Case law

Baron v. Dayton Civ. Serv. Bd.

2013 Ohio 4723 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2013

Baron v. Civil Service Board of the City of Dayton, 2d Dist. … Baron v. Civil Service Board of the City of Dayton, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 25273, 2012-Ohio-6179, ¶ 18.

Trafalgar Corp. v. Bd. of Miami Cty. Comm., Unpublished Decision (9-7-2001)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2001

Hudson v. Albrecht (1984), 9 Ohio St.3d 69 . … Id ., quoting Myers v. Fortunato (1920), 12 Del. Ch. 374 , 375 . Here, an amendment of a zoning regulation enacted by a board of commissioners becomes effective in thirty days pursuant to R.C 303.12 (H).

State ex rel. Kirkpatrick v. Madison Twp.

2025 Ohio 5591 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 2025

Kirkpatrick filed the referendum petition with the Pickaway County Board of Elections. … Corp. v. Columbia Gas.

State v. Oldham

53 Ohio Law. Abs. 279 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1948

In State v. … See, also, Brown v. State, 26 Oh St 176. It is also urged by the appellant that the court failed to properly charge the jury as to the purpose for which this evidence as to prior similar offenses was admissible.

Biddle v. City of Dayton

48 Ohio App. 3d 116 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 1988

This principle was cogently stated in Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. … Dayton Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 44, v. State Emp.

State v. Stutz

165 N.E.3d 821 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 2020

The vehicle turned around in the cul-de-sac and sped away after apparently seeing Brown’s marked police cruiser. … See State v.

Grissinger v. Village, Lagrange Zoning Bd., Unpublished Decision (3-14-2001)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 2001

Smith v. Granville Twp. Bd. of Trustees (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 608 , 613 , quoting Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30 , 34 . In making this determination, we apply an abuse of discretion standard. Nauth v. … Andres v. Perrysburg (1988), 47 Ohio App.3d 51 , 55 , citing Colgate v. Harvey (1935), 296 U.S. 404 , 422-23 . The equal protection guarantee only prevents invidious discrimination. Norvell v.

State v. Windham Exempted Village Boe, Unpublished Decision (12-17-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1999

Walker v. Lancaster City School Dist. … Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Village Bd. of Edn. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 21 , 28 .

Gonda v. Austintown Twp. Bd. of Zoning App., Unpublished Decision (2-8-2006)

2006 Ohio 670 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2006

Sottile v. … In Cahill v.

Holt v. City of Cincinnati

4 Ohio App. 2d 119 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 25, 1964

See, also, in this respect, Eversole v. City of Columbus, 169 Ohio St. 205 (an arts and crafts center). See, also, Hyde v. City of Lakewood, 175 N. … The case of Wolf v.

State v. Swinson

2017 Ohio 150 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2017

State v. Murray, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2015-12-029, 2016-Ohio- 4994, ¶ 15. … See State v. Pringle, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2015-08-023, 2016-Ohio-1149, ¶ 7; State v. Worthington, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2014-12-022, 2015-Ohio-3173, ¶ 16.

Dixon v. Yellow Cab Co. of Cleveland Inc.

44 Ohio Law. Abs. 107 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1944

This portion of the charge was prejudicially erroneous and for that reason alone the judgment of the lower court must be reversed, on authority of Swoboda v Brown, 129 Oh St 512, 523; Larsen v Cleveland Railway Co. 142 Oh … St 20; Chowning, Admrx. v Ajax Motor Service Inc. 60 Oh App. 470.

Wolfe v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Bd., Unpublished Decision (1-12-2004)

2004 Ohio 122 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2004

The decision of the board is supported by reliable, probative and substantial evidence and is in accordance with the law. {¶ 13} "V. … D, p. 12). {¶ 32} We agree with Appellant that a conviction cannot be collaterally attacked in these proceedings before the board. Hergenrodes v.

Engleman v. Cincinnati Bd. of Education, Unpublished Decision (6-22-2001)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2001

Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. … In Ellithorp v. Barberton School Bd. of Edn ., a teacher sued her school board for intentional torts after she was injured by a window that had struck her while she was attempting to open it.

1415 Kenilworth, L.L.C. v. Cleveland

2023 Ohio 300 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2023

A board’s decision to deny a variance is accorded a presumption of validity and the burden of demonstrating the decision’s invalidity rests with the contesting party. Consol. Mgt., Inc. v. … Barry v. Bay Village, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 104999, 2017-Ohio- 7244, ¶ 20, citing Phillips v. Westlake Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 92051, 2009-Ohio-2489, ¶ 54, citing Stickelman v.

Ohio Valley Air Ways, Inc. v. Bowers

114 Ohio App. 427 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1961

Freight, Inc., v. Bd. of Township Trustees, 107 Ohio App., 288 . … In the first paragraph of the syllabus of Merchants Cold Storage Co. v.

Bennett v. Montgomery Cty. Clerk of Court

2015 Ohio 4108 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 2015

[Cite as Bennett v. Montgomery Cty. Clerk of Court, 2015-Ohio-4108.] … Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co., 40 Ohio St.3d 190, 192, 532 N.E.2d 753 (1988). We conduct a de novo review of a dismissal under Civ.R. 12(B)(6). Grover v.

State v. Roberson

2021 Ohio 3705 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 2021

State v. Barnes, 12th Dist. Brown No. CA2010-06-009, 2011-Ohio-5226, ¶ 81, quoting State v. 2. Appellant also cited State v. Riggins, 9th Dist. Summit No. 28080, 2017-Ohio-80; and State v. Sweeting, 1st Dist. … State v. Suber Brown, 12th Dist. Butler No. CA2020-09-099, 2021-Ohio-2291, ¶ 17.

Cahn v. Guion, Bldg. Commr.

27 Ohio App. 141 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 30, 1927

The case of State ex v. … The defendant relies on the case of State ex Ohio Hair Products Co. v. Rendigs, 98 OS. 251 .

Cdm Assoc. v. Coronado Woods Assn., Inc.

8 Ohio App. 3d 48 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1982

Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. Ontario Store (1967), 9 Ohio St. 2d 67, 70 [ 38 O.O.2d 163 ], Furthermore, this court must give effect to statutory language which is clear and unambiguous. Bernardini v. … Bd. of Edn. (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 1, 4 [ 12 O.O.3d 1 ]; Crowl v. DeLuca (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 53, at 58-59 [ 58 O.O.2d 107 ].