Case law

Ray

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 23, 2026

Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 447, 462 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)). … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). “This means that the plaintiff must show a direct causal link between the policy and the alleged constitutional violation . . . .” Bickerstaff v.

United States v. Petrelli

704 F. Supp. 122 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 30, 1986

See Trailer Train Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 697 F.2d 860, 869 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 846 , 104 S.Ct. 149 , 78 L.Ed.2d 139 (citing Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Co. v. … Donovan v. Brown Equipment & Service Tools, Inc., 666 F.2d 148, 157 (5th Cir.1982) (citations omitted).

The Senator

21 F. 191 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 4, 1876

master of the vessel to unload the cargo, and the contract being one within the scope of his authority as such master, it would seem that the service would come within the rule referred to by Judge Emmons in The Williams, (1 Brown … Rep. 119; and Hubbard v. Roach, 2 Fed. Rep. 394.—[Ed.

Mickowski v. Visi-Trak Worldwide, LLC

321 F. Supp. 2d 885 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 7, 2004

on lands it leased to an agricultural chemical company, Brown & Bryant. 41 Brown & Bryant, when faced with the impossibility of paying for cleanup costs, sold its assets to PureGro. 42 Atchison then sought recovery for the … Brown & Bryant, Inc., 159 F.3d 358 (9th Cir.1997), amending and replacing Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., et. al. v.

Falls Stamping & Welding Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America

485 F. Supp. 1097 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 27, 1979

N.L.R.B. v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (8th Cir. 1963). The record contains sufficient evidence of actual interim earnings, e. g. I.R.S. … In that task, Labor Board practice is a useful guide. 14 . Under Albemarle Paper Co. v.

Northeastern Educational Television of Ohio, Inc. v. Educational Television Assoc. of Metropolitan Cleveland

758 F. Supp. 1568 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 28, 1990

Referring to the often cited language from Brown Shoe Co. v. … Wilson Industries, Inc., 794 F.2d at 1363 (citing Brown Shoe Co., supra.) (emphasis in original).

Ziegler v. Findlay Industries, Inc.

464 F. Supp. 2d 733 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 30, 2006

Wagenheim v. … Rather, Plaintiff was terminated because he was not communicating with other officers and the Board and failed to follow Board instructions (Fahl Dep. 43; M. Gardner Dep. 70).

Hamilton v. Cuyahoga County Welfare Dept.

613 F. Supp. 170 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 3, 1985

Metropolitan County Board of Education, 755 F.2d 67 (6th Cir.1985) * . Reconciling its decision in Northcross v. … In Webb v.

Robinson v. UAW LOCAL 1196

877 F. Supp. 405 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 31, 1995

The Union’s Public Review Board can award money damages for a breach of the duty of fair representation. See Fuffe v. … Therefore, the relief available from the Public Review Board would have been complete as against the Union, and “is sufficient to require exhaustion.” Rogers v.

City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.

538 F. Supp. 1240 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 18, 1981

United States v. Brown, 540 F.2d 364, 377-78 (8th Cir. 1976). Accord: United States v. Gullion, 575 F.2d 26, 28 (1st Cir. 1978). As stated by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. … United States v. Brown, supra.

United States v. King

382 F. Supp. 3d 702 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 27, 2019

United States v. Buchanan , 904 F.2d 349 , 356 (6th Cir.1990) (citation omitted). Id. at 355 (quoting Brown v. Illinois , 422 U.S. 590 , 599, 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) ) (emphasis omitted). United States v. … Lopez-Arias , 344 F.3d at 630 (citing Kaupp v. Texas , 538 U.S. 626 , 631, 123 S.Ct. 1843 , 155 L.Ed.2d 814 (2003) ; Brown , 422 U.S. at 603 -04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 ).

Swigart

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 10, 2025

a legally distinct entity from the County and the Board of Commissioners.” … Id.; Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 436, 442-43 (6th Cir. 2016) (“[T]he rule embodies a ‘liberal amendment policy.’”) (quoting Morse v. McWhorter, 290 F.3d 795, 800 (6th Cir. 2002)).

Duggan v. Orthopaedic Institute of Ohio, Inc.

365 F. Supp. 2d 853 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 18, 2005

[a] Court does not sit as a *862 ‘super-personnel’ board of review to second guess or re-examine an employer’s nondiscriminatory business decisions.” Seay v. Tenn. … See Leigh v.

Stevenson v. Owens State Community College

562 F. Supp. 2d 965 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 25, 2008

Id. at 638-40, 107 S.Ct. at 3038-39 ; Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727, 2738 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982); Birrell v. Brown, 867 F.2d 956, 958 (6th Cir.1989). … Adams v.

Seneca County Board of Health v. WIN Waste Innovations of Seneca County LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 12, 2026

Scadden v. Willhite, 2002 WL 452472, at *9 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002); Ackerman v. Tri-City Geriatric & Health Care, Inc., 55 Ohio St. 2d 51, 56 (1978). … Williams v. Skinner, 1979 WL 208823, at *1–2 (Ohio Ct. App. 1979). Here, the Board seeks prospective relief only, not civil penalties or damages.

Child Evangelism Fellowship of Ohio, Inc. v. Cleveland Metropolitan School District

998 F. Supp. 2d 605 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 10, 2014

Next, Plaintiff attempted to have the Board reconsider the waiver, but after making an in-person request the Board denied Plaintiff again. (Cmplt. ¶ 44). … Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 64 , 117 S.Ct. 1055 , 137 L.Ed.2d 170 (1997), citing Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. Contractors of America v.

Wolverton v. Lacey

30 F. Cas. 417 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 15, 1856

Thacirarey v. The Farmer of Salem [Case No. 13.852]; Conk. Adm. 72; Fland. Mar. Law. 354, 355. … Since the decision in the case of The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh, 12 How. [53 U.

Burkholder v. International Union, United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local No. 12

700 F. Supp. 2d 895 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 19, 2010

Between 2000 and 2003 Jerry Brown, a International staff representative, visited Toledo three times. Part of Brown’s job for the International was to help resolve disputes about work assignments. … Two of Brown’s visits related to lines of demarcation. During both visits, Brown only looked at things UAW representatives told him were in dispute.

Aaron v. Bob Evans Restaurant

477 F. Supp. 2d 853 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 16, 2007

Brown v. Francis, 75 F.3d 860, 864-65 (3d Cir.1996). … Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149-50 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984).

Acme, Palmers & De Mooy Foundry Co. v. Weiss

21 F.2d 492 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 31, 1927

As modified by the Board of Tax Appeals, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue computed and determined a net taxable profit on this áale *493 in the sum of $25,180.61. … of Tax Appeals Reports, page 1128; Red Wing Malting Co. v.