Parole Board that CPS “would be happy to offer Mr. Waldon employment in the near future.” Following Mr. … Apprenticeship Commt. v. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm., 66 Ohio St.2d 192 , 421 N.E.2d 128 (1981). V.

Hagedorn v. Veritas Software Corp.

250 F. Supp. 2d 857 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 9, 2002

Snavely Co. v. Brown Constr. Co., 16 Ohio Misc. 50 , 239 N.E.2d 759, 762 (1968)(doc. 6). Plaintiff then points out two paragraphs that demonstrate a lack of mutuality in the agreement (Id.). … In Mercuro v.

Gerhardt v. Lazaroff

221 F. Supp. 2d 827 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 25, 2002

Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793 , 120 S.Ct. 2530 , 147 L.Ed.2d 660 (2000); American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio v. Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board, 243 F.3d 289 (6th Cir.2001). … However, the same cannot be said for the statute at issue in Board of Education v.

First Star Logistics, LLC v. Cuthbertson

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 1, 2023

Dlott v. … See Tovar Snow Pros., Inc. v. ACE Am. Ins. Co., No. 20 C 1060, 2020 WL 5658705, at *2 (N.D. Ill.