Case law

Kucinich v. Forbes

432 F. Supp. 1101 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 10, 1977

See also, Papish v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri, 410 U.S. 667, 670-671 , 93 S.Ct. 1197 , 35 L.Ed.2d 618 (1973). *1113 In Buckley v. … Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 671-676 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 415-416 , 84 S.Ct. 461 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964). 11 .

Miller v. Bartunek

349 F. Supp. 251 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 22, 1972

Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , 89 S.Ct. 5 , 21 L. Ed.2d 24 (1968). The Supreme Court has said in the case of Reynolds v. … Defendants rely upon the case of O'Brien et al. v. Brown, et al., 409 U.S. 1 , 92 S.Ct. 2718 , 34 L.Ed.2d 1 (1972) and state that this court should deny jurisdiction of the instant case on its authority.

Asad v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

314 F. Supp. 2d 726 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 2004

He is board certified by the American Board of Pediatrics, the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, with special qualification in child neurology, and the National Board of Medical Examiners. (Docket # 91, Ex. … Hardyman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, 243 F.3d 255, 260 (6th Cir.2001); Clausen v. M/V New Carissa, 339 F.3d 1049, 1057 (9th Cir.2003).

In Re Telxon Corp. Securities Litigation

133 F. Supp. 2d 1010 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 29, 2000

Melder v. … But see Lirette v.

Davis v. Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority

311 F. Supp. 795 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 8, 1970

Since the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Goldberg, Commissioner v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 , and Wheeler v. … State v. Barone, 124 So.2d 490 (Fla.1960) and McDonald v. Commonwealth, 331 S.W.2d 716 (Ky.Ct. of App. 1960).

Thomas

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 19, 2025

See Fry v. Napoleon Cmty. … D.T. v. Sumner Cnty.

Morrisey v. SS a & J FAITH

238 F. Supp. 877 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 4, 1964

In re North Atlantic & Gulf Steamship Co., 204 F.Supp. 899, 907 (S.D.N.Y. 1962); Marine Chartering Co. v. … If there were any doubts about this ancient doctrine, they were effectively put to rest by Judge Brown in The Trenton: “In short, the doctrine that the sale of a vessel by a court of competent jurisdiction discharges her

Taylor v. National Group of Companies, Inc.

729 F. Supp. 575 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 8, 1989

Anderson v. … Co., 454 F.2d 131 (8th Cir.1972) (holding that proceedings before National Railroad Adjustment Board were quasi-judicial and thus pleadings before the board were absolutely privileged).

Watch What Develops Franchise Concepts, Inc. v. Par Five, Inc.

110 F.R.D. 243 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 9, 1985

In determining the attorney fees this Court finds that Northcross v. Board of Ed. Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir.1980), is applicable in this case. … This amount is reasonable and awardable under Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir.1980).

D.A.B.E., Inc. v. City of Toledo

292 F. Supp. 2d 968 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 19, 2003

Co. v. … Inc. v. Toledo-Lucas County Board of Health, Case No. 3:01 CV7334 (N.D.Ohio, 1991), is not governed by the certified questions presented to the Ohio Supreme Court in that case.

In re Albert-Harris, Inc.

213 F. Supp. 602 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 14, 1961

Brown v. Schwehm, 3 Cir., 72 F.2d 1010 . This compromise settles Harris’s judgments against bankrupt, totalling some $263,000, for $137,500 in cash. … Drexel v. Loomis, 35 F.2d 800 (C.C.A. 8, 1929).

Meyers v. Ace Hardware, Inc.

95 F.R.D. 145 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 10, 1982

In Washington v. … See e.g., Arnold v. Ballard, 448 F.Supp. 1025 (N.D.Ohio 1978); Crawford v. Western Electric Co., Inc., 614 F.2d 1300 (5th Cir. 1980); Mescall v.

Dietrich v. Western Ohio Regional Treatment and Habilitation Center

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 16, 2024

Burk’s abuse of power and misuse of resources to the Board, he was then treated differently than the other employees (Dietrich Complaint, at ¶ 12). … Booker v.

Louisville City School District Board of Education v. Local 4 Ohio Association of Public School Employees (OAPSE)/AFSME AFL-CIO

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 21, 2020

Cartwright v. Garner, 751 F.3d 752, 759 (6th Cir. 2014) (citing United States v. Ritchie, 15 F.3d 592, 598 (6th Cir. 1994)). … The School Board claims that it “remains locked in a situation analogous to that hypothesized in MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.[, 549 U.S. 118, 121–22, 127 S. Ct. 764, 166 L.

Peltz v. Northern Ohio Bank

430 F. Supp. 382 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 23, 1976

Relying on SEC v. … Compare, for instance, Voegel v. Brown, [1974-75] CCH Fed.Sec.L.Rep. ¶ 94,831 at 96,785 (S.D.N.Y.1974), with Oleck v. Fischer, 401 F.Supp. 651 (S.D.N.Y.1975), and see Rich v.

Perez v. Roadway Express, Inc.

281 F. Supp. 2d 936 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 12, 2003

On May 3, 2001 Garrett filed an unfair labor practice charge against Teamsters Local 20 with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). On July 12, 2001 Perez filed a similar charge. … See Noble v.

Courtad Construction Systems, Inc. v. Local Union No. 33

311 F. Supp. 2d 623 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 18, 2004

Timeliness It is rationally inferable that the LJAB found the grievance was timely filed when it held the grievance “was properly before the Board.” See D.E.I., Inc. v. … Local 33 contends Courtad failed to object to the alleged partiality of the LJAB board members, thus waived same. An arbitration decision may be vacated if the arbitrators had a “demonstrated bias.” Apperson v.

Midland-Ross Corp. v. United States

214 F. Supp. 631 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 11, 1963

That case is Corn Exchange Bank v. Commissioner, U. S. Board of Tax Appeals, 6 B.T.A. 158 (1927). Taxpayer had sought to amortize bond discount and premium. The Board of Tax Appeals refused to allow such amortization. … It must be remembered that in the Corn Exchange Bank case, supra, the Board of Tax Appeals held that discount was not interest. The next occasion on which the Court was faced with the problem was in Caulkins v.

Zino v. Whirlpool Corp.

141 F. Supp. 3d 762 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 30, 2015

Co. v. … In a notice of supplemental authority (ECF No. 347), Defendants argue that a recent Sixth Circuit opinion, Board of Trustees v.

Aslaksen v. United States

273 F. 241 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 23, 1921

Libelant, master of the Lake Ellenorah, a steamship owned by the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, has filed this libel to recover for salvage services rendered November 5 to 11, 1919, inclusive, to … Nor is it disputed that the libelant is entitled to recover-for salvage services, notwithstanding both ships involved in the operation are owned by a common owner. 35 Cyc. 740; Jacobson v. Panama R. R. Co. (2 C. C.