Case law

Robinson v. Runyon

987 F. Supp. 620 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 8, 1997

Defendant submits the affidavit of Jesse Brown, Manager of Human Resources for the Akron Customer Service and Sales District of the Postal Service, stating that no vacancies were available in Toledo or Port Clinton at the … See Ausfeldt v. Runyon, 950 F.Supp. 478 (N.D.N.Y.1997); Miller v. Runyon, 932 F.Supp. 276 (M.D.Ala.1996); Cleveland v. Runyon, 972 F.Supp. 1326 (D.Nev.1997); Suhr v. Runyon, 1995 WL 617478 (N.D.Ill.1995). Cf. Lussier v.

Foster

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 30, 2026

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 109 S. Ct. 1827, 104 L. Ed. 2d 338 (1989); Lawler v. Marshall, 898 F.2d 1196 (6th Cir. 1990); Sistrunk v. City of Strongsville, 99 F.3d 194, 197 (6th Cir. 1996). … Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 447, 462 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404, 117 S. Ct. 1382, 137 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1997)).

Hauman v. City of Youngstown

District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 2, 2022

Kirilenko-Ison v. Board of Educ. of Danville Indep. Schs., 974 F.3d 652, 660 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)). … Midkiff v. Adams Cty. Reg'l Water Dist., 409 F.3d 758, 762–63 (6th Cir. 2005) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569–70 (1972)).

Rodeheaver v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

220 F. Supp. 120 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 30, 1962

In addition to the above authorities many other Ohio cases applying the same principles might be cited, including the recent cases of Brown v. Cleveland Baseball Club, 158 Ohio St. 1 , 106 N.E.2d 632 (1952); Pitts v. … In Hess v.

Mattson v. Pennsylvania Railroad

43 F.R.D. 523 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 12, 1967

Strizak has been followed in the more recent case of Vincenzo v. … [See Greene v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 40 F.R.D. 14 (N.D. Ohio 1966) and Mariner v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 202 F.Supp. 430 (N.D.

Lyons v. Gilligan

382 F. Supp. 198 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 9, 1974

Stuart cities and relies on Tarlton v. … The same result was reached in Brown v. Gillman, No. 73-80-2 (S.D.Iowa, March 30, 1973) (unreported), and Payne v. District of Columbia, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 345 , 253 F.2d 867 (1958). 3 .

Caimona v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Association

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 3, 2019

Brown v. VHS of Michigan, Inc., 545 F. App’x 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Wierengo v. Akal Sec., Inc., 580 F. … Brown v. Whirlpool Corp., 996 F. Supp. 2d 623, 643 (N.D. Ohio 2014) (quoting Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Oancea, No. L–04–1050, 2004 WL 1810347, at *3 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. Aug. 13, 2004).

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States

452 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 13, 1978

See Cortland Specialty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 60 F.2d 937 (2d Cir. 1932). In West Side Federal Savings and Loan Association of Fairview Park v. … Civ.P., see Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corp. v.

Lum v. Mercedes Benz, USA, L.L.C.

246 F.R.D. 544 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 26, 2007

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Buckhannon Board and Care Home v. West Va. … In United States v.

Gomez v. Garland

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 26, 2022

: OPINION & ORDER Plaintiffs, : [Resolving Doc. 1] : v … In October 2018, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirmed USCIS’s decision.22 In addition to stating they agree with the reasons set forth in the USCIS decision, the Board specifically pointed to three factors

Arnold v. Arnold Corp.

668 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 30, 1987

In Shearson-Lehman/American Express, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co., 388 U.S. 395 , 87 S.Ct. 1801 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1270 (1967); Dorton v. Collins & Aikman Corp., 453 F.2d 1161 (6th Cir.1972).

International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 24, 2025

P, Award No. 76, Case No. 76 of Public Law Board 5811). … N, Award No. 32 of Public Law Board 4417).

Shorter v. Trilogy Healthcare of Allen II, LLC

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 8, 2022

Feb. 11, 2016) (holding defendant failed to establish decedent’s daughter had actual authority to enter an arbitration agreement on decedent’s behalf); Brown v. Extendicare, Inc., 39 N.E.3d 896, 912 (Ohio Ct. … Trilogy, relying on Brown v. Extendicare, Inc., 39 N.E.3d 896 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015), argues Annette “clothed [Plaintiff] with the appearance of authority and knowingly permitted her to act as agent on her behalf.”

Williams v. Orzech

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 30, 2019

See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); Beaudett v. City of Hampton, 775 F.2d 1274, 1277 (4th Cir. 1985). … See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). Even liberally construed, the Complaint does not meet the basic pleading requirements.

Sanderson v. City of Toledo

73 F. 220 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 24, 1896

In this case of Waring v. … Judge Longyear, in the case of Gillet v. Pierce, 1 Brown, Adm. 553 , Fed. Cas.

Amato

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 16, 2025

See Bassett v. … Henson v. Lucas County Sheriff’s Office, No. 3:24 CV 2089, 2025 WL 2021393, at *5 (N.D. Ohio July 17, 2025) (quoting Linden v. City of Lansing, No. 1:13-cv-638, 2013 WL 6858459, at *3 (W.D. Mich.

Johnson v. Sheldon

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 18, 2024

Latrell Brown, who was in the backseat when the shootings occurred, testified that Petitioner was also in the car. Brown testified that the victims had cocaine that they planned to sell to Petitioner. … See Lundgren v.

United States v. Edwards

33 F. Supp. 2d 631 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 6, 1999

See United States v. Brown, 413 F.2d 878 (9th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 947 , 90 S.Ct. 965 , 25 L.Ed.2d 127 (1970). … In Barnickel v.

Dartron Corp. v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc.

917 F. Supp. 1173 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 22, 1996

Brown v. Cuenca, 1990 WL 20062 at *2 1990 Ohio App. LEXIS 783 at *5 (Ohio Ct.App. Feb. 28, 1990). Thus, Uniroyal’s promise regarding hazardous and toxic materials did not merge into the deed by law. … .; United Technologies v. Browning-Ferris Inds., Inc., 33 F.3d 96, 98 (1st Cir.1994) (“United Technologies”).

In Re Ruffalo

249 F. Supp. 432 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 4, 1965

In Theard v. … In Reece v.