Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohnd

4,048 results

1.14s

  • Deutsch v. Hoge

    94 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 15, 1949

    The rule applicable here is stated in the case of Blair v. U. S., 8. … Defendant, The Hoge Lumber Company is an Ohio corporation and by action of its board of directors has assumed the payment of any judgment which may be rendered in this action against the business known as The Hoge Brush Company

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Tomblin v. Local 496, Laborers' International Union

    20 F. Supp. 2d 1136 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 26, 1998

    See Steel Company v. … E.g., Dailey v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Starr v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 10, 2023

    MCI’s inmate disciplinary committee, the Rules Infraction Board (“RIB”), also concluded that Plaintiff violated prison rules. … Reedy v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Walker v. Cedar Fair. L.P.

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 24, 2024

    See Christianson v. Colt Indus. … Specifically, named plaintiffs Holly Poteat, Jonathan Brown, Mandi Stewart, Kelly Shepperson, and Noelani Mori, fall within the Consumer Protection Class definition.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Garrett v. Morgan County Sheriff's Office

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 10, 2024

    For example, in Matreale v. … See also Hoffman v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Frank v. Dana Corp.

    649 F. Supp. 2d 729 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 28, 2009

    Whether being shoved off the plank or jumping ship on his own, a CFO whose watch ended in a company’s foundering was hardly likely to remain on board. … Corp. v.

    Reversed by Frank v. Dana Corp., 646 F.3d 954 (2011)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ragozzine v. Youngstown State University

    2 F. Supp. 3d 1051 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 24, 2014

    Brohm v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-570 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Chapman v. Bracy

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 4, 2020

    V. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bryan v. Bobby

    114 F. Supp. 3d 467 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 16, 2015

    Uttecht v. Brown, 551 U.S. 1, 9 , 127 S.Ct. 2218 , 167 L.Ed.2d 1014 (2007). … State v. Brown (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 305, 317 , 528 N.E.2d 523 ; State v. Nields, 93 Ohio St.3d at 39, 752 N.E.2d 859 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ogletree v. Cleveland State University

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 20, 2022

    Kirilenko-Ison v. Board of Educ. of Danville Indep. Schs., 974 F.3d 652, 660 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)). … County v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Clifford v. Department of Youth Services Indian River Juvenile Correction Facility

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 3, 2025

    See Mangum v. Repp, 674 F. App’x 531, 537 (6th Cir. 2017); see also Thomas v. Haslam, 303 F. Supp. 3d 585, 624 (M.D. … See Viergutz v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 375 F. App’x 482, 485 (6th Cir. 2010); see also United States v. Brown, 7 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kirkland v. ODRC

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 19, 2023

    Apple v. Glenn, 183 F.3d 477, 479 (6th Cir. 1999); Hagans v. … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Doe v. St. Edward High School

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 11, 2022

    Namely, in Weaver v. … Supp. 3d at 874, 880-81; H.M. v. Board of Educ. of the Kings Local Sch. Dist., 117 F. Supp. 3d 992, 1016 (S.D. Ohio 2015); Mayo v. Federal Exp., 13- cv-1380, 2014 WL 2600302, at *2 (N.D. Ohio June 10, 2014).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Petre v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

    458 F. Supp. 2d 518 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 13, 2006

    Bailey v. Brown, 34 Ohio St.2d 62, 66 , 295 N.E.2d 672 (1973). One acts wantonly when there is a complete failure to exercise any care whatsoever. Matkovich, 69 Ohio St.2d at 212, 214 , 431 N.E.2d 652 . … See e.g., InterRoyal Corp. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Sallam v. Hansen

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 15, 2022

    Sallam’s third Form I-130 Petition was denied by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) and the denial was affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). … Aoraha v. Gonzales, 209 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cogswell v. Vienna Township, Ohio

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 8, 2023

    See United States v. Collins, 799 F.3d 554, 576 (6th Cir. 2015); U.S. Const. amend. VI; cf. State v. … Brown v. VHS of Michigan, Inc., 545 F. App'x 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fambrough v. City of East Cleveland, Ohio

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 14, 2023

    See id. at 284 (quoting Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 (1968)). Drawing on the Pickering balancing test, the Court in Mt. … See also Ball v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Block Communications, Inc. v. Moorgate Capital Partners, LLC

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 1, 2021

    ), Jodi Miehls (BCI’s Chief Financial Officer and a member of BCI’s Board of Directors), and Sara LaBudda (BCI’s Treasurer), as BCI’s principal contacts. … Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kowalok

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 24, 2026

    Seating, Inc. v. Toledo Tool & Die Co., Inc., 579 F. Supp. 2d 967, 971 (N.D. Ohio 2008) (quoting Nilavar v. Osborn, 711 N.E.2d 726, 732 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)); see Tocci v. Antioch Univ., 967 F. … Taylor Bldg., 2008-Ohio-938, at ¶ 46 (the arbitration clause was not unconscionable as it appeared in standard, rather than fine print and it was not hidden); see also McCaskey v. Sanford-Brown Coll., 8th Dist.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cobble v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 12, 2025

    Bowen v. Comm’r of Soc. … Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.