Case law

General Electric Co. v. Burton

244 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 20, 1965

Isham, 84 U.S. 496 , 17 Wall. 496 , 21 L.Ed. 728 (1873); United States v. Brown Wood Preserving Co., 275 F.2d 525 (CA 6, 1960), and that so used they would not include the EL lamp. … See also White v. Winchester Country Club, 315 U.S. 32 , 62 S.Ct. 425 , 86 L.Ed. 619 (1942); Spangler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 278 F.2d 665 (CA 4, 1960); Acker v. United States, 258 F.2d 568 (CA 6, 1958).

Robinson v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.

724 F. Supp. 2d 840 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 21, 2010

Ctr., 2006 WL 5111117 , *1 (E.D.Tex.); Beam v. Nexion Health Mgmt., Inc., 2006 WL 2844907 , *2-3 (E.D.Tex.); Brown v. Brooks County Detention Ctr., 2005 WL 1515466 , *2 (S.D.Tex.); Nelson v. … In Chapman v.

Gentry v. the Renal Network

636 F. Supp. 2d 614 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 23, 2009

Frank v. … Plaintiff also alleges that the termination of her treatment was in violation of EMTALA. 1 In any event, the statute of *617 limitations applies across the board.

Wortham v. Integrated Health Services

302 F. Supp. 2d 854 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 13, 2004

Hedrick v. Western Reserve Care System, 355 F.3d 444 (6th Cir.2004) (citing Daniels v. Board of Educ. of Ravenna City Sch. Dist., 805 F.2d 203 , 209 (6th Cir.1986)). … Hale v.

Beitman v. Strater

262 F. 443 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 31, 1917

In Heekin v. Baker, 138 Fed. 63 , 70 C. C. A. 559 (8 C. C. … Ed. 154 , Webster Loom Co. v. Higgins, 105 U. S. 580 , 26 L. Ed. 1177 , Diamond Rubber Co. v. Consolidated Tire Co., 220 U. S. 428 , 31 Sup. Ct. 444, 55 L. Ed. 527 , and similar cases, and not by Atlantic Works v.

Scott v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY

417 F. Supp. 2d 929 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 28, 2006

Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., 15 Ohio St.3d 321 , 474 N.E.2d 271 , 212 —73 (1984) (“If a contract is clear and unambiguous, then its interpretation is *933 a matter of law and there is no issue of fact to be determined … Co. v.

RUCKER v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 3, 2025

Wright v. United States Board of Parole, 557 F.2d 74, 77 (6th Cir. 1977)(citing Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973)). … Capaldi v. Pontesso, 135 F.3d 1122, 1123 (6th Cir. 2003). The remedy afforded under § 2241 is not an additional, alternative, or supplemental remedy to that prescribed under §2255. See Bradshaw v.

Tavenner

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 24, 2025

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … V; see Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 594 U.S. 139, 147 (2021).

Vos v. Cordray

719 F. Supp. 2d 832 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 16, 2010

See, e.g., Levine v. … Bd. of County Com’rs of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (citation omitted).

Moore

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 14, 2026

Brown v. Davenport, 596 U.S. 118, 133 (2022) (quoting Brecht, 507 U.S. at 637). More recently, in Brown v. … See Brown, 596 U.S. at 133.

Kelley Island Lime & Transport Co. v. City of Cleveland

47 F. Supp. 533 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 23, 1942

Randall v. Cockran, 1 Ves.Sen. 90; Godsall v. Boldero, 9 East, 81; Irwing v. Richardson, 1 B. & Adol. 196; Case v. Davidson, 5 Maulé & Selw. 81; Clark v. Blything, 2 Barn. & Cressw. 256.” In the case of Fairgrieve v. … Railroad Co. v.

United States ex rel. Brancato v. Lehmann

136 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 11, 1955

In Johannessen v. … Maney v.

Montgomery v. Bagley

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 1, 2019

(See id., Ex. 2 (Ohio Parole Board Report and Recommendation).) … See Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 664 (1996); McCleskey v.

Motorlines, Ltd. v. United States

215 F. Supp. 345 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 21, 1963

In Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. … In Georgia R.R. & Banking Co. v.

Flint v. Mercy Health Regional Medical Center, LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 25, 2019

See e.g., Financial Resources Network, Inc. v. Brown & Brown, Inc., 754 F. Supp. 2d 128, 155 (D. … Colvin v. Caruso, 605 F.3d 282, 294 (6th Cir. 2010) (citing Crawford v. Roane, 53 F.3d 750, 753 (6th Cir. 1995)).

Gonzales v. Felker

964 F. Supp. 251 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 5, 1997

Joseph A v. New Mexico Dept. of Human Servs., 28 F.3d 1056 , 1059 (10th Cir.1994); Keith v. Volpe, 833 F.2d 850, 855-57 (9th Cir.1987). … Clark v. Board of Educ., 907 F.Supp. 826, 830 (D.N.J.1995); Finkelstein v. Bergna, 804 F.Supp. 1235, 1260 (N.D.Cal.1992). The Court finds that Plaintiffs have met that burden.

Scott

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 16, 2026

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989) (holding the liberal construction of pro se litigants does not “abrogate basic pleading essentials”). … See Marie v. Am.

Mowery v. Mercury Marine, Division of Brunswick Corp.

773 F. Supp. 1012 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 13, 1991

See Mulhern v. … Wood v.

In re Cleveland Freight Lines, Inc.

26 Ohio Misc. 41 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 10, 1970

The case of McKey v. Paradise, 299 U. S. 119 , 81 L. Ed. 75 , 57 S. Ct. 124 , was decided in 1936. … The most recent case decided by the court was Joint Individual Board of the Electrical Industry v. United States, 391 U. S. 224 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 546 , decided in 1968.

Gwirtz v. Ohio Education Ass'n

704 F. Supp. 1481 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 18, 1988

Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. Hudson, 475 U.S. 292, 306 , 106 S.Ct. 1066, 1075-76 , 89 L.Ed.2d 232 (1986). … The Court disagrees and instead agrees with the Second Circuit in Andrews v.