Case law

White v. Rhodes

79 Ohio App. 3d 257 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1992

White, in rendering summary judgment in favor of Rhodes and the board. Based on the recent case of Bowen v. … The board also filed a motion for summary judgment. In its motion, the board relied upon Cynthia White’s release, but did not purport to rely upon her affidavit.

Aretz v. Rue

106 Ohio App. 3d 605 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1995

Marianna Brown Bettman, Judge. … Swoboda v. Brown (1935), 129 Ohio St. 512 , 2 O.O. 516 , 196 N.E. 274 , paragraph eight of the syllabus; Baker v. Pendergast (1877), 32 Ohio St. 494 , paragraph one of the syllabus.

Snider Crossing L.L.C. v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Rev.

2025 Ohio 3189 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 2025

See Clark v. … As the BOE correctly observed, "proceedings before a board of revision 'are not governed by the Rules of Evidence.'" Remington Clean Fill LLC v.

Buckeye Lake Firebells v. Leindecker

2011 Ohio 1792 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 2011

The court may not resolve ambiguities in the evidence presented, Inland Refuse Transfer Company v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc. (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 321. … In Stearn v.

Blackwell v. International Union, United Auto Workers

9 Ohio App. 3d 179 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1983

Levin v. … See Logsdon v. ABCO Constr. Co. (1956), 103 Ohio App. 233, 241-243 [ 3 O.O.2d 289 ], In this case, Granakis testified that Executive Board ratification of his hiring of Local employees was pro forma and dispensable.

Estate of Kemp v. Chu Brothers, Unpublished Decision (1-13-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2000

Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , citing Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Firestone Co. (1988), 42 Ohio App.3d 6 , appeal dismissed (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 710 . … Brown, 87 Ohio App.3d at 711 . The burden of showing no genuine issue as to any material fact is on the party who requested the summary judgment. Dresher v. Burt (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 280 , citing Harless v.

In re Bruce S.

2011 Ohio 6634 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2011

.; State v. Brown, 8th Dist. No. 90798, 2009-Ohio-127, reversed in part on other grounds, In re Sexual Offender Classification Cases, 126 Ohio St.3d 322, 2010-Ohio-3753, 933 N.E.2d 801; In re Carr, 5th Dist. … See State v.

Antolini v. Newton Falls Township Joint Fire District

157 Ohio App. 3d 8 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2004

Diane V. … Doe v.

Marinchek v. Brunswick Civil Service Commission

20 Ohio App. 3d 247 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1984

Appellants are school bus drivers for Brunswick City School District Board of Education. For economic reasons, the board purported to abolish all existing bus driver routes and positions. … The employees appealed to the State Personnel Board of Review which found no reduction in pay had occurred. The employees appealed the decision to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County which affirmed the board.

L. P. Cavett Co. v. District Lodge 34, Lodge 804, International Ass'n of MacHinists

103 Ohio App. 45 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1956

Grimes & Hauer, Inc., v. Pollock, 163 Ohio St., 372 , 127 N. E. (2d), 203, has no application to the instant facts. … This was made the basis of a complaint to the National Labor Relations Board, and the adjudication of the board was adverse to the defendants.

Mocznianski v. Ohio Department of Job & Family Services

195 Ohio App. 3d 422 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2011

The order directed the county board to develop a new service plan to meet appellant’s needs. This decision was eventually affirmed in an R.C. 119.12 appeal to the court of common pleas. Mocznianski v. … Co. v. PUCO (1937), 301 *431 U.S. 292 , 57 S.Ct. 724 , 81 L.Ed. 1093 , and United States v. Abilene & S. Ry.

Witt v. Ohio State Board of Pharmacy, Unpublished Decision (12-21-2006)

2006 Ohio 6781 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

Univ. of Cincinnati v. Conrad (1980), 63 Ohio St.2d 108 , 110-111 . … State v. Biros (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 426 , 447 , quoting State v.

Bowman v. Leisz

2014 Ohio 4763 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2014

Blakemore v. … Aurora Loan Servs. v. Brown, 12th Dist. Warren No. CA2010- 01-010, 2010-Ohio-5426, ¶ 40 quoting Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc., 76 Ohio St.3d 18, 19 (1996).

McGill v. McGill

3 Ohio App. 3d 455 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1982

As noted in Brown v. … See Culberson v. Culberson (1978), 60 Ohio App. 2d 304 [ 14 O.O.3d 265 ]; see, also, Brown v. Brown (1972), 31 Colo.

State ex rel. Ames v. Regional Income Tax Agency Bd. of Trustees

2025 Ohio 4379 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2025

RITA Board of Trustees Bylaws setting forth rules for notification of meetings in effect for 2023, 2024, and 2025; 2. RITA Board meeting minutes for 2023 2024, and 2025; 3. … RITA Board of Trustee Bylaws (already provided to satisfy request number 1).

Fussnecker v. Lamb

2017 Ohio 8635 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 2017

[Cite as Fussnecker v. Lamb, 2017-Ohio-8635.] … Richter v. Moreland, 12th Dist. Warren No. CA2005-03-031, 2006-Ohio-2946, ¶ 12, citing Fuller v. Drenberg, 3 Ohio St.2d 109, 111 (1965).

State v. Frisbie

2024 Ohio 5523 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2024

State v. Threats, 2016- Ohio-8478, ¶ 19 (7th Dist.), citing State v. Clark, 2008-Ohio-3748, ¶ 37. … Accord State v.

Rdsor v. Knox County Auditor, 08-Ca-23 (5-13-2009)

2009 Ohio 2310 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 13, 2009

*Page 5 {¶ 13} The Auditor and Board of Education appealed the decision to this Court in RDSOR v. Knox County Auditor , 5th Dist. No. 07-CA-12, 2008-Ohio-897 . … Associates v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Vargas v. Columbus Public Schools, Unpublished Decision (5-18-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals · May 18, 2006

Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , 711 , 622 N.E.2d 1153 . … Petree and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Roaden

98 Ohio App. 3d 500 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1994

Texas v. Brown (1983), 460 U.S. 730, 737-739 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1540-1541 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502, 510-512 ; State v. … Brown, supra, 460 U.S. *504 at 738, 103 S.Ct. at 1541 , 75 L.Ed.2d at 511 . Plain view alone is never enough to justify the warrantless seizure of evidence. Coolidge v.