Case law

Crable v. City of Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 16, 2024

(citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). It does not exempt Crable from “basic pleading standards.” Johnson v. E. Tawas Hous. Comm’n, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 33270 at *1 (6th Cir. … V.

Aragonite Capital Markets, LLC v. Dark Horse Media, LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 2, 2022

Hanson He, who is identified as “Board Member and CEO.” However, Mr. … For example, in Browning v. University of Findlay, 2019 WL 582351 (N.D.

Browning v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 21, 2025

Plaintiff James Dean Browning (“Plaintiff” or “Browning”) timely filed an objection (Doc. 14), and Defendant responded (Doc. 15). … See Mokbel-Aljahmi v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 732 F. App’x 395, 401 (6th Cir. 2018); Shepard v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 705 F. App’x 435, 442-43 (6th Cir. 2017); Rudd v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 531 F.

Jiang Lu v. U.S. ICE

22 F. Supp. 3d 839 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 19, 2014

In Demore v. … He does not allege whether he appealed that decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals.

American States Ins. v. Hannan Constr. Co.

283 F. Supp. 988 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 6, 1966

Brown to call the fire department * * *.” … In Foley v.

Calatrello v. United Food & Commercial Workers, Local Union 880

726 F. Supp. 1102 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 27, 1988

Smitley v. N.L.R.B., 327 F.2d 351, 354-55 (9th *1105 Cir.1964); Baldovin v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, 570 F.Supp. 1314 (S.D.Tex.1983). … N.L.R.B. v. Local 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 317 F.2d 193, 198 (2d Cir.1963).

District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n v. Adams

447 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 18, 1977

In Warth v. … Paul Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 288-89 , 58 S.Ct. 586 , 82 L.Ed. 845 (1938), followed in Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v.

North Olmsted Chamber of Commerce v. City of North Olmsted

108 F. Supp. 2d 792 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 26, 2000

See GenCorp, Inc. v. … In Nightclubs, Inc. v.

Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. United Technologies Corp.

435 F. Supp. 1249 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 15, 1977

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. at 1523-24 (footnote omitted). … As recognized by the Supreme Court in Brown Shoe Co. v.

Jones v. Wittenberg

323 F. Supp. 93 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 17, 1971

Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483 , 89 S.Ct. 747 , 21 L.Ed.2d 718 (1969); Vida v. Cage, 385 F.2d 408 (6th Cir. 1967) ; Glenn v. Ciccone, 370 F.2d 361 (8th Cir. 1966). … Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Wright v. McMann, 387 F.2d 519 (2d Cir. 1967). Thus it does not appear that this is a case for abstention.

United States v. Charter

227 F. 331 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 26, 1915

We therefore approve the general view of the law expressed by Judge Neterer in United States v. Brown, 224 Fed. 135 , in Western district of Washington.

Wiggins v. Chrysler Corp.

728 F. Supp. 463 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 22, 1989

This grievance may be appealed to the Appeal Board. … In Monroe v.

Besuner v. Faberge, Incorporated

379 F. Supp. 278 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 7, 1974

GREEN, District Judge: This action is brought as an appeal from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent Office, denying to plaintiff registration of the trademark “Fabrece”. … See, Barr Rubber Products Co. v. Burlington Mills, Inc., 113 U.S.App.D.C. 108 , 306 F.2d 268 (1962); Colgate-Palmolive Company v. North American Chemical Corp., 238 F.

Reams v. Local 18, International Union of Operating Engineers

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 5, 2021

Robinson v. … The purpose of the Garmon rule, thus, is to ensure that disputes within the Board's expertise are first committed to it. Brown, supra, 104 S.Ct. at 3186. See also, Jones v.

Pittman v. Cuyahoga Valley Career Center

451 F. Supp. 2d 905 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 2006

Pittman’s suspension was upheld by the Board of Education. … In Garcetti v.

Speers v. University of Akron

189 F. Supp. 2d 759 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 6, 2002

Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); see also Meyers v. City of Cincinnati, 934 F.2d 726, 729 (6th Cir.1991). … Brown, 544 F.2d 279, 283 (6th Cir.1976) (transfer and recorded reprimand did not deprive appellant of a "property” interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment). 3 .

Legkodymov

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 15, 2026

Id. at 507 (quoting Zicherman v. Korean Air Lines Co., 516 U.S. 217, 226 (1996)). Magistrate Judge Brown considered and rejected Mr. … The strong weight of authority supports Magistrate Judge Brown’s conclusion. In Rana v.

Springston v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

863 F. Supp. 535 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 5, 1994

Moncol v. Board of Educ., 55 Ohio State 2d 72, 9 O.O.3d 75 , 378 N.E.2d 155 (1978). Conrail argues that its duty with respect to the locomotive was to meet the safety standards established by the FRA in the BIA. … Brown v. Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co., 108 F.Supp. 164 (N.D.Iowa 1952) (citation Omitted).

Jones

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 4, 2025

(ECF No. 14, PageID #1387) (quoting ECF No. 11, PageID #1370) (quoting Brown v. Bobby, 656 F.3d 325, 337 (6th Cir. 2011)). Petitioner claims that litigants are presumed prejudiced when denied 1 Barker v. … The state court, in short, reasonably applied Barker in Brown's case. Brown, 656 F.3d at 337-38.

LaCortiglia v. Aluminum Co. of America

976 F. Supp. 707 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 25, 1997

Black v. Ryder/P.I.E. Nationwide, Inc., 15 F.3d 573, 584 (6th Cir.1994). In Air Line Pilots Association, Int’l v. … Koeppen thoroughly presented Plaintiffs case to the Arbitration Board. First, Mr.