Case law

Durabilt Steel Locker Co. v. Berger Mfg. Co.

21 F.2d 139 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 1, 1927

The reasoning of District Judge Brown accords with my own and is adopted, and will be adhered to until there is an authoritative construction to the contrary. … I agree with District Judge Brown that this exact point was not presented in American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co., and, like him, I am unable to concur in the reasoning of the opinion in the Wire Wheel Corp’n Case.

Miller v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

727 F. Supp. 365 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 9, 1989

Miller v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co., 834 F.2d 556, 560 (6th Cir.1987). … Accordingly, this action is terminated and these matters should properly be raised before the Public Law Board. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Kareem

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 3, 2026

Silberberg v. … Co. v.

Cobra Pipeline Co. v. Gas Natural, Inc.

132 F. Supp. 3d 945 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 17, 2015

Snow v. … Jasar Recycling Inc. v. Major Max Mgmt. Corp., 8-cv-2830, 2010 WL 395212 (N.D.Ohio Jan. 22, 2010) (emphasis added); see also Simpkins v.

Thomas

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 23, 2026

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On October 9, 2025, Plaintiff Tiffany Thomas filed a four-count complaint against the Beachwood City School District Board of Education alleging claims concerning the Board’s institution of a … Because the Court ultimately recommends granting the Board’s motion and has determined that Thomas’s motion should be denied, the Court has determined that the best course is to address the Board’s motion

In re Brown

85 Ohio Law. Abs. 463 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 8, 1960

Rodejlciet v. Andrews, 74 Ohio St., 104 , followed and approved in Public Finance Co. v. Rowe, 123 Ohio St., 206 . … May v. Henderson, 268 U. S., 111 - 45 S. Ct. 5 A. B. R. (N. S.), 739. * The case of May v.

Pasqualetti v. Kia Motors America, Inc.

663 F. Supp. 2d 586 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 30, 2009

Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board, 2001 WL 300641 , 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 1455 (Ohio Ct.App., Franklin County Mar. 29, 2001) (“Chrysler I ”) (part of the Bowshier controversy) and Ganley v. … .”); accord Board of Trustees of the Worthington Pub. Library v. Hickson Corp., No. C2-98-1073, 1999 WL 1455661 , at *1, 1999 U.S. Dist.

Schmersal v. Major

753 F. Supp. 2d 691 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 30, 2010

Board’s guidelines (Doc. … In Jackson v.

Baker v. BP America, Inc.

768 F. Supp. 208 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 24, 1991

E.g., Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. … Brown, 876 F.2d 1526, 1529 (11th Cir.1989); Kennedy v. Josephthal & Co., Inc., 814 F.2d 798, 804-05 (1st Cir.1987).

Kuhne v. Killian

30 F. Supp. 423 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 6, 1939

Robertson had not been given proper credence and consideration by the Examiner and the Board of Appeals. … As the Court of Appeals of the Sixth Circuit said in the case of Cleveland Trust Company v.

Gaiter

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 10, 2026

The Cleveland Heights–University Heights Board of Education denied Ms. Gaiter’s request. (Id., ¶ 13.) Plaintiff does not plead the date of the Board’s denial. The Board charged Ms. … v.

National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People-Special Contribution Fund v. Jones

740 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 19, 1990

Barr PORTER, WRIGHT, MORRIS & ARTHUR Kathleen McDonald O’Malley, BROWN, CUMMINS & BROWN Robert S Brown, Attorneys for Defendant Nathaniel R. Jones SIDLEY & AUSTIN By: (s) George L. Saunders, Jr. George L. … Brown, 175 Ohio St. 149 , 192 N.E.2d 54 (1963); and State v. Brown, 173 Ohio St. 114 , 180 N.E.2d 157 (1962); In re Incorporated Consultants (Klivens), 6 Ohio Misc. 143 , 216 N.E.2d 912 (C.P., Cuy., 1965).

In Re Cartellone

148 F. Supp. 676 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 7, 1957

Chartrand v. Karnuth [D.C.], 31 F.Supp. 799 ; Schoeps v. Carmichael [9 Cir.], 177 F.2d 391, 397 . … Lindenau v.

Mercereau v. M/V WOODBINE

551 F. Supp. 811 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 3, 1982

Advance Welding Co., Inc. v. M/V Corra D, et al., 299 F.Supp. 736 (E.D. La.1969). … See also M/V Marifax v. McCrory, 391 F.2d 909 (5th Cir.1968). The M/V Woodbine is not a dead ship, and a valid lien placed upon her is enforceable.

Henegar v. Banta

817 F. Supp. 668 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 1, 1993

A party who has litigated an issue before the Adjustment Board on the merits may not relitigate that issue in an independent judicial proceeding. Union Pacific R. Co. v. … He is limited to the judicial review of the Board’s proceedings that the Act itself provides. Gunther v. San Diego & A.E.R. Co., 382 U.S. 257 [ 86 S.Ct. 368 , 15 L.Ed.2d 308 ] (1965).

Lewis v. Whirlpool Corp.

650 F. Supp. 2d 723 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 2, 2009

USF Red Star, Inc. v. … .”); Gerry’s Cash Markets, Inc. v.

Flynn v. Flynn

560 F. Supp. 922 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 21, 1983

For his definition of “willfully” the defendant relies upon Beard v. … Brown, Sweeney, and Clifford F. Brown, dissenting in Bonkowsky and concurring in the syllabus and judgment only in Prem , stated their belief that the doctrine should be abrogated in every instance.

Voltz v. Erie County

25 F. Supp. 3d 1046 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 11, 2014

Schoonmaker v. Spartan Graphics Leasing, LLC, 595 F.3d 261, 269 (6th Cir.2010) (citing Cicero v. Borg-Warner Auto., Inc., 280 F.3d 579 , 592 (6th Cir.2002)). … Buhrmaster v. Overnite Transp. Co., 61 F.3d 461, 464 (6th Cir.1995). The Board made the decision to hire Plaintiff after recommendation from the hiring committee a mere month before his termination.

Craig v. Engle

613 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 3, 1985

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , *785 164 n. 4, 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 2224 n. 4, 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); Waller v. Florida, 397 U.S. 387 , 90 S.Ct. 1184 , 25 L.Ed.2d 435 (1970). … The Supreme Court has recognized that the doctrine of collateral estoppel is not to be applied across the board to bar subsequent criminal prosecutions. See e.g., Standefer v.

Thomas

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 4, 2026

DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, __) Defendant.. This matter comes before the Court upon the Report.and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J ames A. Grimes, Jr. … See also, Thomas v.