Case law

Black-Dotson v. Obetz, Unpublished Decision (10-10-2006)

2006 Ohio 5301 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 2006

See, Jura v. City of Hudson, Summit App. … Board of Zoning Appeals of Palmyra Township (June 22, 2001), Ashtabula App.

Waite v. Mendenhall

17 Ohio App. 53 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1922

Since the decision of that case the Supreme Court has decided the case of Brown, Admr., v. Winterbottom, 98 Ohio St., 127 , holding the trust *55 estate liable for the negligence of a receiver. … We appreciate that this case is a novel one and that the authorities in other states are conflicting. *56 Nevertheless, considering the case in view of general principles and the light shed by the recent case of Brown v.

State ex rel. Holbrook v. Indus. Comm.

2024 Ohio 5283 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 2024

Foster v. Foley, 170 Ohio St.3d 86, 2022- Ohio-3168, ¶ 10; State ex rel. Swanson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 156 Ohio St.3d 408, 2019-Ohio-1271, ¶ 6. … Roden v.

Haban v. Suburban Home Mortgage Co.

40 Ohio Law. Abs. 78 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1943

Clark v Hubbard, 8 Ohio 382 ; Allegheny Oil Co. v Snyder, 12 O. F. D. 227. However, in Clark v Hubbard, supra, the.court expressly found that the defendant, the cross-petitioner, was in actual possession of the land. … Ellithorpe v Buck, 17 Oh St 72. In Stone v Perkins, (Mo.), 117 S. W. 717 , cited in 117 L. R. A., page 29, it was held that: .

State v. Weaver

2018 Ohio 2998 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 2018

Weaver lived with his father until 2013 when his father became critically ill and the Medina Board of Developmental Disabilities (“the Board”) assisted Mr. Weaver in obtaining his own apartment. … BROWN, Attorneys at Law, for Appellant. S. FORREST THOMPSON, Prosecuting Attorney, and VINCENT V. VIGLUICCI, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee.

Producers Service Corp. v. Limbach

80 Ohio App. 3d 613 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1992

The Board of Tax Appeals erred in finding that Appellant was not a manufacturer within the meaning of R.C. 5711.16 and 5733.061. “3. The Board of Tax Appeals erred in misconstruing and misapplying Stoneco, Inc. v. … In support of his dissent, the chairman of the board relied upon Stoneco, Inc. v. Limbach (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 170 , 560 N.E.2d 578 ; Belden Brick Co. v.

White v. Rhodes

79 Ohio App. 3d 257 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1992

White, in rendering summary judgment in favor of Rhodes and the board. Based on the recent case of Bowen v. … The board also filed a motion for summary judgment. In its motion, the board relied upon Cynthia White’s release, but did not purport to rely upon her affidavit.

Aretz v. Rue

106 Ohio App. 3d 605 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1995

Marianna Brown Bettman, Judge. … Swoboda v. Brown (1935), 129 Ohio St. 512 , 2 O.O. 516 , 196 N.E. 274 , paragraph eight of the syllabus; Baker v. Pendergast (1877), 32 Ohio St. 494 , paragraph one of the syllabus.

Snider Crossing L.L.C. v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Rev.

2025 Ohio 3189 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 2025

See Clark v. … As the BOE correctly observed, "proceedings before a board of revision 'are not governed by the Rules of Evidence.'" Remington Clean Fill LLC v.

Buckeye Lake Firebells v. Leindecker

2011 Ohio 1792 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 2011

The court may not resolve ambiguities in the evidence presented, Inland Refuse Transfer Company v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc. (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 321. … In Stearn v.

Steigerwald v. Branagan, 07 Je 25 (3-18-2008)

2008 Ohio 1528 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2008

See Comer v. Risko , 106 Ohio St.3d 185 , 2005-Ohio-4559 , ¶ 8 . … Inzano v.

Righter Co. v. Board of Cty. Commrs., Unpublished Decision (11-2-2005)

2005 Ohio 6112 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 2005

CO. v. Insurance Co. of America (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 17 , 21 , 540 N.E.2d 266 ; Wise v. … Pawlus v. Bartrug (1996), 109 Ohio App.3d 796 , 800 , 673 N.E.2d 188 ; Lightbody v. Rust, Cuyahoga App.

Blackwell v. International Union, United Auto Workers

9 Ohio App. 3d 179 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1983

Levin v. … See Logsdon v. ABCO Constr. Co. (1956), 103 Ohio App. 233, 241-243 [ 3 O.O.2d 289 ], In this case, Granakis testified that Executive Board ratification of his hiring of Local employees was pro forma and dispensable.

Estate of Kemp v. Chu Brothers, Unpublished Decision (1-13-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2000

Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , citing Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Firestone Co. (1988), 42 Ohio App.3d 6 , appeal dismissed (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 710 . … Brown, 87 Ohio App.3d at 711 . The burden of showing no genuine issue as to any material fact is on the party who requested the summary judgment. Dresher v. Burt (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 280 , citing Harless v.

In re Bruce S.

2011 Ohio 6634 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2011

.; State v. Brown, 8th Dist. No. 90798, 2009-Ohio-127, reversed in part on other grounds, In re Sexual Offender Classification Cases, 126 Ohio St.3d 322, 2010-Ohio-3753, 933 N.E.2d 801; In re Carr, 5th Dist. … See State v.

Antolini v. Newton Falls Township Joint Fire District

157 Ohio App. 3d 8 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2004

Diane V. … Doe v.

State, Ex Rel. Meyers v. Baldwin

94 Ohio App. 381 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1953

See 37 Ohio Jurisprudence, 344, 588, Sections 51, 328, and 8 Ohio Jurisprudence, 242, Section 138; Leis *384 v. Cleveland Ry. Co., 101 Ohio St., 162 , 128 N. E., 73 ; Drake v. Rogers, 13 Ohio St., 21 ; Knapp v. … Rep., 462 ; Miller v. Fairley, 141 Ohio St., 327 , 48 N. E. (2d), 217.

Marinchek v. Brunswick Civil Service Commission

20 Ohio App. 3d 247 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1984

Appellants are school bus drivers for Brunswick City School District Board of Education. For economic reasons, the board purported to abolish all existing bus driver routes and positions. … The employees appealed to the State Personnel Board of Review which found no reduction in pay had occurred. The employees appealed the decision to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County which affirmed the board.

Schechter v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio, Unpublished Decision (8-9-2005)

2005 Ohio 4062 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2005

(Ibid.) {¶ 70} Finally, board member Browning, who represents the interests of consumers on the board, stated that, "if the Board didn't revoke this license, he doesn't know a case where it could." … Brown, P.J., and Petree, J., concur.

L. P. Cavett Co. v. District Lodge 34, Lodge 804, International Ass'n of MacHinists

103 Ohio App. 45 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1956

Grimes & Hauer, Inc., v. Pollock, 163 Ohio St., 372 , 127 N. E. (2d), 203, has no application to the instant facts. … This was made the basis of a complaint to the National Labor Relations Board, and the adjudication of the board was adverse to the defendants.