Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

2.81s

  • Leach v. Board of Review

    115 Ohio App. 235 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1961

    This appeal comes to this court on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, entered on February 27, 1961, reversing, on appeal, the decision of the Board of Review, Bureau of Unemployment … The entry of the Court of Common Pleas, to which court an appeal of the referee’s decision was taken by the administrator, in reversing the decision of the referee, is that “* * The court finds that the decision of the Board

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kunkel v. Board of Commissioners

    177 Ohio App. 3d 718 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2008

    Bd. of Trustees v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Cty. … for in the statute.’ ” Smith v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Simon v. Board of Elections

    87 Ohio Law. Abs. 594 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1961

    State, ex rel. v. Board, 164 Ohio St., 193 , 129 N. E. (2d), 623. … See State, ex rel. v. Brown, 162 Ohio St., 147 , 122 N. E. 2d, 105 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • May v. Board of Education

    12 Ohio App. 456 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1920

    See Wittenmeyer v. Board of Education of Brooklyn, Ohio, 10 C. C., 119. Phillips Case. The 3eed ior the premises in this «ase was by George and Nelson Hitler to the Board of Education of Pickaway township. … The case of Sperry v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • DeRemer v. Board of Education

    72 Ohio App. 283 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1943

    Appellant, Charles DeRemer, brought an action in the Municipal Court of Akron to recover for wages during an interim in which he was laid off, which he claimed to be due to him under a *284 contract with the appellee, the Board … As bearing on this general subject, see Curtis, Safety Dir., v. State, ex rel. Morgan, 108 Ohio St., 292 , 140 N. E., 522 , and State, ex rel. Buckman, v. Munson, Dir., 141 Ohio St., 319 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Minarik v. Board of Review

    118 Ohio App. 71 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1963

    the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court and an order nunc pro tunc was granted transferring the entire file to the Common Pleas Court of Franklin County on the claimed authority of Section 2505.04, Revised Code, and Perry v. … Further, the case of Perry v. Baskey (San *74 dusky C. of A. 1951), 90 Ohio Appeals, 338, is clearly distinguishable.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Richmond v. Board of Review

    64 Ohio App. 2d 243 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1979

    proceedings before the board pertaining to the determination or order complained of, and the appeal shall be heard upon such record certified to the board. … Appellees herein refer to Stephan v. State Veterinary Medical Bd. (1960), 113 Ohio *245 App. 538, as supporting their position. In that case, it was determined that the provision in R.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

    114 Ohio App. 3d 85 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1996

    Brown v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1, 4 , 635 N.E.2d 1230, 1232-1233 . … Brown v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1, 5 , 635 N.E.2d 1230, 1233 (Wright, J., dissenting).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hudson v. Board of Education

    41 Ohio App. 402 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 22, 1931

    Perkins v. Bright, 109 Oh St 14, Locher v. Haserot, 23 C. C. (n.s.) 553. … It may be observed that State ex rel v. Board of Commissioners, 105 Neb. 570 , 181 N. W. 530 , cited by the plaintiff for another purpose!

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Grossglaus v. Board of Elections

    85 Ohio App. 134 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1949

    The leading case on the matter of moot question is, of course, Miner v. Witt, Clerk, 82 Ohio St., 237 , 92 N. … Shriver, County Engineer, v. Hayes, 148 Ohio St., 681 , 76 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brindle v. State Medical Board

    168 Ohio App. 3d 485 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 2006

    Our Place, Inc. v. … Steinfels v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cox v. State Medical Board

    83 Ohio App. 316 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 25, 1948

    This question has been passed upon by our Supreme Court in the case of Williams v. Scudder, 102 Oh St 305. Syllabus 7 provides: “The act of the general assembly, passed April 27, 1915 (106 O. … We cannot substitute our judgment on these questions and answers for that of the Medical Board. The principle is well stated in the case of People, ex rel. Jones v. New York Homeopathic Medical College, 20 N. Y.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Masters v. Board of Education

    2 Ohio Law. Abs. 472 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1924

    The Construction Company claimed that delay in the work was due to the fault of the Board of Education. … The Board of Education in its second defense set up a certain provision of the contract which provided: “Claims by the party J of the first part for damages, by reason of / any delay on the part of the Board or its agents

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Montgomery Township Board of Education v. Ashland County Board of Education

    8 Ohio App. 120 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1917

    of the qualified electors of *122 the territory affected by such order of the county board, file a written remonstrance with the county board against the arrangement of school districts so proposed. … Members of the boards of education of the newly created district shall thereafter be elected at the same time and in the same manner as the boards of education of the village and rural districts.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Knowlton & Breinig v. Board of Education

    13 Ohio App. 30 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1919

    In City of Akron v. … In Carthage v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Berlin Township Board of Trustees v. Delaware County Board of Commissioners

    194 Ohio App. 3d 109 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 2011

    Brown, for appellant. William J. Owen, Aric I. Hochstettler, and Robert J. Rice for appellee. Robert A. Meyer Jr. and James B. Hadden, for intervenor. [Cite as Berlin Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. … Skilton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Strohm v. Board of Liquor Control

    57 Ohio Law. Abs. 378 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1950

    It is significant that the Board itself failed to state any reason for' the rejection of the application. The Board sustained and affirmed the action of the Department in rejecting the application. … Apparently, the Board has not promulgated any rule or regulation governing this matter.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Co. v. Brown

    42 Ohio App. 109 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1932

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Beckley

    40 Ohio App. 66 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1930

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Guckenberger

    62 Ohio Law. Abs. 337 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 8, 1951

    said Board of Education is a local board of education under the law.” … Wachendorf v. Shaver, 149 Oh St, 231.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.