Opinion

Opinion

Court
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF

THE SOUTHERN OHIO PAINTERS

HEALTH & WELFARE FUND,

Plaintiff, Case No. 3:21-cv-300

vs.

SIXTH REGION District Judge Michael J. Newman

REMODELING, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED, VOLUNTARY MOTION TO

DISMISS THIS CASE WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. No. 64); (2) DISMISSING THIS CASE

WITH PREJUDICE; AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET

______________________________________________________________________________

This case is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s unopposed, voluntary motion to dismiss this

case with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Doc. No. 64. For good cause shown, and

in the absence of opposition, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss. See Grover by

Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co., 33 F.3d 716, 718 (6th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE and TERMINATED on the docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 12, 2026 s/Michael J. Newman

Hon. Michael J. Newman

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.