Case law

Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Rumsfeld

70 F.R.D. 595 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 3, 1976

Brown, Jr., an attorney. … Renegotiation Board, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 147 , 425 F.2d 578, 580, n. 5 (1970), rev’d. on other grounds 421 U.S. 168 , 95 S.Ct. 1491 , 44 L.Ed.2d 57 (1975); Sears, Roebuck and Co. v.

McDonald v. Medina City Board of Education

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 30, 2020

P. 25(a), citing Dietrich v. Burrows, 164 F.R.D. 220 (N.D. Ohio 1995). In Defendants’ Reply, Defendants attempt to distinguish that case from the instant matter by pointing out that in Dietrich v. … However, the case of Unicorn Tales, Inc. v.

Lee v. Ohio Educ. Ass'n

366 F. Supp. 3d 980 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 2019

Mar. 11, 2019) ; Cook v. Brown , No. 6:18-CV-01085-AA [ 364 F.Supp.3d 1184 , 1192-93], 2019 WL 982384 , at *7 (D. Or. Feb. 28, 2019) ; Danielson v. … Those actions included collecting fees under Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 , 97 S.Ct. 1782 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977), a Supreme Court decision that expressly permitted such actions.

Fela v. US, Merit Systems Protection Bd.

730 F. Supp. 779 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 8, 1989

In response, the Board argues that the U.S. Supreme Court decision of State of Oklahoma v. U.S. … The case of State of Ohio v.

Reed v. Rhodes

934 F. Supp. 1492 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 26, 1996

. -, 115 S.Ct. 2038 , 132 L.Ed.2d 63 (1995), the evolution of school desegregation law from Brown v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955) (Brown II); Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Jenkins v.

Wright v. Trumbull County Board of Commissioners

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 25, 2019

Ce/lotex Corp. v. … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587-88 (1986); Adickes v. SH. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 (1970). The United States Supreme Court, in deciding Anderson v.

Coleman v. Wirtz

745 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 10, 1990

Brandon v. Holt, supra. Therefore, the claims are analyzed as claims against the municipality, here, the Cleveland School Board. … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 592 (6th Cir.1989) (Merritt, C.J.).

Rayford Jr. v. Board of Lucas County Commissioners

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 28, 2025

Ohio) (removed Feb. 20, 2025); Rayford, 21, 2025); Rayford, Jr. v. Board of Lucas County Commissioners, No. 3:25-cv-00351-JRK (N.D. Ohio) (removed Feb. 21, 2025); Rayford, Jr. v. … Defendant further asserts Plaintiff has failed to plausibly allege any claim against the Lucas County Board of Commissioners.

Hill v. Aro Corporation

263 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 6, 1967

In Jones v. … In Hutchins v.

MacKo v. Byron

555 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 1, 1982

Board of Regents v. Tomiano, 446 U.S. 478 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980); Wright v. Tennessee, 628 F.2d 949 (C.A. 6, 1980); Warner v. Perrino, 585 F.2d 171 (C.A. 6, 1978). … Harrington v. Vandalia-Butler Board of Education, 649 F.2d 434 (C.A. 6, 1981); Cerner, supra.

Brown

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 10, 2026

Brown sought judicial review in this court. (Tr. 575–77; Brown v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., Case No. 1:23-cv-2261- BMB (N.D. Ohio)). … Kuhn v.

Benedict v. Seiberling

17 F.2d 841 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 5, 1927

Co. v. Brown & Yellow T. & T. … South Dakota v. North Carolina; Black & White T. & T. Co. v. Brown & Yellow T. & T.

CUYAHOGA CTY. ASS'N FOR RETARDED CHILD'N, ETC. v. Essex

411 F. Supp. 46 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 5, 1976

While the Supreme Court has spoken of education as "perhaps the most important function of state and local governments", Brown v. … Goss v. Lopez, supra ; Brown v. Board of Education, supra .

In Re Keithley Instruments, Inc., Derivative Litigation

599 F. Supp. 2d 908 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 20, 2009

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir.1953). However, within this framework, the court retains “liberal discretion” to strike filings as it deems appropriate. Nationwide Ins. … The board of directors has the primary authority to file a lawsuit on behalf of the corporation. Flarey v. Youngstown Osteopathic Hosp., 151 Ohio App.3d 92, 95 , 783 N.E.2d 582 (7th App. Dist.2002) (citing Wadsworth v.

Tufts v. United States Postal Service

431 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 14, 1976

This cause of action is precluded by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. … See, Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577-579 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593, 602-603 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Arnett v.

Akron Co. v. Fidelity General Insurance

250 F. Supp. 201 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 12, 1964

Co. v. … Petsel v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. (CA 8, 1953), 202 F. 2d 817, 820 .

Brown

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 1, 2026

specifically the toilet drain was backed up and the source bathroom had no flooring, rotted plywood, and rot on the framing of the ceiling below and there was approximately 20 square feet of old on the framing and shiplap boards … See, e.g., Adkins v.

Berger v. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n

775 F. Supp. 1096 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 19, 1991

See also Hefner v. Alexander, 779 F.2d 277 (5th Cir.1985); Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board v. Perl, 752 F.2d 352 (8th Cir.1985). … Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943).

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers Lodge No. 1194 v. Sargent Industries

63 F.R.D. 623 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 11, 1974

Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), in regard to racial desegregation. See, e. g., Newman v. … School Board of the City of Norfolk, Virginia, 456 F.2d 943, 954 (4th Cir. 1972); Clark v. Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, 369 F.2d 661 (8th Cir. 1966); Bell v.

Reed v. Rhodes

741 F. Supp. 1295 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 10, 1990

A rather simple, but fundamental, factual question in Reed v. Rhodes remains: Have the Defendants complied with the *1296 Court’s Remedial Orders? … See, e.g., Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 299-300 , 75 S.Ct. 753, 755-756 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); Columbus v.