Case law

Melling v. Gordon Form Lathe Co.

14 F.2d 437 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 26, 1926

If Hill v. Wooster, 132 U. S. 693 , 10 S. Ct. 228 , 33 L. Ed. 502 , has the force and effect now contended, it was their duty to have done so. … In the second place, I do not wish to go on record as holding that Hill v.

Kimble v. WASYLYSHYN

687 F. Supp. 2d 703 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 23, 2009

Plaintiff names as Defendants Sheriff Mark Wasylyshyn, the Board of Wood County Commissioners, and individual Commissioners Jim Carter, Tim Brown, and Alvin Perkins. Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. … Hollins v. Atlantic Co., 188 F.3d 652, 658 (6th Cir.1999); Little Forest Med. Ctr. of Akron v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm’n, 61 Ohio St.3d 607, 609 , 575 N.E.2d 1164 (1991).

Sullivan v. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young U.S.

518 F. Supp. 2d 983 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 11, 2007

Heating & Plumbing Co., Inc. v. … Nicklin v. Henderson, 352 F.3d 1077, 1080 (6th Cir.2003) (citing Adams v. Philip Morris, Inc., 67 F.3d 580, 583 (6th Cir. 1995))(But see Astor v. Int’l Bus.

Maharg, Inc. v. Van Wert Solid Waste Management District

60 F. Supp. 2d 750 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 6, 1999

Scheid v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc., 859 F.2d 434, 436 (6th Cir.1988). … The board of county commissioners in court is subject to suit in court. O.R.C. § 305.12.

Local 17 International Ass'n v. Mooney Welding, Inc.

993 F. Supp. 615 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 4, 1997

U.S. v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 , 82 S.Ct. 993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962); see also U.S. v. Hodges X-Ray, Inc., 759 F.2d 557, 562 (6th Cir. 1985). … See Blodgett v. Blodgett, 49 Ohio St.3d 243 , 551 N.E.2d 1249 (1990); Massi v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Mutual of Ohio, 765 F.Supp. 904, 909 (N.D.Ohio 1991).

Carmichael v. City of Cleveland

881 F. Supp. 2d 833 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 1, 2012

Defendant Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners Defendant Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners claims entitlement to dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) due to the protection of political subdivision immunity established in … The parties do not dispute that Cuyahoga County and the Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners fall within the definition of “political subdivision” set out in Chapter 2744. R.C. § 2744.01(F); Maddox v. E.

Board of Trustees of the Toledo Area Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan v. Karpathia Funding Group, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 5, 2023

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) Board … While I am to construe pro se pleadings liberally, Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007), a pro se plaintiff still must follow basic pleading standards. Martin v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Patrick Henry Education Ass'n

741 F. Supp. 670 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 13, 1990

Philbrook v. Ansonia Board of Education, 757 F.2d 476 (2nd Cir.1985). … Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook, 479 U.S. 60, 67, 69, 70 , 107 S.Ct. 367, 371, 372, 373 , 93 L.Ed.2d 305 .

Hockett v. Administrator of Veterans Affairs

385 F. Supp. 1106 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 1, 1974

S. v. … See, e. g., Earls v.

Slick

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 4, 2026

Mgmt., LLC v. … . § 1367(c), the Governing Board’s Motion to Dismiss is granted on Claim II as to the Governing Board. V.

Conway v. International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers

209 F. Supp. 2d 731 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 12, 2002

Perry v. Int’l Longshoremen’s Assoc., 638 F.Supp. 1441, 1448 (S.D.N.Y.1986). “Evidence of a partial board is violative of the LMRDA.” Mayle v. Laborer’s Int’l Union of N. Am. … Stein v.

United States v. Yee

129 F.R.D. 629 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 14, 1990

Brown, 557 F.2d 541, 556 (6th Cir.1977) (hair comparisons by ion microprobic analysis inadmissible); United States v. Stifel, 433 F.2d 431, 441 (6th Cir.1970) (neutron activation analysis admissible). … In United States v.

United States ex rel. Lombardo v. Bramblett

114 F. Supp. 183 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 5, 1953

The Assistant Commissioner of Immigration adopted the recommendation of the hearing officer and the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed the relator’s appeal. … Di Dente v.

Iron Workers Local Union No. 17 Insurance Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.

23 F. Supp. 2d 771 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 21, 1998

Thus, the Amended Complaint alleges that in 1962, Sir Charles Ellis, a science advisor to the board of the parent of Brown & Williamson stated that "smoking is a habit of addiction” and that "nicotine is not only a very fine … Plaintiffs also allege that the general counsel of Brown & Williamson, wrote in 1963: "Moreover, nicotine is addictive.

Connone v. Transport Desgagnes, Inc.

976 F. Supp. 1111 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 13, 1997

Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans, 333 F.Supp. 353 (E.D.La.1971) (Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans not permitted to invoke the defense of sovereign immunity to defend against maritime tort claims) … Principe Compañía Naviera, S.A. v. Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans, 333 F.Supp. 353, 354 (E.D.La.1971); Metropolitan R. Co. v. District of Columbia, 132 U.S. 1 , 10 S.Ct. 19 , 33 L.Ed. 231 (1889).

United States v. Payner

434 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 28, 1977

See, e. g., Elkins v. United States, supra, 364 U.S., at 222 , 80 S.Ct. 1437 ; Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 659 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961); Brown v. … See also, Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 485 , 92 S.Ct. 619 , 30 L.Ed.2d 618 (1972); Brown v.

Tolbert v. Ohio Department of Transportation

992 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 6, 1998

Palmer v. Board of Educ., 46 F.3d 682 (7th Cir.1995), addressed an allegedly discriminatory school closing plan. … Corp it upheld a zoning board decision that tended to perpetuate racially segregated housing patterns; and in Personnel Adm’r v.

Matthews v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 21, 2023

Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 974 (6th Cir. 1997) (interpreting 38 U.S.C. § 511). The Veterans Judicial Review Act provides a separate, multi-tiered system for reviewing benefits decisions. … Neither the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (an board within an administrative agency) nor the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (an Article I court) fall within that definition. Jackson v. United States, 80 Fed.

Dobrski v. Ford Motor Company

698 F. Supp. 2d 966 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 16, 2010

Hammontree v. National Labor Relations Board, 925 F.2d 1486 , 1490 n. 7 (D.C.Cir.1991). … Brown v.

City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.

538 F. Supp. 1280 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 13, 1980

San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board, 542 F.2d 1076, 1085-1086 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); DeLoach v. Woodley, 405 F.2d 496 (5th Cir. 1968). … Foman v. Davis, supra at 182 , 83 S.Ct. at 230 .