Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohnd

4,048 results

1.69s

  • United States v. Miller

    448 F. Supp. 2d 860 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 2006

    McNally accepted prior to boarding the M/V Stardancer contained a contractual, one-year time limitation for filing certain types of actions, including Petitioner’s sur-vivorship claim, and that the provision applies here. … The Government claims the McNallys were given tickets when they boarded the M/V Stardancer that contained such a one-year limitation clause, that the clause is enforceable here, and that the McNallys filed their claim after

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoyt v. Thermalcup, Inc.

    160 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 2, 1958

    Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equip. … Justice Bradley in Atlantic Works v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reeves v. Digital Equipment Corp.

    710 F. Supp. 675 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 19, 1989

    Cooper v. City of North Olmsted, 795 F.2d 1265 (6th Cir.1986). … Brown v. ASD Computing Center, 519 F.Supp. 1096 (S.D.Ohio 1981). Plaintiff received a written warning on February 7, 1986 and was then dismissed on March 3, 1986.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Costantino v. TRW, INC.

    773 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 23, 1991

    comments in writing; or (d) appear before the Board. … See United States Railroad Retirement Board v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bryenton v. Preyer

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 15, 2023

    Co. v. MRF Ltd., 181 F.3d 759, 763 (6th Cir. 1999). The parties agree that Brown Advisory is nondiverse. … For this reason alone, Brown Advisory does not qualify as a necessary party under Rule 19(a)(1)(B). See Century Bus. Servs. v. Bryant, 69 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States Ex Rel. Vitoratos v. Campbell

    410 F. Supp. 1208 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 16, 1976

    Arnold v. U. S. Board of Parole, 390 F.Supp. 1177 (D.C.D.C.1975). It is this filing which invokes the above due process safeguards. … Morrissey, supra; Hickman v. Arkansas Parole Board, 361 F.Supp. 864 (D.C.Ark.1973). In this case, cross-examination of Mr. Crew was not relevant to the evidentiary issue before the parole authority.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • May

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 1, 2025

    Pilgrim v. Littlefield, 92 F.3d 413, 416 (6th Cir. 1996). Liberal construction does not “abrogate basic pleading essentials in pro se suits.” Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Farmer v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gfell v. Rickelman

    313 F. Supp. 364 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 28, 1970

    Wheeler County Board of Education, 306 F.Supp. 97 (S.D.Ga. Nov. 17 1969); Leonard v. … As expressed by Judge Lawrence in the case of Stevenson v. Wheeler County Board of Education, supra: “Among the things a student is supposed to learn at school (at least, such is my idea) is a sense of discipline.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Goudy v. Tuscarawas County, Ohio

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 23, 2022

    Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962); see also Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 436, 442-43 (6th Cir, 2016). Under Rule 15(a), the court has discretion in allowing amendments. Robinson v. Mich. Consol. … See Hetep v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Decker v. Spicer Mfg. Div. of Dana Corp.

    101 F. Supp. 207 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 26, 1951

    In the case of Ford, Appellant v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee, 145 Oh St, 1, at *516 pages 3, 4 and 5, 30 O. O. 236, 60 N. E. 2d 471, 472 , we find the following: “The syllabus in Industrial Commission v. … State of New Jersey v. Weinberger et al., D. C., 38 F. 2d 298 , and Snook v. Industdial Commission of Illinois et al., D. C., 9 F. Supp. 26 , have been helpful to the court. An order is drawn accordingly.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Rosania v. Taco Bell of America, Inc.

    303 F. Supp. 2d 878 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 23, 2004

    Co. v. … Hence, we conclude that if a state plaintiff is able to present the Board with evidence that his lawsuit raises genuine issues of material fact, the Board should proceed no further with the § 8(a)(1)— § 8(a)(4) unfair labor

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • United States v. Blank

    251 F. Supp. 166 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 4, 1966

    United States v. … Brown, 68 Ohio App. 335, 340 , 37 N.E.2d 434, 436 (1941) : The police officer testified that Irby stated to him in the presence of Brown, “The door was not locked, he had opened the door and proceeded to the second floor.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Clarence M. Moore and Laura P. Moore Trust v. Hiram Township

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 31, 2020

    Brown v. Dayton, 730 N.E.2d 958, 962 (Ohio 2000). … Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Alan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 30, 2025

    McSurely v. Hutchison, 823 F.2d 1002, 1005 (6th Cir. 1987). In Ohio, the two-year statute of limitations for personal injury found in Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.10 governs. See Browning v. … Jones v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cooper

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 30, 2026

    Brown v. Berghuis, 638 F. Supp. 2d 795, 812-13 (E.D. Mich. 2009). … Brown v. Berghuis, 638 F. Supp. 2d at 812-13 (citation omitted). See also Machacek v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • North Olmsted Chamber of Commerce v. City of North Olmsted

    108 F. Supp. 2d 792 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 26, 2000

    See GenCorp, Inc. v. … In Nightclubs, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Crable v. City of Cleveland

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 16, 2024

    (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). It does not exempt Crable from “basic pleading standards.” Johnson v. E. Tawas Hous. Comm’n, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 33270 at *1 (6th Cir. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Aragonite Capital Markets, LLC v. Dark Horse Media, LLC

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 2, 2022

    Hanson He, who is identified as “Board Member and CEO.” However, Mr. … For example, in Browning v. University of Findlay, 2019 WL 582351 (N.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Browning v. Social Security Administration

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 21, 2025

    Plaintiff James Dean Browning (“Plaintiff” or “Browning”) timely filed an objection (Doc. 14), and Defendant responded (Doc. 15). … See Mokbel-Aljahmi v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 732 F. App’x 395, 401 (6th Cir. 2018); Shepard v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 705 F. App’x 435, 442-43 (6th Cir. 2017); Rudd v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 531 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jiang Lu v. U.S. ICE

    22 F. Supp. 3d 839 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 19, 2014

    In Demore v. … He does not allege whether he appealed that decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.