Case law

First Troy National Bank & Trust Co. v. Holder

109 Ohio App. 445 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1959

This fundamental rule of construction is well stated in the case of Findley et al., Trus tees, v. City of Conneaut, 145 Ohio St., 480 , 62 N. E. (2d), 318, where the third paragraph of the syllabus is as follows: “3. … See, also, Townsend’s Exrs. v. Townsend, 25 Ohio St., 477 . The language intentionally used in a will is presumed to have been placed there for a purpose and cannot arbitrarily be ignored.

Davidson v. Keller

9 Ohio App. 2d 340 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1967

Parker v. Young, Admr. (1961), 172 Ohio St. 464 ; Starr v. Young, Admr. (1961), 172 Ohio St. 317 ; American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. Glander, Tax Commr. (1946), 147 Ohio St. 147 (Board of Tax Appeals); Lutz v. … Evatt, Tax Commr. (1945), 144 Ohio St. 341 (Board of Tax Appeals); Oliver v. Evatt, Tax Commr. (1944), 144 Ohio St. 231 (Board of Tax Appeals); Mosholder Motor Freight, Inc., v.

Griger v. Scholz

56 Ohio Law. Abs. 340 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1950

See: Turner v. Central Outdoor Advertising Co. Inc. 15 Oh Ap 105. … Wetmore v. Mellinger, 64 Iowa 741 , 18 N. W. 870 , 52 Am. Rep. 465 ; Smith v. Michigan Buggy Co. 175 Ill. 619 ; 51 N. E. 569 .

Mulder v. Village of Amherst

115 Ohio App. 117 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1962

to submit their findings and opinions in writing to the board, for the board’s determination, which opinions and findings shall be submitted by said medical experts upon these specific questions: “1. … Nunnold, a Taxpayer, v. City of Toledo, 52 Ohio App., 172 .

In Re Claim of Andersen

55 Ohio App. 3d 132 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1988

The predicate for the board’s conclusion in this regard was the decision rendered in U.A.W. v. Giles (N.D. Ohio 1982), 5 OBR 300. … W. v.

Siler v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation

66 Ohio Law. Abs. 523 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1951

Thereupon an application for rehearing was made to the Board of Review and the same was granted. … Counsel for the defendant-appellant herein cites the case of Shannon v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, et al., 155 Oh St 53, to support his position, the syllabus of which reads as follows: “1.

State v. Smith

2019 Ohio 155 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2019

[Cite as State v. Smith, 2019-Ohio-155.] … 2015, the Ohio Parole Board held a hearing to determine whether it would release Smith.

State v. Truss

2019 Ohio 3579 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 2019

State v. … State v.

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Village of Mayfield

53 Ohio App. 2d 37 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1977

In Cleveland Electric Illuminating v. … C. 4905.65 as interpreted in CEI v.

Whitacre v. Bd. of Education

42 Ohio App. 2d 19 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1974

The agreement was signed by the Whitacres, the Milton-Union Board of Education and Ohio Farmers Insurance Company; *22 hence, the settlement agreement was valid and enforceable. See. Bacik v. Weaver, supra; Hageman v. … In the case of Vest v.

Mennel Milling Co. v. Limbach

72 Ohio App. 3d 330 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1991

We think the following language from the case of Ford Motor Co. v. … The items described were conveyor belting, bolts and v-belts for the conveyor system.

State v. Bankston

2024 Ohio 3017 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2024

The Ohio Supreme Court, in State v. … In State v.

Eaton Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. KNG, Ltd.

214 N.E.3d 742 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 2023

Bd. of Trustees v. KNG, Ltd., 2023-Ohio-1621.] … Bd. of Trustees v. Wadsworth, 9th Dist.

Third National Bank & Trust Co. v. Eaton

33 Ohio App. 2d 264 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1972

one half of said residue of said net income shall be paid to the Board of Trustees of The Miami Valley Hospital of Dayton, Ohio, to be used by said Board for the support and maintenance of the Department of said Hospital … In this context, and with a view to intent,’ the language of Item V of the will, as we understand it, makes no allowance for construction.

In re A.E.

2016 Ohio 438 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2016

Morris Co. v. Foley Constr. … Strickland v.

Ohio Neighborhood Preservation Assn. v. Alaura

2023 Ohio 1281 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 2023

E.g., Byrd v. Meyer, 10th Dist. No. 21AP-578, 2022-Ohio-1827, ¶ 13, citing Bullard v. McDonald’s, 10th Dist. No. 20AP-374, 2021-Ohio-1505, ¶ 11. … Boyland v. Giant Eagle, 10th Dist. No. 17AP-133, 2017-Ohio-7335, ¶ 15, citing MacDonald v. Bernard, 1 Ohio St.3d 85, 89 (1982), fn. 1.

State ex rel. Cleveland Concession Co. v. Cleveland (City)

61 Ohio Law. Abs. 316 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1951

us, the action of the Board of Control is immaterial. … State ex rel. v. Industrial Commission, 144 Oh St 619. Cf. State ex rel. v. Cook, 146 Oh St 348. The judgment is reversed and final judgment entered for respondents. CARPENTER, J, CONN, J, concur.

Grant v. Washington Twp.

1 Ohio App. 2d 84 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1963

The judgment of the court as to its Case No. 119,164 purports to find the board of *87 trustees acted unreasonably in rejecting tbe application for rezoning, decreed that tbe board’s order be reversed, and that tbe property … Grant, Jr., Exr., v. Kiefaber (1960), 114 Ohio App., 279 , affirmed in 171 Ohio St., 326 . In view of tbe disposition of that action, we do not consider it controlling.

State ex rel. Ames v. Brimfield Twp. Bd. of Trustees

2019 Ohio 5311 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2019

Temple v. … v. Ohio Assn. of Pub.

Darst v. Bay Village Board of Education, Unpublished Decision (11-10-1999)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1999

Both parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment — plaintiff filed her motion asking for a determination that the board was liable as a matter of law; the board filed its motion claiming immunity under R.C. … See Perry v. Goodin (Sept. 16, 1999), Mahoning App. No. 99 C.A. 187, unreported; Thomas Vending, Inc. v. Slagle (Sept. 24, 1999), Marion App. No. 9-99-16, unreported.