Case law

Billiter v. Aufdemkampe

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 28, 2020

Brown v. Stacy, No. CV 16-91-DLB-EBA, 2018 WL 1526168, at *2 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 28, 2018) (quoting Ross v. Blake, 136 S. Ct. 1850, 1855, 195 L. Ed. 2d 117 (2016)). … Furthermore, although pro se complaints are to be construed liberally, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), “basic pleading essentials” are still required, Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989).

Gwynn v. Ranco, Inc.

36 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 26, 1940

“The prior use of such heater and plate makes, Gwynn’s aggregation the boldest case of mere analogous double use, which the courts have held invariably to be unpatentable, from the Fish Refrigerator case, Brown et al. v. … Co. v. Toledo, P. C. & L. Ry. Co., 6 Cir., 172 F. *588 371 ; Elliott & Co. v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co., 3 Cir., 181 F. 345 .

Moore v. Florida Bank of Commerce

654 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 1986

See United States v. Tarr, 589 F.2d 55 (1st Cir.1978) (the words “to engage in the business of” strongly imply more than one isolated sale or transaction); Fillippo v. S. … Ross v. Burgan, 163 Ohio St. 211 , 126 N.E.2d 592 (1955); Haluka v. Baker, 66 Ohio App. 308 , 34 N.E.2d 68 (1941).

Grove v. Ohio State University, College of Veterinary Medicine

424 F. Supp. 377 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 16, 1976

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, supra; cf. Ashbacker Radio Co. v. F.C.C., 326 U.S. 327 , 66 S.Ct. 148 , 90 L.Ed. 108 (1945). … See Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, supra; Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Tyler v.

Curry v. United States Postal Service

583 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 26, 1984

See, e.g., Wilkins v. Walters, 571 F.Supp. 474 (N.D.Ohio 1983) (Veterans Administration); Brown v. Brown, 528 F.Supp. 686 (D.N.J.1981) (Department of Defense); 2 A. Larson & L. … Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. at 833 , 96 S.Ct. at 1968 .

Longmire v. Upjohn Co.

686 F. Supp. 659 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 24, 1988

(Board of Inquiry Report at p. 172, Exh. C). (doc. 29 at p. 3). Plaintiff relies upon Harper v. Eli Lilly & Co., 575 F.Supp. 1359 (N.D.Ohio 1983). However, we think the facts in Harper are distinguishable. … Viock v. Stowe Woodward Co., 13 Ohio App.3d 7 , 467 N.E.2d 1378 (1983), citing O’Stricker.

Martin v. W.E. Monks & Co.

805 F. Supp. 500 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 3, 1992

See also Falk v. … The defendants rely upon Fire Fighters Local 2141 v.

Payne v. A.O. Smith Corp.

627 F. Supp. 226 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 27, 1985

See United States v. Zipkin, 729 F.2d 384, 386 (6th Cir.1984); Stolen v. Penn Central Transportation Co., 583 F.2d 896 (6th Cir.1978). Thus, Mr. … product safety experience and successful completion of examination by a board of examiners.

Board of Trustees of the Southern Ohio Painters Health & Welfare Fund v. Sixth Region Remodeling, LLC, et al.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 12, 2026

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON BOARD OF TRUSTEES … See Grover by Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co., 33 F.3d 716, 718 (6th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and TERMINATED on the docket.

Burrows v. Ohio High School Athletic Ass'n

712 F. Supp. 620 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 1, 1988

Board of Directors of Rotary Int’l v. Rotary Club of Duarte, 481 U.S. 537 , 107 S.Ct. 1940, 1945 , 95 L.Ed.2d 474 (1987). … See Board of Directors of Rotary Int’l v. Rotary Club of Duarte, 481 U.S. 537 , 107 S.Ct. 1940 , 95 L.Ed.2d 474 (1987); Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 , 104 S.Ct. 3244 , 82 L.Ed.2d 462 (1984).

Columbus Ry., Power & Light Co. v. City of Columbus

253 F. 499 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 20, 1918

Ed. 960 ; Krell v. Henry, [1903] 2 K. B. 740; Metropolitan Water Board v. Dick, Kerr & Co., Appeal Cases, H. of L. 119, [1917] 2 K. B. 1; Liston et al. v. Owners of Steamship Carpathian, [1915] 2 K. … In Metropolitan Water Board v.

In re Rieger, Kapner & Altmark

157 F. 609 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 4, 1907

In Bank v. Trebein Co., 59 Ohio St. 316 , 52 N. … Bank v. Trebein Co., 59 Ohio St. 316 -325, 52 N. E. 834 .

STE. MARIE v. City of Dayton

162 F. Supp. 2d 766 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 21, 2000

See also Boretti v. … The judgment of such Board shall be final.” III.

Greene v. Brigano

904 F. Supp. 675 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 10, 1995

Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963) (extending the indigent defendant’s right to transcripts to state post-conviction proceedings). … Anders v.

Gillispie v. Miami Township

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 3, 2022

P. 24(b)(3); see also Buck v. … Id. at 807 (citing Brown v. Ferro Corp., 763 F.2d 798, 801 (6th Cir. 1985)).

Schmidt v. Overland Xpress, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 28, 2021

Humana controlled the decision to deny Schmidt’s claims for medical benefits under the Plan, so the Browns cannot be liable under § 1132(a)(1)(B). See Daniel v. … See, e.g., Peters v. Lincoln Elec.

Wright v. City of Cincinnati

450 F. Supp. 2d 831 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 10, 2006

Like Weaver, the first step in the process herein, the meeting with the Executive Board, uses union officials, members of the Board, to resolve the matter. … See Reese v.

Whitt v. Casto

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 18, 2021

App’x 975, 976-77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). II. … Brown v. Partin, No. 1:20-CV-235, 2020 WL 5077037, at *3 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 27, 2020). For these reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Vance v. Department of Veterans Affairs

886 F. Supp. 2d 771 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 18, 2012

See Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Taylor v. United States, 21 Fed.Appx. 264, 265 (6th Cir. 2011). … Brown, 425 U.S. at 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 ; Haithcock v. Frank, 958 F.2d 671, 675 (6th *775 Cir.1992). Plaintiff raised only one claim — racial discrimination — before the EEOC. 8 See doc. 2-2.

Pough v. DeWine

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 25, 2024

July 28, 2022) (the Ohio Parole Board’s “knowing reliance on false information in a parolee’s file, which is prohibited under state law, can constitute a due process violation.” (citing State ex rel. Keith v. … In Brown v. Cool, No. 2:21-cv-5146, 2023 WL 10511455, at *2 (S.D.